search for: volue

...t the following error message: *virsh # define /local/myNode/esxdomain.xml* *Domain testNode defined from /local/myNode/esxdomain.xml* *virsh # start testNode* *error: Failed to start domain testNode* *error: internal error: Could not start domain: GenericVmConfigFault - Cannot open the disk /vmfs/volues/5208f99d-760cf4a2-000c29520788/testNode.vmdk or one of the snapshot disks it depends on.* * * * * I checked the datastore of my ESX server and found out that instead of file one directory is getting created with the name* cluster.vmdk *and inside it there are few more files but cluster.vmdk file i...

.../local/myNode/esxdomain.xml > > Domain testNode defined from /local/myNode/esxdomain.xml > > virsh # start testNode > > error: Failed to start domain testNode > > error: internal error: Could not start domain: GenericVmConfigFault - > Cannot > > open the disk /vmfs/volues/5208f99d-760cf4a2-000c29520788/testNode.vmdk > or > > one of the snapshot disks it depends on. > > > > > > I checked the datastore of my ESX server and found out that instead of > file > > one directory is getting created with the name cluster.vmdk and inside it...

...sage: > > virsh # define /local/myNode/esxdomain.xml > Domain testNode defined from /local/myNode/esxdomain.xml > virsh # start testNode > error: Failed to start domain testNode > error: internal error: Could not start domain: GenericVmConfigFault - Cannot > open the disk /vmfs/volues/5208f99d-760cf4a2-000c29520788/testNode.vmdk or > one of the snapshot disks it depends on. > > > I checked the datastore of my ESX server and found out that instead of file > one directory is getting created with the name cluster.vmdk and inside it > there are few more files but...

...tware http://www.centrify.com/directcontrol/overview.asp . But we are looking a freeware solution. (kerberos ? openldap ? pam ? ...) Does someone has already successfully replace NIS by Ad authentification with freeware solution ? Regards. __________________________ Notre adresse de messagerie ?volue pour plus de simplicit? vers : prenom.nom at ifpen.fr. La racine @ifpenergiesnouvelles.fr reste n?anmoins active. Our e-mail address is changing to firstname.surname at ifpen.fr. Nevertheless, messages sent to the domain @ifpenergiesnouvelles.fr will still be delivered. Ce message (et toutes s...

I am running squid + sarg, how can I change the ip-address in the generated report into username? The users are free to surf the web anonymously, no need to provide a login or any authentication to the proxy. Thanks

Hello list I use sendmail-8.14.4-8.el6.x86_64 and I wonder how to restrict the number of emails sendmail sent over an hour. Is the define(`confMAX_QUEUE_RUN_SIZE', `200') command what I'm looking for? Thank you in advance. Nikos

...controller: O2 Micro, Inc. Device 8320 (rev 05) 0b:00.2 Mass storage controller: O2 Micro, Inc. Device 8330 (rev 05) [root at localhost ~]# Did someone know what to do for sound and for this 2 USB 3.0 connectors ? Regards. __________________________ Notre adresse de messagerie ?volue pour plus de simplicit? vers : prenom.nom at ifpen.fr. La racine @ifpenergiesnouvelles.fr reste n?anmoins active. Our e-mail address is changing to firstname.surname at ifpen.fr. Nevertheless, messages sent to the domain @ifpenergiesnouvelles.fr will still be delivered. Ce message (et toutes s...

...the nodes back ? > No. You just need to erase the data on those bricks and add those bricks back to the volume. The previous remove-brick command will make the volume plain distribute. Then simply adding the bricks without specifying any "#" will expand the volume as a plain distribute volue. > > Im planning on moving with this changes in few days. At this point each > brick has 14tb and adding bricks 1 from node A and B, i have a total of > 28tb, After doing all the process, (removing and adding bricks) I should be > able to see a total of 56Tb right ? > Yes after a...

...the nodes back ? > No. You just need to erase the data on those bricks and add those bricks back to the volume. The previous remove-brick command will make the volume plain distribute. Then simply adding the bricks without specifying any "#" will expand the volume as a plain distribute volue. > > Im planning on moving with this changes in few days. At this point each brick has 14tb and adding bricks 1 from node A and B, i have a total of 28tb, After doing all the process, (removing and adding bricks) I should be able to see a total of 56Tb right ? > Yes after all these you wi...

...nodes back ? >> No. You just need to erase the data on those bricks and add those bricks back to the volume. The previous remove-brick command will make the volume plain distribute. Then simply adding the bricks without specifying any "#" will expand the volume as a plain distribute volue. >> >> Im planning on moving with this changes in few days. At this point each brick has 14tb and adding bricks 1 from node A and B, i have a total of 28tb, After doing all the process, (removing and adding bricks) I should be able to see a total of 56Tb right ? >> Yes after all...

...; > No. You just need to erase the data on those bricks and add those bricks > back to the volume. The previous remove-brick command will make the volume > plain distribute. Then simply adding the bricks without specifying any "#" > will expand the volume as a plain distribute volue. >> >> >> Im planning on moving with this changes in few days. At this point each >> brick has 14tb and adding bricks 1 from node A and B, i have a total of >> 28tb, After doing all the process, (removing and adding bricks) I should be >> able to see a total of 5...

...ou just need to erase the data on those bricks and add those bricks >> back to the volume. The previous remove-brick command will make the volume >> plain distribute. Then simply adding the bricks without specifying any "#" >> will expand the volume as a plain distribute volue. >>> >>> >>> Im planning on moving with this changes in few days. At this point each >>> brick has 14tb and adding bricks 1 from node A and B, i have a total of >>> 28tb, After doing all the process, (removing and adding bricks) I should be >>&gt...

...; > No. You just need to erase the data on those bricks and add those bricks > back to the volume. The previous remove-brick command will make the volume > plain distribute. Then simply adding the bricks without specifying any "#" > will expand the volume as a plain distribute volue. > > > > Im planning on moving with this changes in few days. At this point each > brick has 14tb and adding bricks 1 from node A and B, i have a total of > 28tb, After doing all the process, (removing and adding bricks) I should be > able to see a total of 56Tb right ? > &g...

Hi Kotresh, Yes, all nodes have the same version 4.1.1 both master and slave. All glusterd are crashing on the master side. Will send logs tonight. Thanks, Marcus ################ Marcus Peders?n Systemadministrator Interbull Centre ################ Sent from my phone ################ Den 13 juli 2018 11:28 skrev Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar <khiremat at redhat.com>: Hi Marcus, Is the