search for: vladuta

...ing!! I don't have other problems related to authentication, home dirs, roaming profiles, etc. Can you please give me a hint , shall I try Samba 3.0.0 ? Thank you, Cristian -----Original Message----- From: Jeremy Allison [mailto:jra@samba.org] Sent: 04 November 2003 18:22 To: Vladuta Cristian Cc: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] very odd behavior for concurrent file access in Samba3.0.0 with MS Word On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 12:22:34PM +0200, Vladuta Cristian wrote: > > Leaving all locks/oplocks by default, there is no way of preventing a second MSWord...

Hello, I just installed Samba 3.0.0 on RH9 and began testing the concurrent file access behavior. Leaving all locks/oplocks by default, there is no way of preventing a second MSWord user from opening an already open file with no warning message (in a MS network the message would normally be " ..test.doc is already open by ...Do you want to make a copy?")!! No such thing with Samba,

Dear All , I am re-posting after a couple of weeks the following issue related to MS Word and Samba 3.0 hoping that this time somebody could help me unlock the mystery. I have installed Samba 3.0 rpm on RH 9 and cannot get past an elementary file lock issue such as opening a file through MS WORD by multiple users from different MS workstations (w2k, XP,W98, etc) in concurrent sessions. Nobody

Do you know what can cause the smbd process to steal out the cpu usage (99%) and keep running like that for days? I have a Samba PDC 3.0.1pre3 running on top of RH9 2.4.20 kernel. Below is the current top report. Strangely, the PDC still responds in reasonable good response times to heavy network duty.traced the log.%machine name% and didn't find anything . I haven't tried to restart smb

...pels for smb.conf. Read the man pages. Personaly I recommend everybody to read man smb.conf form the fist to the last line. Christian _______________________________________________________________________ In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN) Return-Path: <VladutaC@ca-ib.com> Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org Received: from vie-cs3.ca-ib.com (mail1.ca-ib.com [212.27.124.49]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DABB4C12 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 23:44:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by vie-cs3.ca-ib.com with Internet Mail S...

I am running a Samba 3 - Atalk environment for a large number of MAC / PC clients. How can I make umask changes affecting all users ( 002 for instance) to stay permanent (not being reset to default values at server restart) ? Do I have to edit the /etc/profile file accordingly? How? Thanks, Cristian