search for: vlane

...machine via wget (~40 megs) and the rate was clamped down to about 12Kbytes/s. As this seemed too much, I gradually increased the latency up to 200ms which then gave me the expected results (~34Kbytes/s). I then applied this queuing discipline on a machine acting as a gateway/router for a few VLANed subnets. The tbf was applied on interface eth1.615. From another workstation I attempted a wget, and so the traffic had to go through the gateway/router. The download rate went from 16 Mbytes/s down to about 1.6 Mbytes/s, but was much much higher than what I''m trying to clamp it do...

We upgraded all five servers to 1.2.4. We tried trunking/notrunking. End users use an IAX2 softphone on their desktop PCs. Agents are VLANed and all IAX2 traffic is QoS'd on all LAN and WAN legs. Calls flow from the agents to the local Asterisk server as IAX2/ulaw. Then they went over the IP-VPN as IAX2/g729 (we tried ilbc and straight ulaw as well). Calls get to the PSTN from the central site via PRI on TE410P cards. Point is t...

>I can not even get IP anymore from my DHCP Hate to ask the obvious, but is the DHCP server on the same VLAN?

...w Kohlsmith Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 11:08 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Problem with chan_iax.c implimentationcausesbadaudio? On Tuesday 21 March 2006 10:55, Adam Robins wrote: > End users use an IAX2 softphone on their desktop PCs. Agents are > VLANed If there were significant changes to chan_iax2 and these were not upgraded to match, this could explain the trouble. > Point is that it worked fine for 6-9 months before the Asterisk 1.2.4 > upgrade. Oh, I understand the point. I'm not defending a protocol change causing such breaka...

On Monday 29 September 2003 20:44, DarthPeter wrote: > Hi everyone, Hello, I'm CC-ing the bridge mailing list since there are more people on that one and they might be able to shed more light. > We are trying to build a powerful firewall that could handle > several hundred megabits of traffic and we are running into a problem > with it. We'd like to be able to accomplish

If I could ask question about 10Gbit ethernet.... We have a 70 node cluster built on Centos 5.1, using NFS to mount user home areas. At the moment the network is a bottleneck, and it's going to get worse as we add another 112 CPUs in the form of two blade servers. To help things breath better, we are considering building three new NFS servers, and connecting these and the blade servers

Well FWbuilder is NOT easy. The documentation does not match the current GUI. Now the box is locked up. I will have to pull it again, hook it up to a kybd/VGA and reset iptables.... Maybe Shoreline with webmin.... Problem is I want a REAL router/firewall with little work. Both public and private nets have routable addresses. No NATing for me! I just help write the RFC ;) And all the