search for: volatities

...ents itself in the structure TIme Index - Stock Price 1 - 15,6 2 - 17 ... ... 2010 - 28 2011- 28,5 ... 4500 - 23 Since I want to have the volatility only for certain dates, I define these dates in a vector Deal_Dates <- c(500,600,700,805) and use the for-command to calculate these specific volatities via for(i in Deal_Dates){Volatility(i)} My problem is now, that I want to save the results in a new matrix which i created in the structure results <- matrix(rep(NA,4*2),4,2) in a way that Time Index - Volatility 500 - 0.55 600 - 0.44 700 - 0.45 805 - 0.66 is stored in the results matrix....

I received the following warnings building V2.2.8a on Sun Solaris 2.6, using gcc V2.7.2.2. Should I be worried? Thanks, M P Shakespeare BTexact UK Compiling libsmb/clireadwrite.c libsmb/clireadwrite.c: In function `cli_issue_read': libsmb/clireadwrite.c:60: warning: right shift count >= width of type libsmb/clireadwrite.c:60: warning: right shift count >= width of type

> > Message: 6 > Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 20:23:16 +0200 > From: David Demelier <demelier.david at gmail.com> > To: freebsd-stable at freebsd.org > Subject: Re: 9.2-PRE: switch off that stupid "Nakatomi Socrates" > Message-ID: <5249C194.8030504 at gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > On 30.09.2013 15:50, Matthieu Volat

Is there a "cookbook" for setting this up? There are examples for setting up a tunnel between two fixed-address networks (e.g. a remote LAN that needs to be "integrated" with a central LAN over IPSec but I can't find anything addressing the other situation -- remote user(s) where the connecting IPs are not known in advance, such as a person with a laptop or smartphone in a

* When a goto in a _finally occurs, we must "unwind" to the target code, not just "jump" to target label I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. In the Microsoft ABI, goto out of a catch block also calls into the unwinder. We have to run any destructors, and return from the funclet (catchret/cleanupret). * The call inside a _try is an invoke with EH

Reply inline From: Ten Tzen <tentzen at microsoft.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2020 3:54 PM To: Eli Friedman <efriedma at quicinc.com>; llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Cc: aaron.smith at microsoft.com Subject: [EXT] RE: [llvm-dev] [RFC] [Windows SEH] Local_Unwind (Jumping out of a _finally) and -EHa (Hardware Exception Handling) ? For goto in finally, why are you

Hello, I'd like to switch off this silly "Nakatomi Socrates" message which reminds me on Linux and their childish naming schemes. It is only cosmetics, but it bothers me whenever I switch on the laptop. I guess there is a switch already prsent to have in the bootloader config? Thanks, oh -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: