search for: voiptow

...asterisk + door opener Never got the financial backing for it. I looked in to mass producing it in China and I was in way over my head. I am currently working with an investor. I will let you guys know if anything comes up. Dovid ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jerry" <jerry@voiptower.com> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 11:30 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] asterisk + door opener Hi Dovid, > I am actually now working on massproducing door > openers...

Hi, I've dug a bit through the wiki and the mailing lists, and haven't really seen anything like this, but there must be someone out there doing this. Basically, there is a fax line that I don't want to answer inbound, but I want it available to do dial out from. Right now, we are using a busy wait around the ringing line, but I was hoping for something that might be a little more

Hi all, I'm looking at some suggestions from you techies out there. Let me explain my scenario. Im a reseller to callshops. I need to take around 100 concurrent calls. Almost all endpoints are sending G723 codec and my peers take G729. Can anyone recommend the Server Specs that is ideal for this scenario. Im planning to lease a server. Calls are purely SIP or IAX2 only. Thanks in advance.

Hi! I am new to asterisk and I'd like to know wheter the following scenario is possible: Someone press the Button on the door station. The door station dials lets say the extension 333. I take the call on 333 and talk with the person on the door. Now I'd like to activate the door opener by pressing some numbers on the analog telefon. Asterisk should now recognize that I pressed

Hi everyone, I have a number of SIP registrations going fine, but am trying to get a new provider going, and they have no sample Asterisk SIP config. They have been helpful, but keep falling back to the way they "think" packets should be flowing, and I've been trying to figure out how the Asterisk config should look like to get the SIP packet to look correct. Now, they say that

I'm trying to clarify contexts and their uses. I do have a good general understanding of them. My question is about "undeclared" and "non-existant" contexts. If I have a block somewhere (in sip.conf, for example), and it has no "context=thiscontext" field, does it just automatically use the "default" context? Or is this settable? (I see there is an

Hi Andrew, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: > > On Monday 27 June 2005 00:34, Jerry wrote: >> Question: There are problems using FXS ports to pass data and get high >> speed access, but can an FXO port be used as a modem? Nothing fancy >> required, 12 or 2400 baud should be ok (9600+ would be nice, but >> practical >> over nice). I know there is something like this with

I'm having a bit of an issue with one of the bargain x100p clones, and I'm not sure what the right approach is. My symptom started as way loud offset delayed echo from voip hardphones -> PSTN through the clone card. I played with and then learned everything I could about echo cancelling, and have managed to bring the echo down to acceptible levels, where it's not too intrusive. In

Rich Adamson <radamson@routers.com> wrote: > >> I have been investigating on this list and found that faxing is not >> reliable between Zaptel >> cards and that Digium does not support nor >> recommend fax over the TDMXXB interfaces. >> >> Is this true ? Will fax not be reliable enough for my customer ? > > True... the TDM card (or its drivers)

Hi all, Some simple questions about codecs: What codec does the Zap channel use by default? Can this default be changed, and to what? (g729 too?) What codec does meetme use? (I think this is ulaw, but asking to be sure) Can you use another codec, or does everything have to be transcoded to ulaw? Finally ... if I have a 3way call going, between 1 g729 caller and two other callers, do I need one

Hi, On Sun Jun 12 09:11:13 CDT 2005, Rich Adamson wrote: > > > exten => s,1,Wait(1) > > exten => s,2,GoTo(s,1) > > > > If I'm on the console when a call comes in, it loops through this bit of > > code a bunch of times. I'm guessing I could lengthen the "Wait(1)" time, > > but is there any other way to do this? > > Sure there is,