search for: vounteer

...http://src.braincells.com/dovecot-test/). Even though google turns up http://hemma.tobbe.nu/debian/mini-dinstall/incoming/dovecot_1.0.test46-1_i386.changes searching for dovecot on packages.debian.org (any distribution or source) only yields 0.99.14 and 0.99.20050712. I know Jaldhar called for vounteers to take over, but I don't feel qualified... but I've managed to do away with all non-deb installations, so if I have to I'll make a .deb myself, is there maybe an already-written script to do that with dovecot? Thanks for suggestions.

...within CMake itself (with some effort, of course). I lack the knowledge to judge the points you raise about distribution, package creation, etc. Finally, IMHO your concers about CMake not preserving as many [autotools] feautures as [it] can, does not apply to LLVM, at least as there is someone who vounteers to do the replication work :-) Please, some LLVM release manager (Tanya?), read Albert's web page and evaluate how much impact have the issues he raises on your work. -- Oscar

...that sparse files are not handled correctly > and fix it You and the others on this thread are IIRC the first people in sftp's 24 year history to ever ask for sparse file support. Its absence is not a bug and adding it will almost certainly require new protocol extensions. Being pushy with vounteer developers, telling us what our priorities should be, assigning us work, etc. will not have the result you want. If you want this to happen, I recommend starting by figuring out what protocol extensions need to be made, and how to support sparse files on system without SEEK_DATA/HOLE - it should b...

Duncan Sands wrote: > Do ordinary users need to have cmake if they want to build llvm? > If so, that's bad because they'll have to install it (unlike the > current setup, where only very standard tools are needed). That's not the only problem with cmake. The autotools may be a big and ugly beast, but that's because they're trying to solve a big and ugly problem for