search for: vk4msl

On 18/8/23 18:37, Jochen Bern wrote: > On 18.08.23 07:39, Darren Tucker wrote: >> On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 at 15:25, Stuart Longland VK4MSL <me at vk4msl.com> >> wrote: >> [...] >>> The crux of this is that we cannot assume the local IPv4 address is >>> unique, since it's not (and in many cases, not even static). >> >> If the IP address is not significant, you can tell ssh to not rec...

On 18.08.23 07:39, Darren Tucker wrote: > On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 at 15:25, Stuart Longland VK4MSL <me at vk4msl.com> wrote: > [...] >> The crux of this is that we cannot assume the local IPv4 address is >> unique, since it's not (and in many cases, not even static). > > If the IP address is not significant, you can tell ssh to not record > them ("CheckHos...

On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 at 15:25, Stuart Longland VK4MSL <me at vk4msl.com> wrote: [...] > The crux of this is that we cannot assume the local IPv4 address is > unique, since it's not (and in many cases, not even static). If the IP address is not significant, you can tell ssh to not record them ("CheckHostIP no"). [...] > H...

...indicate this feature has been around since at least 2017, so should not cause compatibility issues with the other users. No problems, I just tried it out, and already, things are a _lot_ more sane. I'll give it a try more long-term and see how it fares. -- Stuart Longland (aka Redhatter, VK4MSL) I haven't lost my mind... ...it's backed up on a tape somewhere.

On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 at 17:18, Stuart Longland VK4MSL <me at vk4msl.com> wrote: > On 18/8/23 15:39, Darren Tucker wrote: [...] > > I think you just need "HostKeyAlias mytarget" here. > > Ahh, in my scanning through the `ssh_config` manpage, I missed this, and > change logs seem to indicate this feature has been around...

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87819 Bug ID: 87819 Summary: [NVAC] EQ overflowing Product: Mesa Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: medium Component: Drivers/DRI/nouveau Assignee: nouveau at

...ing that repository was protected and "trusted", it would enable all members of a team to automatically "trust" the host key with minimal infrastructure set-up. Are any of the above ideas feasible? Did I miss an obvious solution to this? -- Stuart Longland (aka Redhatter, VK4MSL) I haven't lost my mind... ...it's backed up on a tape somewhere.

On 19/8/23 08:00, Stuart Longland VK4MSL wrote: > Would the UserKnownHostsFile be relative to the current working > directory of the `ssh` process at the time of its call, or would it > figure out that these files are relative to > /home/me/workplace/ops/eng-ssh/bigcust-config? Nope? just tried it, at this time it's re...

Hello All, wondering if anyone knows of any reliable mirrors to download asterisk from in Australia or somewhere close to it than having to download stuff all the way from the US? Cheers, \R -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20110307/54049f18/attachment.htm>

...to /etc/asterisk/phone.conf, but nothing there jumps out at me as being an obvious means for configuring a modem ? nor can I find where it's documented on the Asterisk wiki. Where abouts should I look for documentation on configuring these modules? Regards, -- Stuart Longland (aka Redhatter, VK4MSL) .'''. Gentoo Linux/MIPS Cobalt and Docs Developer '.'` : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .'.' http://dev.gentoo.org/~redhatter :.' I haven't lost my mind... ...it's backed up on a tape somewhere.

Hello all, Figured I'd repost this with an edited subject line, to attract attention of people with Debian On Sparc experience. Apologies in advance if this kind of thing is frowned upon :) [AR] hash/hash.o hash/hash_bigkey.o hash/hash_buf.o hash/hash_func.o hash/hash_log2.o hash/hash_page.o hash/ndbm.o btree/bt_close.o btree/bt_conv.o btree/bt_debug.o btree/bt_delete.o btree/bt_get.o

I have a small LAN at home with nine or ten systems on it running various varieties of Linux. I 'do things' on the LAN either from my dekstop machine or from my laptop, both run Xubuntu 24.04 at the moment. There's a couple of headless systems on the LAN where login security is important to me and I've been thinking about the relative merits of password and public-key