search for: vmwgfx_resv

With this gem and ttm will use the same reservation object, so mixing and matching ttm / gem reservation helpers should work fine. Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_object.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_object.c index

With this gem and ttm will use the same reservation object, so mixing and matching ttm / gem reservation helpers should work fine. Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_object.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_object.c index

...mann <kraxel at redhat.com> While doing my prime doc+cleanup series I wondered whether we should do this for everyone, and perhaps even remove ttm_bo.ttm_resv. Only driver which doesn't yet have a gem_bo embedded in the same allocation is vmwgfx, and that would be easy to fix by adding a vmwgfx_resv somehwere. Anyway, looks like a solid start into the convergence story. Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_object.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/...