search for: vmnet8

On 2014?03?07? 23:05, Ady wrote: > I understand that these remarks might seem not the main issue, but I > tend to think that once you are successful while using only "default" > > values and in a minimalistic case, you could add complexity > (different paths, multiple firmwares, additional kernels, multiple > cfg files...). Ady, Thanks. I will follow your advice to

...ll follow your advice to test more. > > Gene, > You mentioned you have booted several EFI64 systems with x86-64 kernels > successfully. > Could you please share your config files of dhcp, tftpd, pxelinux, and > the tree of your tftpboot dir? > Thanks in advance. In /etc/vmware/vmnet8/dhcpd/dhcpd.conf I added the following: host 7x { hardware ethernet 00:0C:29:38:6B:6E; filename "e6/bootx64.efi"; next-server 172.21.1.1; # option vendor-encapsulated-options d2:1B:68:74:74:70:3A:2F:2F:31:37:32:2E:32:31:2E:31:2E:31:2F:74:66:74:70:2F:65:36:2F...

In /etc/shorewall/masq I have: eth0 eth1 eth0 vmnet1 eth0 vmnet8 ------------- eth0 is my default route to the Linksys router connected to the cable modem. eth1 is my connection to 192.168.1 subnet and it is the gateway for all other machines on this subnet. My routing table is: # netstat -nr Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask...

...tory from one large disk partition to another disk, both ext2, on the same physical system by using the command: rsync --archive -v /etc /mnt/hdf/ I systematically get the following errors: # rsync --archive -v /etc /mnt/hdf/ building file list ... done etc/ etc/mtab etc/ntp/drift etc/vmware/vmnet8/dhcpd/dhcpd.leases etc/vmware/vmnet8/dhcpd/dhcpd.leases~ write failed on etc/mtab : No space left on device rsync error: error in file IO (code 11) at receiver.c(243) rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (44803 bytes read so far) rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (44803 bytes read so far) rsyn...

On 2014?03?08? 05:56, Gene Cumm wrote: > In /etc/vmware/vmnet8/dhcpd/dhcpd.conf I added the following: > > host 7x { > hardware ethernet 00:0C:29:38:6B:6E; > filename "e6/bootx64.efi"; > next-server 172.21.1.1; > # option vendor-encapsulated-options > d2:1B:68:74:74:70:3A:2F:2F:31:37:32:2E:32:31:2E:3...

...as the hardware of the computer was very good to support it. No worried with the vmware even both the servers are running properly. My Samba was set to use Interface eth0 with ip 192.168.50.56 . Upon installation the Vmware installed two new interface called vmnet0 having the ip 192.168.219.1 and vmnet8 having the ip 172.16.237.1. Now when my client computers try to contact the samba server there are requesting either of these 2 interfaces for replies. Which I dont want them to do. I want the client computers to request all the samba stuff requests to 192.168.50.56and not to anyother IP's. How...

...Routing IP abilitato . . . . . . . . : S? Proxy WINS abilitato . . . . . . . . : S? Scheda Ethernet WmWare NAT: Suffisso DNS specifico per connessione: Descrizione . . . . . . . . . . . . . : VMware Virtual Ethernet Adapter (Network Address Translation (NAT) for VMnet8) Indirizzo fisico. . . . . . . . . . . : 00-50-56-C0-00-08 DHCP abilitato. . . . . . . . . . . . : S? Configurazione automatica abilitata : S? Indirizzo IP configurazione automatica: 169.254.218.201 Subnet mask . . . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.0.0...

Hi, I have a centos 7 host server, which hosts vmware vms with various Os. I want to reach a ubuntu 14.04 vm through ssh and x2go (ssh as well). What I did. 1/ open a 2296 port in firewalld. 2/ add 2296=internalvmip:22 in tcp section of /etc/vmware/vmnet8/nat/nat.conf (vmnet8 being the vms network) >From the host server I can ssh the vm, but from outside, a ssh -p 2296 user at hostserverip gives me a connection refused. I tried a firewall-cmd --zone=external --add-forward-port=port=2296:proto=tcp:toport=22:toaddr=internalvmip but it does not...

Hello all, This has been making me crazy for a while, but it seems like a really easy fix. I just can't figure out what it is. Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. I have two Linux machines existing on a mostly MS network and have samba running well on each. However, one machine resolves the wrong ip address of the other machine. Here's the setup. Machine 1: Laptop uses DHCP to

...ername map = /etc/samba/username.map time server = yes log level = 2 syslog = 0 log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 10000 unix extensions = No printcap name = cups os level = 32 interfaces = lo eth0 vmnet1 vmnet8 bind interfaces only = yes wins server = 192.168.x.y preferred master = No local master = No domain master = No dns proxy = No panic action = /usr/share/samba/panic-action %d idmap backend = idmap_rid:DOMAIN=10000-19999...

