search for: visitshiftinst

...sbyte]* %.str_1, .......... > %tmp.0.i = call int (sbyte*, ...)* > %printf(%tmp.1 , ......... While this is feasible and possible, I really wouldn't recommend it. Take a look at how the X86 backend handles this stuff. For shift instructions, for example, we have: void ISel::visitShiftInst(ShiftInst &I) { MachineBasicBlock::iterator IP = BB->end(); emitShiftOperation(BB, IP, I.getOperand(0), I.getOperand(1), I.getOpcode() == Instruction::Shl, I.getType(), getReg(I)); } Basically all of the code for emitting shift instructions is i...

Hello, I'm having problems with the following LLVM instruction %tmp.0.i = call int (sbyte*, ...)* %printf( sbyte* getelementptr ([11 x sbyte]* %.str_1, long 0, ...... The first argument in function call, sbyte* getelementptr ([11 x sbyte]* %.str_1..... appears to be ConstantExpression*, and my backend does not support ConstantExpression yet. I probable can implement

...%tmp.0.i = call int (sbyte*, ...)* > > %printf(%tmp.1 , ......... > > While this is feasible and possible, I really wouldn't recommend it. Take > a look at how the X86 backend handles this stuff. For shift instructions, > for example, we have: > > void ISel::visitShiftInst(ShiftInst &I) { > MachineBasicBlock::iterator IP = BB->end(); > emitShiftOperation(BB, IP, I.getOperand(0), I.getOperand(1), > I.getOpcode() == Instruction::Shl, I.getType(), > getReg(I)); > } > > Basically all of the code fo...