search for: visualc

Hi all, I just wanted to know if anyone's looked into using the free version of Microsoft's Visual C++ toolkit for LLVM: http://msdn.microsoft.com/visualc/vctoolkit2003/ -bw -- || "If wishes and buts were clusters of nuts, we'd all have a bowl of || granola!" - Mr. Jellineck

I just found this: http://msdn.microsoft.com/visualc/vctoolkit2003/ I don''t tend to pay much attention to Microsoft and MS Windows, so perhaps everyone else already knew about it. Basically, they have released a command-line-only version of their C++ compiler and libraries for free (gratis) downloading. I assume this version would be ab...

...equirements. It just struck me as > amusing that visual c++ people need boost then. > This is getting slightly off-topic (we're now talking about mocking libraries, rather than unittesting), but Visual Studio 2008 has a free add-on pack to add TR1 support: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/visualc/default.aspx (see the downloads section). -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20081227/470d541f/attachment.html>

Hi All, I have downloaded the Vorbis Codec source code for Windows. How do I compile, build and run it? Do I need VisualC compiler for that? Also, please tell me how do I test it? Is there a easier way of accomplishing the above in Linux? Thanks, Niranjan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/vorbis-dev/attachments/20090822/ecc889a2/attac...

On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Bill Wendling wrote: > I just wanted to know if anyone's looked into using the free version of > Microsoft's Visual C++ toolkit for LLVM: > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/visualc/vctoolkit2003/ Sorry, but it is not even close to working (its template and STL support is horribly lacking). The Visual Studio "Whidbey" compiler, now in beta, will handle it though with only a reasonable amount of tweaking to the LLVM sources. I have no idea about when Microsoft int...

...an you point me to that? > Anyway, on Microsoft side, basically you HAVE to reinstall Windows > every 150gg as it starts collapsing ;-))) I cannot find any specific instructions for uninstalling the VC++ 2005 Express Edition. There is this README file: http://lab.msdn.microsoft.com/express/visualc/readme/default.aspx. As it isn't the full Visual Studio it probably isn't messing around with Windows system files. I do know for a fact that the Visual Studio .NET beta years ago could not be uninstalled without reformatting. It stopped me from installing it.

On Sep 15, 2004, at 8:04 PM, Jeff Cohen wrote: > I cannot find any specific instructions for uninstalling the VC++ 2005 > Express Edition. There is this README file: > http://lab.msdn.microsoft.com/express/visualc/readme/default.aspx. As > it isn't the full Visual Studio it probably isn't messing around with > Windows system files. > > I do know for a fact that the Visual Studio .NET beta years ago could > not be uninstalled without reformatting. It stopped me from installing > it...

On Sep 15, 2004, at 7:29 PM, Jeff Cohen wrote: > Just make sure you read the uninstall instructions before installing. > Microsoft has been known to essentially require the reformatting your > boot partition in order to uninstall beta versions of VS. And, of > course, it is required that you uninstall the beta before installing a > newer beta or the release version. Urrggg! I

...struck > me as amusing that visual c++ people need boost then. > > This is getting slightly off-topic (we're now talking about mocking > libraries, rather than unittesting), but Visual Studio 2008 has a > free add-on pack to add TR1 support: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/visualc/default.aspx > (see the downloads section). > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev Just wanted to mention that the add-on pac...

Hi, Have you tried the new VC8 Beta? It's been out for less than 2 weeks: http://lab.msdn.microsoft.com/express/visualc/default.aspx It's supposed to have improved standards compliance. Regards, -Eugene Talagrand On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Chris Lattner wrote: > Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 01:56:03 -0500 (CDT) > From: Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> > Reply-To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > To: llvmde...

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Bill Wendling wrote: > > I just wanted to know if anyone's looked into using the free version of > > Microsoft's Visual C++ toolkit for LLVM: > > > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/visualc/vctoolkit2003/ > > Sorry, but it is not even close to working (its template and STL support > is horribly lacking). The Visual Studio "Whidbey" compiler, now in beta, > will handle it though with only a reasonable amount of tweaking to the > LLVM sources. I have no idea...