...rver-side LAN workstations to reach networks server by routed VPN workstations as gateways [this involves OpenVPN more, I believe]. The LAN should still be invisible to the routed VPN. My server routing table is: 172.27.0.2 dev tun0 proto kernel scope link src 172.27.0.1 192.168.20.0/24 dev vmnet8 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.20.1 10.4.1.0/24 via 172.27.0.2 dev tun0 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.71 192.168.0.0/24 dev br1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.72 192.168.30.0/24 dev vmnet1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.30.1 172.27.0.0/16...

I know this is a little off topic (not as usual, dammit!), but I figure at least one of y'all can handle this one. I have tried to configure my CentOS4.4 Plus desktop for samba sharing with the VMWare Windows that runs on it. However, no matter what I've done so far, I can't get the Windows to recognize this machine as a legitimate network destination. Here's my samba

Hi list!!! Anybody, please, can help me. My CentOS 5.4 after that update to new kernel, my vmware server not work the interface bridge, with new kernel and old kernel. Only work with default install of CentOS 5.4, done update, not work. Anybody, please? ps.:Interface, nat, host-only, vmnet1 and vmnet8, work fine. Regards. Bye. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20100205/03705442/attachment.html>

...t, administrator username map = /etc/samba/smbusers passdb backend = tdbsam use sendfile = no large readwrite = no log level = 10 syslog = 0 log file = /var/log/samba/%m max log size = 50 # socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_KEEPALIVE SO_SNDBUF=8192 SO_RCVBUF=8192 interfaces = vmnet8 172.16.8.1/24 127.0.0.1 bind interfaces only = yes #[homes] # comment = Home Directories # valid users = %S # browseable = no # read only = no # inherit acls = yes [pdf] comment = PDF creator path = /var/tmp printable = yes print command = /usr/bin/smbprngenpdf -J '%J' -c %c -s %s -u...

...ck.c:read_data(436) The output of route is: Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 172.16.65.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 vmnet1 192.168.78.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 vmnet8 18.98.0.0 * 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo default RTR.xxx.xx 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 the Win2k machine has this routing information (note that it has 2 v...

...possible for Samba running on my Linux computer to communicate with the Windows computer, and do what I want. (They said possibly setting up port forwarding. But, the router is also a network switch for all the things attached to it.) My smb.conf file has had "interfaces = eth0 vmnet1 vmnet8", and that has been what it has used. (vmnet1 and 8 are VMWare-specific network ports). I recently changed the IP address of the Windows Vista computer to a static IP address. (It had been using a D-Link router specified DHCP address.) (So, do I now uncomment the line that says "...

...ff::2%1 > fec0:0:0:ffff::3%1 > NetBIOS über TCP/IP . . . . . . . : Aktiviert > > Ethernet-Adapter Ethernet 2: > > Verbindungsspezifisches DNS-Suffix: > Beschreibung. . . . . . . . . . . : VMware Virtual Ethernet Adapter for > VMnet8 > Physische Adresse . . . . . . . . : 00-50-56-C0-00-08 > DHCP aktiviert. . . . . . . . . . : Ja > Autokonfiguration aktiviert . . . : Ja > Verbindungslokale IPv6-Adresse . : > fe80::51d2:a7e5:1bd5:bbcd%3(Bevorzugt) > IPv4-Adresse . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.87....

...ff::2%1 > fec0:0:0:ffff::3%1 > NetBIOS über TCP/IP . . . . . . . : Aktiviert > > Ethernet-Adapter Ethernet 2: > > Verbindungsspezifisches DNS-Suffix: > Beschreibung. . . . . . . . . . . : VMware Virtual Ethernet Adapter for > VMnet8 > Physische Adresse . . . . . . . . : 00-50-56-C0-00-08 > DHCP aktiviert. . . . . . . . . . : Ja > Autokonfiguration aktiviert . . . : Ja > Verbindungslokale IPv6-Adresse . : > fe80::51d2:a7e5:1bd5:bbcd%3(Bevorzugt) > IPv4-Adresse . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.87....

Ok, what is the windows event log telling you. You should see an error. What is the description and event id. Gr. Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Mueller [mailto:mueller at tropenklinik.de] > Verzonden: dinsdag 15 maart 2016 10:31 > Aan: 'L.P.H. van Belle'; samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: AW: [Samba] Windows 10 does not register dns in samba

...d by PID 2572 (vmnet-netifup) /dev/vmnet: port on hub 8 successfully opened /dev/vmnet: open called by PID 2597 (vmnet-dhcpd) /dev/vmnet: port on hub 1 successfully opened /dev/vmnet: open called by PID 2598 (vmnet-dhcpd) /dev/vmnet: port on hub 8 successfully opened vmnet1: no IPv6 routers present vmnet8: no IPv6 routers present usb 4-6: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 2 usb 4-6: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice Initializing USB Mass Storage driver... scsi2 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass Storage devices usb-storage: device found at 2 usb-storage: waiting for device to settl...