search for: vonosma

+llvm-commits (correct list) On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com> wrote: > Could you describe the build failures you see after applying this patch? > I'll let Chris judge if adding -Wl,-syslibroot makes sense for iossim, or > that problem should be solved differently. > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Alex Wang via llvm-de...

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 1:21 PM Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 12:17 PM Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> We have out-of-tree implem...

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 12:17 PM Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com> wrote: > We have out-of-tree implementation of llvm-symbolizer-as-a-library, and I > still hope to upstream it one day (unfortunately, its build process is > really complicated). > > Mike can probably comment on his plans for using symbolization in > coverage-re...

On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 1:53 AM, Evgeniy Stepanov <eugeni.stepanov at gmail.com > wrote: > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 12:41 AM, Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I consider reducing the usage of blacklist in sanitizer instrumentation > > passes and doing the necessary work in frontend (Clang) instead. > > > > Some of it is already implemented: e.g. Clang will attach an attribu...

On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 1:29 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > On Thu Dec 11 2014 at 2:16:00 AM Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Jonathan Roelofs < >> jonathan at codesourcery.com> wrote: >> >>> I think the send-email part of phab has yet to come back up. >>> >> >> Yes, restarting it would be very help...

...t off 3.6 release branch, and Hans assures me that 3.7 release process will use CMake. Are there existing users of configure/make that want sanitizers to be available in their build? Are there other arguments for keeping the autotools build "working" I'm missing? -- Alexey Samsonov vonosmas at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150212/cefe4480/attachment.html>

...l either drop the dependency on Makefile/autoconf build or add the support for sanitizer testing. Anna. > On Feb 17, 2015, at 10:54 AM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: > > +1 (in case you still need mine) > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com <mailto:vonosmas at gmail.com>> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > TL;DR I plan to do subj unless anyone objects. > > Autotools support for building sanitizers was never complete, is a proper subset of CMake capabilities, and the gap between the features of CMake buil...

> On Feb 17, 2015, at 4:00 PM, Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Anna Zaks <ganna at apple.com <mailto:ganna at apple.com>> wrote: > Unfortunately, we do rely on the Autotools to build for darwin. > > The lack of proper testing is very unfortunate. In the future, we...

...nd (4). If a function is blacklisted, TSan pass does nothing. Shouldn't the behavior be the same? I think, we must always do (4) to get good stack traces, and probably do (2) (we may report races on atomics in this case, but otherwise we may miss synchronization). Thoughts? -- Alexey Samsonov vonosmas at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140529/a215bbdc/attachment.html>

...sts.llvm.org> wrote: > I would say it is worth it if someone is actually planning on using > the library in something else. > > Moving the code "just in case" or to create unit tests is not a good > reason IMHO. > > On 20 October 2015 at 16:54, Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We have a lot of non-trivial logic accumulated in the > > implementation of llvm-symbolizer tool > > (tools/llvm-symbolizer/LLVMSymbolize.{h,cpp}), for instance: > > > > * dynamic dispatch between DWARF and PDB debug...

...d_load(const void *addr) void unaligned_store(void *addr, T value); to support headers? We can then provide the default memcpy implementations of these methods and, optionally, straightforward implementations for x86 hosts (and disable UBSan alignment checks for the latter). -- Alexey Samsonov vonosmas at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140819/67b5bf2f/attachment.html>

...To:* Manuel Klimek > *Cc:* clang-dev Developers; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > *Subject:* Re: [cfe-dev] [LLVMdev] Phabricator update > > > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 1:29 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > > On Thu Dec 11 2014 at 2:16:00 AM Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Jonathan Roelofs < > jonathan at codesourcery.com> wrote: > > I think the send-email part of phab has yet to come back up. > > > > Yes, restarting it would be very helpful. > > > > There...

...jonathan at codesourcery.com > CodeSourcery / Mentor Embedded > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > -- Alexey Samsonov vonosmas at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20141210/782ad434/attachment.html>

I'm sure it's obvious and I'm just blind, but I can't find the relevant part of that build that's showing a crash. Can you help me out? On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com> wrote: > +Sergey > > The bot failed on (and looks like it still fails even after LLVM r236877) > on AddressSanitizer-i386-linux :: TestCases/Linux/coverage-missing.cc. > > Now it also has some crashes in X86 DAG->DAG Instruction Selection, > though. +jykni...

...lib/linux/libclang_rt.asan_cxx-i386.a: No >> such file or directory >> clang-3.9: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see >> invocation) >> >> Has anyone seen this? >> >> >> Thanks. Diego. >> > > -- Alexey Samsonov vonosmas at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160226/a4e8a1e0/attachment.html>

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com> wrote: > SGTM. This will bring us closer to the point when we can write tests, > where we strip out the .dwo files from executables, package them together > with llvm-dwp, and then verify that we still get all we need from > llvm-symbolizer. > Not quite following...

...- > From: Renato Golin [mailto:renato.golin at linaro.org] > Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 12:19 PM > To: Alexey Samsonov > Cc: sgundapa; LLVM Dev > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] [compiler-rt] CMake bug in building ARM builtins > library > > On 8 July 2014 19:47, Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com> wrote: > > compiler-rt/lib/builtins/arm/*.S files are listed in arm_SOURCES > > variable, and therefore should make it into the builtins static > > library on ARM. Don't they? > > I assume so... But I'm not an expert in CMake. > > -- Alexey...

Fixed by LLVM r262063, thanks for reporting this! On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com> wrote: > Looking > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: > >> +Alexey >> >> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 5:30 AM, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>&g...

...tions of transitivity (which is probably the most important type of bug). > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Alexey Samsonov via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> (+correct cfe-dev list) >> >> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Yuri, >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Yury Gribov via llvm-dev < >>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> UndefinedBehaviorSanit...

(+correct cfe-dev list) On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Yuri, > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Yury Gribov via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer currently does not check for undefined >> behaviors which result from...