...s display a small empty window, with a context menu that only allows the user to open LG site in a browser. I went looking for another firmware updater, and I found this: http://lgodd.lge.com/fwdrv/DVD-WRITER/GSA4163A106.exe It failed to run at first, because of missing MFC42.DLL, so I downloaded VisualC redistributables (vcredist.exe) from MS and installed it. The updater launched, but it could not find my drive. I tried again, this time with a mounted CD inside, and the drive was found! Unfortunately, the update itself does not work with CD inside, and wine locked the drive - I could unmount it,...

On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Vladimir Prus wrote: > > Sorry, but it is not even close to working (its template and STL support > > is horribly lacking). The Visual Studio "Whidbey" compiler, now in beta, > > will handle it though with only a reasonable amount of tweaking to the > > LLVM sources. I have no idea about when Microsoft intends to release it > > though,

>> ...snip... > > Also for a note of reference, your links to the examples are the > most advanced samples. So boost can do more, thus has more weight/ > bloat behind it. > > Were the other test kits looked at? Is gtest the best solution for > the project. > > Is this something your planning as putting in the tree, thus require > pulling in changes from

On Sep 15, 2004, at 8:40 AM, Henrik Bach wrote: > Hi, > > Has some one committed these patches into CVS? Not yet... checked 10 minutes ago... I'm attaching the cvs diff -u version of them (I've read Reid Spencer post about it) > Paolo, thanks for the patches. In the near future I'll try to compile > them. > > I've installed STLport 6.4.2 with vc6. May I

...RL_ParseUrl failed to parse L"System.Configuration" fixme:sync:CreateMemoryResourceNotification (0) stub fixme:shell:URL_ParseUrl failed to parse L"System.Data" fixme:shell:URL_ParseUrl failed to parse L"System" fixme:shell:URL_ParseUrl failed to parse L"Microsoft.VisualC" fixme:shell:URL_ParseUrl failed to parse L"System.Xml" fixme:shell:URL_ParseUrl failed to parse L"System.Transactions" fixme:shell:URL_ParseUrl failed to parse L"System.EnterpriseServices" fixme:shell:URL_ParseUrl failed to parse L"System.Configuration"...

...t;CustomMarshalers" fixme:shell:URL_ParseUrl failed to parse L"CustomMarshalers" fixme:shell:URL_ParseUrl failed to parse L"mscorlib.resources" fixme:shell:URL_ParseUrl failed to parse L"mscorlib.resources" fixme:shell:URL_ParseUrl failed to parse L"Microsoft.VisualC" fixme:shell:URL_ParseUrl failed to parse L"" fixme:shell:URL_ParseUrl failed to parse L"InfoUtetDotNet" fixme:shell:URL_ParseUrl failed to parse L"System.Windows.Forms" fixme:shell:URL_ParseUrl failed to parse L"System.Windows.Forms" fixme:shell:URL_Par...

Hi, Has some one committed these patches into CVS? Paolo, thanks for the patches. In the near future I'll try to compile them. I've installed STLport 6.4.2 with vc6. Henrik --- Got Freedom? Software Freedom Day 2004 - 28th of August http://www.softwarefreedomday.org/ --- >From: Paolo Invernizzi <arathorn at fastwebnet.it> >Reply-To: LLVM Developers Mailing List

...orked with it over LLVM... Yes, in fact I'd be daring enough to suggest that it be the standard. We'll have fewer compilation problems with VC++ 2005 because it is (supposedly) more standards compliant than previous versions. Please use this download: http://lab.msdn.microsoft.com/express/visualc/default.aspx There is also an update, as of 9/10/2004: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=afd04ff1-9d16-439a-9a5e-e13eb0341923&DisplayLang=en This is the compiler I will use for the Win32 port (when I get to it). > > <gossip> I've read that an MSIL fro...

On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Mark Kromis <greybird at mac.com> wrote: > > On Dec 27, 2008, at 7:41 PM, Misha Brukman wrote: > > 2008/12/27 Mark Kromis <greybird at mac.com> > >> Just a curiosity question, why push for gtest vs Boost Test or >> a different test suite? >> I normally use Boost, and their test suite, so I'm more familiar with