Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "void_ty".
Did you mean:
void_type
2008 Feb 26
1
[LLVMdev] Compatible Return Type for Intrinsics
...types which
collectively encompass all the possibilities posed by
the instruction type
I would for example try to map all dependencies via
overloading to
three
intrinsic types: anyint,anyfloat and ptr_ty. Would
that be sufficient
or is
there any simpler approach to this? As far as i
understand void_ty
means "no
return value" and not the C semantics of void. The
strong type system
makes
me fear that this approach won't work either?
Thank You
Aditya
____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for last minute shopping deal...