search for: vitalybuka

...more love and care. > > > > > > Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting > > > AnnotatedCommand. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Galina > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 2:57 PM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com > > > <mailto:vitalybuka at google.com>> wrote: > > > > > > It looks like all sanitizer builder are still offline > > > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders > > > > > > On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 at 00:34, Galina Kistan...

...t;> >>> Hexagon QA <llvm.buildmaster at quicinc.com <mailto:llvm.buildmaster at quicinc.com>> >>> hexagon-build-02 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.9.2-10ubuntu13) 4.9.2 >>> hexagon-build-03 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.9.2-10ubuntu13) 4.9.2 >>> >>> Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com <mailto:vitalybuka at google.com>> >>> sanitizer-buildbot6 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04.3) 4.8.4 >>> >>> Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com <mailto:rnk at google.com>> >>> sanitizer-windows -- Microsoft (R) Visual Studio (...

...We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but it will > need more love and care. > > Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting > AnnotatedCommand. > > Thanks > > Galina > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 2:57 PM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com > <mailto:vitalybuka at google.com>> wrote: > > It looks like all sanitizer builder are still offline > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders > > On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 at 00:34, Galina Kistanova via cfe-commits > <cfe-commits at lists.llv...

...Studio (R) 2015 (14.0) > ps4-buildslave2 -- Microsoft (R) Visual Studio (R) 2015 (14.0) > > Hexagon QA <llvm.buildmaster at quicinc.com> > hexagon-build-02 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.9.2-10ubuntu13) 4.9.2 > hexagon-build-03 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.9.2-10ubuntu13) 4.9.2 > > Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> > sanitizer-buildbot6 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04.3) 4.8.4 > > Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> > sanitizer-windows -- Microsoft (R) Visual Studio (R) 2015 (14.0) > > Ilia Taraban <mstester.llvm at gmail.com> > windows7-buildbot -- Microso...

...n and call to q(), without LTO we can't remove that store. 2. shortcut which I have which ignores all instructions q() . this assume that memset to acpar.match, acpar.matchinfo also useful which is not true. I should be able to improve this case. On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 11:29 PM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote: > On a first look case like this should nor be a problem. The tail of the > memset here is unused because it's replaced immediately without reads . So > it can be trimmed. I will try the patch and let you know. > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 9:51 AM Alexande...

...mailto:aemerson at apple.com>> > Date: Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 12:10 PM > To: Vitaly Buka > Cc: Alexander Potapenko, llvm-dev, Peter Collingbourne > > Can you post numbers for how many stores get eliminated from CTMark? > >> On Apr 16, 2019, at 11:45 AM, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com <mailto:vitalybuka at google.com>> wrote: >> >> I tried -Os and effect of new approach significantly increases. >> I run regular DSE and immediately myDSE. With -Os myDSE removes more than 50% of DSE number. >> Which is expected as -Os inlines less an...

Switched all but PPC, I don't have access to them. But they run the same script as sanitizer-x86_64-linux. http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 19:19, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote: > We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It should be > a functional equivalent of the old one. > We need to stress

Can you post numbers for how many stores get eliminated from CTMark? > On Apr 16, 2019, at 11:45 AM, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote: > > I tried -Os and effect of new approach significantly increases. > I run regular DSE and immediately myDSE. With -Os myDSE removes more than 50% of DSE number. > Which is expected as -Os inlines less and regular DSE can't remove over function call. >...

vitalybuka, sanitizer-x86_64-linux-gn is _still_ on http://lab.llvm.org:8011/console . Can we please get it removed? On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 7:07 AM Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org> wrote: > https://reviews.llvm.org/D63909 landed. Maybe it needs a master restart > to have an effect? > >...

...gt; Thanks Vitaly and Peter, > > I went with a modified version of the instructions from > https://github.com/google/sanitizers/wiki/MemorySanitizerBootstrappingClang > — that’s a very helpful set of instructions! > > Cheers > > > On 31 Aug 2018, at 02:55, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote: > > > > Another option is just to run corresponding script from > https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/zorg/trunk/zorg/buildbot/builders/sanitizers/ > in empty directory. > > > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 5:00 AM Peter Smith via llvm-dev < > l...

