search for: vorster

Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "vorster".

Did you mean: forster
2007 Jun 21
2
ChanSkype
...md 'ALTER CALL 175 END HANGUP' to fd 18 on Skype dev 'skype1' == Unknown event 'ALTER CALL 175 END HANGUP' from Skype device 'skype1' == Sent cmd 'GET CALL 175 STATUS' to fd 18 on Skype dev 'skype1' Any one got some advice ? Kind Regards, Kyle Vorster _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
2007 Jun 12
1
AsterFax
...o, Have any one had any success installing asterfax. Have installed and it seems like its working, it accepts the fax that was sent via email, dail's out but then just freezes. It then complains about rcfax that needs to be batched or it closes asterisk down. Any advice. Kind Regards, Kyle Vorster
2010 Aug 09
0
Re: btrfsck: checksum verify failed
Is anyone interested in some part of this filesystem to figure out how it failed? Or can I erase and start again? Kind regards, -Evert Vorster- On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Evert Vorster <evorster@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi there. > > I have a btrfs on a raw device. (/dev/sda insted of in a partition, like > /dev/sda1 ) > The device in question is a USB hard drive with a 1TB size. > > The device worked fine for...
2013 Nov 23
2
Booting with Syslinux 6.01 & 6.02 fails, causes restart.
...Any help would be greatly appreciated. On a side note, I have a video clip of the faulty booting, as I was trying to see if there is an error message I am missing, but none was apparent. It's possible for me to post this clip on youtube and post a link here if anybody is interested. -- Evert Vorster Chief Observer WG Cook
2011 Feb 05
2
Strangeness on btrfs balance..
Hi there... I have kernel version 2.6.36.3, compiled with gcc 4.4.5, btrfstools version 0.19+20101101 I have a btrfs filesystem (/data) consisting of two 1TB hard disks, raid0. I added in another 1TB hard drive. root@X86-64:~# btrfs filesystem show failed to read /dev/sdh failed to read /dev/sdg failed to read /dev/sdf failed to read /dev/sde failed to read /dev/sr0 failed to read /dev/fd0u800
2007 Jun 12
0
[asterisk-tech] ChanSkype
...md 'ALTER CALL 175 END HANGUP' to fd 18 on Skype dev 'skype1' == Unknown event 'ALTER CALL 175 END HANGUP' from Skype device 'skype1' == Sent cmd 'GET CALL 175 STATUS' to fd 18 on Skype dev 'skype1' Any one got some advice ? Kind Regards, Kyle Vorster
2013 Nov 23
0
Booting with Syslinux 6.01 & 6.02 fails, causes restart.
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Evert Vorster <evorster at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi there. > > I had a quick look through the archives, and I spotted a similar issue > being reported in October, but no resolution, unfortunately. > "[syslinux] Syslinux 6.02 BIOS" > > I am booting in legacy (bios) mode on a gpt...
2010 Oct 08
5
Slow link/Capacity changed + Kernel OOPS... possible hardware issues, ideas?
well after recently talking about how i haven''t had any problems with btrfs on several machines for ~1.5yrs... it happens :-( ) 2.6.35 kernel ) btrfs on partition 2 of sda ) no special mkfs or mount options used (except ssd) my fiancé''s EEE S101 netbook, w/SSD, is failing hard. when booting normally (subvol=__active), no special boot options, it hangs at udev... it all
2013 Nov 23
0
Booting with Syslinux 6.01 & 6.02 fails, causes restart.
> I'm just a user of the syslinux, but did run into some issues when moving > from 4.x to 5.x and now testing 6.x. The main issue I found was that some > additional .c32 files needed to be copied to make it work. Also, making sure > that all files were from the same version, since mixing different version of the > c32 files resulted in some strange results. Thanks for the
2013 Nov 23
2
Booting with Syslinux 6.01 & 6.02 fails, causes restart.
>> Straight away the booting process looks different than with 4.06. >> The periods that were showing progress in loading the initramfs now >> does not increase as the initramfs is loaded. So, only three periods >> after each initramfs. > > That happened in version 5.00. Good to know that this is expected behavior. However, some sort of indication that the initramfs