Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "vmt".
Did you mean:
vmi
2004 Jul 10
3
[LLVMdev] Re: [llvm-commits] CAUTION: Type != Value
In VMCore/Module.cpp i found line (254):
((Value*)Ty)->setName(Name, &ST);
Type is not Value now and for me this code call
llvm::DerivedType::addAbstractTypeUser (I think it have same index in Type
VMT in as setName in Value VMT)
with random argument values and terminated with assert fail:
Assertion failed: (isAbstract() && "addAbstractTypeUser: Current type not
abstract!"), function addAbstractTypeUser, file
/home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/src/llvm/include/llvm/DerivedTypes.h, l...
2004 Jul 10
0
[LLVMdev] Re: [llvm-commits] CAUTION: Type != Value
...On Sat, 2004-07-10 at 07:01, Vladimir Merzliakov wrote:
> In VMCore/Module.cpp i found line (254):
>
> ((Value*)Ty)->setName(Name, &ST);
>
> Type is not Value now and for me this code call
> llvm::DerivedType::addAbstractTypeUser (I think it have same index in Type
> VMT in as setName in Value VMT)
> with random argument values and terminated with assert fail:
>
> Assertion failed: (isAbstract() && "addAbstractTypeUser: Current type not
> abstract!"), function addAbstractTypeUser, file
> /home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/src/llvm/inclu...
2014 Mar 03
3
[LLVMdev] [RFC] C++11: 'virtual' and 'override'
While doing the conversion of LLVM_OVERRIDE to 'override' last night, I
noticed that the code base is rather inconsistent on whether the 'virtual'
keyword is also used when 'override' is used.
Should we have a coding standard for this? What's the preferred direction
here? Seems not having 'virtual' is less overall text, but not sure how
others feel.
Related,
2014 Apr 09
3
[Bug 77230] New: NV40 PGRAPH "unknown bits" - windows render in white
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77230
Priority: medium
Bug ID: 77230
Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org
Summary: NV40 PGRAPH "unknown bits" - windows render in white
QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org
Severity: normal
Classification: Unclassified
OS: Linux (All)
Reporter:
2008 Jun 30
4
Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
Hello list.
I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without
modifications.
How did I try it?
Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock )
Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a
rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee
prep-out.log
The build failed at the end:
Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL
Checking
2009 Jul 23
1
[PATCH server] changes required for fedora rawhide inclusion.
...~AUcE0?1w)^m4x<-|9*+p9XREbM(BPj{`i-mO7}>v
zpscp}DuX%EZ>-sb`L8nK;YSfd>K{pzaANfQ6b>d^;Ez1D|E<csWoYi1c{h(N!7tH7
z-!X$EnZh?ng(Qyq8O!)`Mne)xD17xEv7S7!Q9urkp at YuDb@E4wx0LouKMI at 4;wt;B
z&NNfB*4!);WY%&zT~fbAEsH?A{m(5KpH#zzvZ~jS7q(vDwl;XaHHVg at V&i`?1vZSu
zXrgY<BNSEjs48RVMtjhPX~$Fj;TWjEaajKy(Ez*TO6142Ih3d7#Y}Fd;S(P#N<lFL
z+)<?K{;-}*;|Ok<SR7^p82Et58KyYFr6df<bAfv8?eNs4<9*as80KEkmP$b75wLaw
zuooZq-U;buZg;D@{PuflZ5O?43hb#Eh{KDebYe0y+PiL3s`YP4fjidhvlj&rr~s;a
zys7wWju&1~iV8_C9mL-_p$JeZ@&tRp7Potl!e!E8z!}jp@=k^~`Etr1EEzDZUKzW0
z*Rxi4BIo08ZO3K3b#F2#o}...