...:sort that handles the >>>>>> rule priorities in generating the source file and will also make it simpler >>>>>> for the compiler to compile it. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 21 May 2017, at 11:16, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com <mailto:vitalybuka at google.com>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> It must be r303341, I commented on corresponding llvm-commits thread. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 7:34 AM, Diana Picus via llvm-dev >...

It looks like all sanitizer builder are still offline http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 at 00:34, Galina Kistanova via cfe-commits < cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > The staging buildbot was up and running for 6 days now, and looks good. > > Tomorrow at 12:00 PM PDT we will switch the production buildbot to the new >

...he Builtins-aarch64-linux test failures have disappeared after I set the PATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variables to point to $HOME/stage1/bin and $HOME/stage1/lib. But I still see the tools/gold/X86 and OpenMP test failures. Thanks, -- Bryan On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 3:03 PM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote: > Can you please share the full cmake command line? > > On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 at 11:28, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: > >> +Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> to help with the links to build >> bots. >> Not sure if...

...ous is to group rules by their top-level gMIR > instruction. This would reduce the cost of the std::sort that handles the > rule priorities in generating the source file and will also make it simpler > for the compiler to compile it. > > > On 21 May 2017, at 11:16, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote: > > It must be r303341, I commented on corresponding llvm-commits thread. > > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 7:34 AM, Diana Picus via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Ok, thanks. I'll try to do a bisect next week to see if I...

...p-level gMIR >> instruction. This would reduce the cost of the std::sort that handles the >> rule priorities in generating the source file and will also make it >> simpler >> for the compiler to compile it. >> >> >> On 21 May 2017, at 11:16, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote: >> >> It must be r303341, I commented on corresponding llvm-commits thread. >> >> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 7:34 AM, Diana Picus via llvm-dev >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> >> Ok, thanks. I'll try to do a...

Yes, zlib build for LTO will work, but user will have to build this lib from zlib source code anyway. On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 4:01 PM Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > > On Sep 23, 2016, at 1:44 PM, Vitaly Buka via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Is it possible to add zlib source code into llvm repo? Any advice on how

...ous is to group rules by their top-level gMIR > instruction. This would reduce the cost of the std::sort that handles the > rule priorities in generating the source file and will also make it simpler > for the compiler to compile it. > > > On 21 May 2017, at 11:16, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote: > > It must be r303341, I commented on corresponding llvm-commits thread. > > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 7:34 AM, Diana Picus via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > Ok, thanks. I'll try to do a bisect next week to see if I ca...

...crosoft (R) Visual Studio (R) 2015 (14.0) > > Hexagon QA <llvm.buildmaster at quicinc.com <mailto:llvm.buildmaster at quicinc.com>> > hexagon-build-02 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.9.2-10ubuntu13) 4.9.2 > hexagon-build-03 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.9.2-10ubuntu13) 4.9.2 > > Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com <mailto:vitalybuka at google.com>> > sanitizer-buildbot6 -- gcc (Ubuntu 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04.3) 4.8.4 > > Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com <mailto:rnk at google.com>> > sanitizer-windows -- Microsoft (R) Visual Studio (R) 2015 (14.0) > > Ilia T...

...the cost of the std::sort that handles the >>>>> rule priorities in generating the source file and will also make it simpler >>>>> for the compiler to compile it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 21 May 2017, at 11:16, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> It must be r303341, I commented on corresponding llvm-commits thread. >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 7:34 AM, Diana Picus via llvm-dev >>>>> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrot...

...t;>> instruction. This would reduce the cost of the std::sort that handles the >>> rule priorities in generating the source file and will also make it simpler >>> for the compiler to compile it. >>> >>> >>> On 21 May 2017, at 11:16, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote: >>> >>> It must be r303341, I commented on corresponding llvm-commits thread. >>> >>> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 7:34 AM, Diana Picus via llvm-dev >>> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> Ok, t...