search for: vla

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 124 matches for "vla".

Did you mean: va
2011 May 20
1
DocumentTermMatrix - text minig
...ata.frame to Corpus or VCorpus. Globina ACKlasifikacija Opis GlobinaOd GlobinaDo Vodja 3671 8 GP SLABO GRADUIRAN PE©ÈEN PROD DO r = 70 mm, PREVLADUJE DO r = 30 mm, GOST, SIV 0.30 4.05 Beljsak 3675 12 GP SLABO GRADUIRAN PE©ÈEN PROD DO r = 80mm, PREVLADUJE DO r = 30mm, GOST, VLA®EN DO MOKER, SIV 0.40 7.50 Kovacic 3684 8 GP SLABO GRADUIRAN PE©ÈEN PROD DO r =...
2010 Oct 27
3
[LLVMdev] Scalar Evolution not canonalizing division?
...for (i = 0; i < n; ++i) for (j = 0; j < m; ++j) A[i][j] = 1; return A[42][42]; } This produces after applying -mem2reg the attached LLVM-IR. For the store to the array A in the loop I get this scalar evolution function: {((8 * ({0,+,(8 * %m)}<%for.cond> /u 8)) + %vla),+,8}<%for.cond5> For me it seems the devision by "8" is not canonical. Is there any reason this can not be simplified to: {((1 * ({0,+,(1 * %m)}<%for.cond>)) + %vla),+,8}<%for.cond5> which is actually this: {(({0,+,%m}<%for.cond>) + %vla),+,8}<%for.cond5&g...
2018 Mar 13
2
[PATCH v2] drm/nouveau/secboot: remove VLA usage
In preparation to enabling -Wvla, remove VLA. In this particular case directly use macro NVKM_MSGQUEUE_CMDLINE_SIZE instead of local variable cmdline_size. Also, remove cmdline_size as it is not actually useful anymore. The use of stack Variable Length Arrays needs to be avoided, as they can be a vector for stack exhaustion, whic...
2018 Mar 16
2
[PATCH v2] drm/nouveau/secboot: remove VLA usage
On 14 March 2018 at 21:08, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 11:24:11AM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: >> In preparation to enabling -Wvla, remove VLA. In this particular >> case directly use macro NVKM_MSGQUEUE_CMDLINE_SIZE instead of local >> variable cmdline_size. Also, remove cmdline_size as it is not >> actually useful anymore. >> >> The use of stack Variable Length Arrays needs to be avoided, as the...
2018 Mar 13
2
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/secboot: remove VLA usage
In preparation to enabling -Wvla, remove VLA. In this particular case directly use macro NVKM_MSGQUEUE_CMDLINE_SIZE instead of local variable cmdline_size. Also, remove cmdline_size as it is not actually useful anymore. The use of stack Variable Length Arrays needs to be avoided, as they can be a vector for stack exhaustion, whic...
2006 Feb 09
0
I need help on VICIDIAL and auto dial
...ing Asterisk 1.2.4 and astguiclient 1.1.8 ...thanks for the help |SELECT count(*) FROM vicidial_auto_calls where status = 'LIVE' and server_ip='127.0.0.1' and campaign_id = '' and call_time < "" and lead_id != '';| -- VDAD get agent: |0|update of vla table: |127.0.0.1 |UPDATE vicidial_live_agents set status='QUEUE',lead_id='0',uniqueid=' 1139414618.5', channel='IAX2/u32218094-6', callerid='unknown' where status = 'READY' and server_ip='127.0.0.1' and campaign_id='' and last_update_...
2018 May 23
2
[PATCH v2] drm/nouveau/secboot: remove VLA usage
...Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 7:05 PM, Ben Skeggs <skeggsb at gmail.com> wrote: >> On 14 March 2018 at 21:08, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 11:24:11AM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: >>>> In preparation to enabling -Wvla, remove VLA. In this particular >>>> case directly use macro NVKM_MSGQUEUE_CMDLINE_SIZE instead of local >>>> variable cmdline_size. Also, remove cmdline_size as it is not >>>> actually useful anymore. >>>> >>>> The use of stack Variable L...
2006 Feb 09
1
Re: Help on Vicidial
...ver CLI, I reall hope some one can help me out on this one. thanks |SELECT count(*) FROM vicidial_auto_calls where status = 'LIVE' and server_ip='127.0.0.1' and campaign_id = '' and call_time < "" and lead_id != '';| -- VDAD get agent: |0|update of vla table: |127.0.0.1 |UPDATE vicidial_live_agents set status='QUEUE',lead_id='0',uniqueid=' 1139506471.2', channel='IAX2/u32218094-1', callerid='unknown' where status = 'READY' and server_ip='127.0.0.1' and campaign_id='' and last_updat...
2008 Apr 20
0
[LLVMdev] Global variable-length array
On Apr 19, 2008, at 22:45, Talin wrote: > Suppose I have a global variable which points to a constant, > variable length array. This is somewhat contradictory. Do you want an 'vla *g;' in C? If so, your global will be of type %vla** (you'll load a pointer to the array from the global). Its initializer would be a bitcast of a global which has some type similar to %vla. If not, and you indeed want a global of type %vla*, read on… > The question is, how can...
2019 Mar 13
2
Scalable Vector Types in IR - Next Steps?
