search for: visualdsp++

...the prompt reply. Basically, what I have to do is to run a speex coder/decoder on a Blackfin processor, on top of the microC/OS II kernel. I wish I could use uclinux, since I'm familiar with Linux, but this doesn't depend on me. You said that the assembly code is written for gcc, not for VisualDSP++. Furthermore, in the link you sent me, the instructions refer to compiling for gcc & uclinux. Based on this, I have some questions: 1. Is it possible to compile the library in VisualDSP++? If so, do I have to generate a makefile or there is some way of using the makefile used by gcc? 2. Can...

Hi I'm trying to integrate your speex codec on our custom Blackfin board and without uCLinux. I am using ADI-supplied VisualDSP++ IDE and corresponding toolchain. My question is: Is there anybody who ported speex with enabled BFIN_ASM to VisualDSP++ ? Best Regards, Stefan Voss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/200802...

Hi Jean-Marc I'm trying to integrate your speex codec on our custom Blackfin board. The board is not uCLinux compatible and there is no chance that it will ever be. I am using ADI-supplied VisualDSP++ IDE and corresponding toolchain. As long as I am compiling "C"-only version of the library everything is fine. VisualDSP++ produces working library. There is only one not so minor problem - the library is slow. However when I'm trying to compiler with inline assembler the compilatio...

Robin Getz a ?crit : > On Tue 19 Feb 2008 11:14, Voss, Stefan, AEAV22 pondered: >> I'm trying to integrate your speex codec on our custom Blackfin board and >> without uCLinux. I am using ADI-supplied VisualDSP++ IDE and corresponding >> toolchain. My question is: Is there anybody who ported speex with enabled >> BFIN_ASM to VisualDSP++ ? > > Nope - two choices: > - check out using gcc for your entire project > - use the old version of speex that is avaliable as a VDSP downl...

-----Original Message----- From: Robin Getz [mailto:rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org] Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2007 12:11 AM To: Michael Shatz Cc: speex-dev@xiph.org Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] Blackfin inline assembler and VisualDSP++ toolchain >On Wed 13 Jun 2007 12:37, Michael Shatz pondered: >> >> Hi Jean-Marc >> >> I'm trying to integrate your speex codec on our custom Blackfin board. The >> board is not uCLinux compatible and there is no chance that it will ever be. > >I ne...

> >Actually, you're the first I know using the VisualDSP++ toolchain :-) > I guess that's because speex has pretty big memory footprint. So developers that integrate speex tend to have plenty of RAM and once one has plenty of RAM he could install biggish OS. And between biggish OSes for Blackfin the most popular choice is uCLinux. And ucLinux wo...

...miliar with programming/compiling/linking at all, but I guess the first thing I need is libspeex compiled for Blackfin, so that my program can use the library functions. I've downloaded the source files (version 1.1.10) from www.speex.org and I've been trying to compile libspeex from within VisualDSP++, but it has not worked so far. I wonder if somebody could give me some hint on this issue. Any help will be very welcome. Thank you guys very much in advance, Adriano _______________________________________________________ Novo Yahoo! Messenger com voz: liga??es, Yahoo! Avatars, n...

...met any hardware that gcc could not run code on. toolchains have >> >nothing do with embedded OSes. >> >> That's true. Add some postprocessing, program binary into flash and >> code would run. But you likely would not be able to use non-gnu tools >> like all VisualDSP++ jtag-based stuff that makes the life of developer >> easier. > >Yes - you would use the JTAG-based GNU Tools that makes life of a developer easier. > >http://www.section5.ch/icebear > In the next incarnation, may be. Right now I am leaving Blackfin for good. If the current...

-----Original Message----- From: Jean-Marc Valin [mailto:jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca] Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 11:17 PM To: Michael Shatz Cc: speex-dev@xiph.org Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] Blackfin inline assembler and VisualDSP++ toolchain Michael Shatz a ?crit : >>> Actually, you're the first I know using the VisualDSP++ toolchain >>> :-) >> >> I guess that's because speex has pretty big memory footprint. > >Actually, you'll find that the data footprint in the lastest v...

From: Jim Crichton [mailto:jim.crichton@comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 10:47 PM > >For TI DSPs, I used a private memory array rather than the C stack, and a >debug patch in stack_alloc.h to measure the scratch usage: > >#if 1 >extern char *spxGlobalScratchFree; >#define ALLOC(var, size, type) (var = PUSH(stack, size, type),

> I am trying to port speex lib to Blackfin processor. > I am using VisualDSP++ 4.0. I've never used VisualDSP++ 4.0. All the development on Blackfin has been done with gcc, which may explain some problems with the inline asm. Does VisualDSP++ support a syntax close to what gcc uses (with constraints) or more like the MS compilers. > If I am compiling source codes w...

Hello! I'v downloaded speex lib 1.1.11.1. I am trying to port speex lib to Blackfin processor. I am using VisualDSP++ 4.0. If I am compiling source codes with using floating point everything ok. When I am compiling with FIXED_POINT defined everything's ok and code works about two times faster. But when I am defining BFIN_ASM I am getting several compiling errors in Blackfin assembler functions. Here they are...

-----Original Message----- From: Jean-Marc Valin [mailto:jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 6:38 PM To: Michael Shatz Cc: speex-dev@xiph.org Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] Blackfin inline assembler and VisualDSP++ toolchain >> Yes, data footprint in the new version is quite manageable. Still I would >> wish better documentation for speex_alloc_scratch(). > >I'll be waiting for your patch :-) I didn't realize that you accept patches for documentation, too. > >> It to...

Hi, I think the (small) readme has been accidentally omitted from the tarball. You can get it at http://svn.xiph.org/trunk/speex/README.blackfin Note however that all the assembly is written for gcc, not VisualDSP++. Jean-Marc Le jeudi 29 septembre 2005 ? 21:24 +0000, Adriano Vilela Barbosa a ?crit : > Hi all, > > I'm trying to run speex on the Blackfin processor. I'm not familiar > with programming/compiling/linking at all, but I guess the first thing > I need is libspeex compiled...

...al C++ 2010 .pdb files in large app; "Unsupported type 1404 in STRUCT field list" 31922 64-bit Total Commander 8.x crashes when viewing image files via with 'Imagine' plugin v1.08 33012 FAST Search for Sharepoint MOSS 2010 Query Tool only displays a black background 33888 VisualDSP++ 5.0 debugger needs atl80.dll.AtlIPersistPropertyBag_Save 34262 dbghelp: Unhandled Tag type 0x26 for backtraces in xul.dll 34517 Burnout Paradise crashes when trying to connect to server (needs support for Win32_SystemEnclosure WMI class) 34930 Cygwin-compiled Hello World program couldn...