Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "vounteer".
Did you mean:
volunteer
2005 Aug 03
3
debs for 1.0?
...http://src.braincells.com/dovecot-test/).
Even though google turns up
http://hemma.tobbe.nu/debian/mini-dinstall/incoming/dovecot_1.0.test46-1_i386.changes
searching for dovecot on packages.debian.org (any distribution
or source) only yields 0.99.14 and 0.99.20050712.
I know Jaldhar called for vounteers to take over, but I don't
feel qualified... but I've managed to do away with all non-deb
installations, so if I have to I'll make a .deb myself, is there
maybe an already-written script to do that with dovecot?
Thanks for suggestions.
2008 Jul 30
0
[LLVMdev] Is there room for another build system?
...within CMake itself (with some
effort, of course). I lack the knowledge to judge the points you raise
about distribution, package creation, etc. Finally, IMHO your concers
about CMake not preserving as many [autotools] feautures as [it] can,
does not apply to LLVM, at least as there is someone who vounteers to do
the replication work :-)
Please, some LLVM release manager (Tanya?), read Albert's web page and
evaluate how much impact have the issues he raises on your work.
--
Oscar
2008 Jul 30
3
[LLVMdev] Is there room for another build system?
Duncan Sands wrote:
> Do ordinary users need to have cmake if they want to build llvm?
> If so, that's bad because they'll have to install it (unlike the
> current setup, where only very standard tools are needed).
That's not the only problem with cmake. The autotools may be a big and
ugly beast, but that's because they're trying to solve a big and ugly
problem for