search for: voluntaries

Hi, I am profiling some workloads for the voluntary and involuntary context switches. I am interested in finding out the reasons causing these two types of context switches. As far as I understand, involuntary context switch happens on expiration of time slice or when a higher priority process comes in. While the voluntary switch generally happens when a process is waiting for I/O etc. So to

Hi ! All MP3 radio stations have disappeared from dir.xiph.org... Is this a bug or is this voluntary ?! Thanks, yomguy

lol - yep when news of this first broke I thought thats actually a very good idea to have implemented, though it sounds the way Trixbox implemented it may have been unsecure. Maybe someone else can come up with a better way of implementing this. If the data was all randomised there's no harm in doing this; some basic infomration like; Hours of uptime Reboots Number of extensions Number of

Hello All!!! I was wondering if you can help me little bit.... I am trying to help (voluntary service) a country side school (Aboriginal community) in Northern Queensland Australia setup lab infrastructure, it's a very remote school and they don't have enough funds to go commercial The school has only till grade 6 They have 25 machines that was bought out of the

======= 2005-12-06 22:16:17 伳侜佋佢伬伌佇伵佒佇佇伌伒伬仯伜======= >Martin Maechler a 侀crit : > >> please, please, these trailing ";" are *so* ugly. >> This is GNU S, not C (or matlab) ! >> >> but I'll be happy already if you could >> drop these ugly empty statements at the end of your lines... > >May I disagree ? >I find missing ";" at

On Jul 26, 2012, at 4:07 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > <dropping llvm-commits> > > On Jul 2, 2012, at 9:59 AM, Alexander Kornienko wrote: > >> Hi llvmdev, llvm-commits, >> >> There was a discussion on this topic a while ago, and now I've decided to make a formal proposal and post it here. > > I missed the earlier

Hi Quick question about something I find surprising: In tdb mode : net cache list -s /etc/samba/smb.conf |grep '\-513' Key: IDMAP/GID2SID/100?? ? Timeout: Tue Apr? 9 14:34:48 2024 Value: S-1-5-21-1040823229-2152490729-3717368692-513 id of group "domain users" is?100 But id 100 use by "users" system group: getent group|grep users users:x:100: Is this something

I realise that Samba is a voluntary effort and keeping Web Sites upto date may not be everyone's favourite occupation, but there appear to be a number of things missing or wrong: a) There is no contact info for the WebSite I could discern - hence posting here. b) There is still reference to samba-bugs@samba.org address - which I have been informed by it, is now dead. So may be this could be

Hi all, New offers for cheap Rails hosting keep popping-up at an increasing pace. - Are they any good? - Is this 60$/year plan good enough for me? - "Is DreamHost any good, despite the hundreds of accounts per server?" - Will plan Z support the load/traffic my client expect? - Is this 60$/month plan @ hoster X better than the 14$/month plan @ hoster Y - Why is

Full_Name: Brad Christoffersen Version: 2.3.1 OS: Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (128.196.193.132) Why is the difference between two numbers so different from the "mean relative difference" output from the all.equal() function? Is this an artifact of the way R stores numerics? I could not find this problem as I searched through the submitted bugs. But I am brand new to R so I

On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 09:08:22PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP > +#define fence() metag_fence() > +#else > +#define fence() do { } while (0) > #endif James, it strikes me as odd that fence() is a no-op instead of a barrier() for UP, can you verify/explain?

On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 09:08:22PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP > +#define fence() metag_fence() > +#else > +#define fence() do { } while (0) > #endif James, it strikes me as odd that fence() is a no-op instead of a barrier() for UP, can you verify/explain?

Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> writes: > Hi, > > I was wondering if you guys are using a tool of some sort for generating > the HTML for LLVM or if you are writing it by hand? It is written by hand. > I am thinking of > submitting some Windows-specific documentation because I honestly find it > quite difficult to get things up and running with MINGW64. I may

Hi Peter, On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 02:41:28PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 09:08:22PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP > > +#define fence() metag_fence() > > +#else > > +#define fence() do { } while (0) > > #endif > > James, it strikes me as odd that fence() is a no-op instead of a > barrier() for UP, can

> On 2014-12-07, at 14:57, jay at m5.chicago.il.us wrote: > > >> >> If you want a stand alone Wine, you are looking at React OS, >> which is awful .... >> > > I have noticed that also. Does anyone here know anything about the > ReactOS project? Is it ever going to be a respectable free non-Unix > operating system, like Haiku or Plan 9? Yes. To

Thanks Evan. On 09/11/2007, at 6:50 PM, Evan Cheng wrote: >> 1. What optimization passes, if any, should I run on the module >> before I pass it to the ExecutionEngine. > > The default JIt driver, lli, runs everything. My reading of the lli source indicates that it's not explicitly doing any opt passes - is that happening implicitly in the ExecutionEngine? I can see

Hi, I was wondering if you guys are using a tool of some sort for generating the HTML for LLVM or if you are writing it by hand? I am thinking of submitting some Windows-specific documentation because I honestly find it quite difficult to get things up and running with MINGW64. I may be daft, but so may others :-) As a former build master, I have a strong preference for documentation that

FYI It looks like FWD is looking for value added service ideas for free as a volunteer. I think it will fail but we shall see. I really don't get the nerve of them (Free World Dialup has changed it's name to FWD) to ask for free ideas and development on a non-free service. Maybe if they can come up with a killer app and people will adopt it, then it might work, but then again, people

On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 2:02 AM, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk>wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> On Jul 26, 2012, at 4:07 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >> >> > <dropping llvm-commits> >> > >> > On Jul 2, 2012, at 9:59 AM, Alexander

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jul 26, 2012, at 4:07 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > > <dropping llvm-commits> > > > > On Jul 2, 2012, at 9:59 AM, Alexander Kornienko wrote: > > > >> Hi llvmdev, llvm-commits, > >> > >> There was a discussion on