Disclaimer: I’m only speaking for myself, not Apple. This is really disappointing. Resorting to multi-versioned fixed length vectorization isn’t a solution that’s competitive with the native VLA support, so it doesn’t look like a credible alternative suggestion (at least not without elaborating it on the mailing list). Without a practical alternative, it’s essentially saying “no” to a whole class of vector architectures of which SVE is only one. Amara > On Mar 13, 2019, at 9:04 AM, Gr...
2018 Mar 14
0
[PATCH v2] drm/nouveau/secboot: remove VLA usage
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 11:24:11AM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > In preparation to enabling -Wvla, remove VLA. In this particular > case directly use macro NVKM_MSGQUEUE_CMDLINE_SIZE instead of local > variable cmdline_size. Also, remove cmdline_size as it is not > actually useful anymore. > > The use of stack Variable Length Arrays needs to be avoided, as they > can be a vec...
2018 Apr 26
0
[PATCH v2] drm/nouveau/secboot: remove VLA usage
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 7:05 PM, Ben Skeggs <skeggsb at gmail.com> wrote: > On 14 March 2018 at 21:08, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 11:24:11AM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: >>> In preparation to enabling -Wvla, remove VLA. In this particular >>> case directly use macro NVKM_MSGQUEUE_CMDLINE_SIZE instead of local >>> variable cmdline_size. Also, remove cmdline_size as it is not >>> actually useful anymore. >>> >>> The use of stack Variable Length Arrays needs t...
2018 May 24
0
[PATCH v2] drm/nouveau/secboot: remove VLA usage
..., 2018 at 7:05 PM, Ben Skeggs <skeggsb at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 14 March 2018 at 21:08, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 11:24:11AM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: >>>>> In preparation to enabling -Wvla, remove VLA. In this particular >>>>> case directly use macro NVKM_MSGQUEUE_CMDLINE_SIZE instead of local >>>>> variable cmdline_size. Also, remove cmdline_size as it is not >>>>> actually useful anymore. >>>>> >>>>> The use...
2018 Mar 13
0
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/secboot: remove VLA usage
Hi David, On 03/13/2018 11:10 AM, David Laight wrote: > From: Gustavo A. R. Silva >> Sent: 13 March 2018 14:48 >> In preparation to enabling -Wvla, remove VLA. In this particular >> case directly use macro NVKM_MSGQUEUE_CMDLINE_SIZE instead of local >> variable cmdline_size. Also, remove cmdline_size as it is not >> actually useful anymore. > ... >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/ls_ucode_m...
2018 Mar 13
0
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/secboot: remove VLA usage
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva > Sent: 13 March 2018 14:48 > In preparation to enabling -Wvla, remove VLA. In this particular > case directly use macro NVKM_MSGQUEUE_CMDLINE_SIZE instead of local > variable cmdline_size. Also, remove cmdline_size as it is not > actually useful anymore. ... > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/ls_ucode_msgqueue.c > b/driv...
2018 Jun 22
0
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/secboot/acr: Remove VLA usage
...22, 2018 at 11:34 PM, Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 10:50 AM, Karol Herbst <kherbst at redhat.com> wrote: >> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 7:24 PM, Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org> wrote: >>> In the quest to remove all stack VLA usage from the kernel[1], this >>> allocates the working buffers before starting the writing so it won't >>> abort in the middle. This needs an initial walk of the lists to figure >>> out how large the buffer should be. >>> >>> [1] https://lkml.kerne...
2019 Mar 13
2
Scalable Vector Types in IR - Next Steps?
...ov> wrote: > On 3/13/19 1:45 PM, Amara Emerson via llvm-dev wrote: > > Disclaimer: I’m only speaking for myself, not Apple. > > > > This is really disappointing. Resorting to multi-versioned fixed length > vectorization isn’t a solution that’s competitive with the native VLA > support, so it doesn’t look like a credible alternative suggestion (at > least not without elaborating it on the mailing list). Without a practical > alternative, it’s essentially saying “no” to a whole class of vector > architectures of which SVE is only one. > > > To the ex...
2018 Jun 22
0
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/secboot/acr: Remove VLA usage
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 7:24 PM, Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org> wrote: > In the quest to remove all stack VLA usage from the kernel[1], this > allocates the working buffers before starting the writing so it won't > abort in the middle. This needs an initial walk of the lists to figure > out how large the buffer should be. > > [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFzCG-zNmZwX4A2FQpadafLfEzK...
2010 Oct 28
0
[LLVMdev] Scalar Evolution not canonalizing division?
...; j < m; ++j) > A[i][j] = 1; > > return A[42][42]; > } > > This produces after applying -mem2reg the attached LLVM-IR. > > For the store to the array A in the loop I get this scalar evolution > function: > > {((8 * ({0,+,(8 * %m)}<%for.cond> /u 8)) + %vla),+,8}<%for.cond5> > > For me it seems the devision by "8" is not canonical. Is there any reason > this can not be simplified to: > > {((1 * ({0,+,(1 * %m)}<%for.cond>)) + %vla),+,8}<%for.cond5> > Because we have to assume 2's complement arithmetic....
2019 Mar 13
4
Scalable Vector Types in IR - Next Steps?
...in private is asking to get bad reviews in public, as the SVE process has shown *over and over again*. I don't understand why, after so many problems for so many years, this is still the modus operandi... > The basic argument was that they didn't believe the value gained from enabling VLA autovectorization was worth the added complexity in maintaining the codebase. They were open to changing their minds if we could demonstrate sufficient demand for the feature. In that case, the current patches to change the IR should be abandoned, as well as reverting the previous change to the ty...