search for: vishnubhotla

Hi! I want to know How to count the number of predecessors for each basic block? Thank You ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

...NAME:llvm.migrate_begin.i32 opt: Function.cpp:293: unsigned int llvm::Function::getIntrinsicID(bool) const: Assertion `noAssert && "Invalid LLVM intrinsic name"' failed. P.S: > --- Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> wrote: > On Feb 19, 2008, at 1:11 AM, aditya vishnubhotla > > wrote: > > Hi, > > I tried creating variable argument intrinsics > > which > > > are to be placeholders for some instructions which > > should not be executed by the backend. > > > > Kindly help me with the errors in my > >...

On Feb 19, 2008, at 1:11 AM, aditya vishnubhotla wrote: > Hi, > I tried creating variable argument intrinsics which > are to be placeholders for some instructions which > should not be executed by the backend. > > Kindly help me with the errors in my "migrate_begin" > intrinsic creation > > //Additions made...

...e more (depends upon the predecessors of bb2 and bb3). You can also try to utilize the branching info at the end of each basic block in llvmIR of the source. I am working on something similar, do let me know if u need some specific information. Regards Prabhat On Dec 20, 2007 11:36 AM, aditya vishnubhotla <vvaditya12 at yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi! > > I want to know > > How to count the number of predecessors for each basic > block? > > Thank You > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Never miss a...

...umber of arguments? if so, how? My other question is can we use the data type "void" to represent the datatype of the arguments instead of creating multiple intrinsic for each possible type of the dependencies? thank you aditya P.S: > > On Jan 9, 2008, at 2:12 AM, aditya vishnubhotla > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > I am writing a pass which identifies the > parts(basic > > blocks/functions) of > > the input algorithm with more of data flow or > control > > flow. These parts are to > > be separated executed by different...

Hello, LLVM's intrinsic overloading mechanism does not currently support overloading on pointer types. Patches to implement this would be welcome. Dan On May 7, 2008, at 9:25 AM, aditya vishnubhotla wrote: > Hi, > I tried creating intrinsics which are to be > placeholders for a set of instructions (actually a section of a > basic block) to be executed elsewhere(for e.g. in HW). > These intrinsics are to take care of the data dependencies of the > set of instructions bei...

Hi, I tried creating variable argument intrinsics which are to be placeholders for some instructions which should not be executed by the backend. Kindly help me with the errors in my "migrate_begin" intrinsic creation //Additions made to Intrinsics.td file: def llvm_migrate_begin : LLVMType<iAny>; def int_migrate_begin :

<table cellspacing='0' cellpadding='0' border='0' ><tr><td style='font: inherit;'>Hi,<br>I tried creating intrinsics which are to be<br>placeholders for a set of instructions (actually a section of a basic block) to be executed elsewhere(for e.g. in HW).<br>These intrinsics are to take care of the data dependencies of the set of

hi, how to get the number of immediate predecessors for each basic block (arguements of remarks statement at the beginning of the basic block) thank you aditya ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

Hi, I tried creating intrinsics which are to be placeholders for a set of instructions which should not be executed by the backend. In this process I want to replace the uses of each instruction with the intrinsic(Call) instruction. I am puzzled about the return type to be used in the intrinsic defintion(for creating the intrinsic) which is to be included in the Intrinsics.td file. Do we need

Hi, I have implemented intrinsics which are placeholders for instructions executed elsewhere (e.g. in HW). So i have two types of intrinsics migrate_begin and migrate_end. Now i would like to make these intrinsics known to the PowerPC backend. Since the hardware initialization can not be implemented by one instruction it has to be expanded to a library call or lowered to something the ppc

Hi, I am writing a pass which identifies the parts(basic blocks/functions) of the input algorithm with more of data flow or control flow. These parts are to be separated executed by different backends. My idea is to insert replacement basic blocks with intrinsic instructions within the basic block. These instructions should satisfy the data dependencies within the LLVM data structure and should

hi, how to get the number of immediate predecessors for each basic block of LLVM IR (arguements of remarks statement at the beginning of the basic block) thank you aditya ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

Hi, I am writing a pass which identifies the parts(basic blocks/functions) of the input algorithm with more of data flow or control flow. These parts are to be separated executed by different backends. My idea is to insert replacement basic blocks with intrinsic instructions within the basic block. These instructions should satisfy the data dependencies within the LLVM data structure and should

Hi, I tried creating intrinsics which are to be placeholders for some instructions which should not be executed by the backend. Kindly help me with the errors in my "migrate_begin" intrinsic creation The following are the additions made to the Intrinsics.td file def llvm_migrate_begin : LLVMType<iAny>; def int_migrate_begin : Intrinsic<[llvm_migrate_begin,llvm_vararg_ty],

Hi, I tried creating intrinsics which are to be placeholders for a set of instructions which should not be executed by the backend. I get the following verifier error. The "indvar.next4" instruction being mentioned in the step wise debug is not present in the LLVM IR (i.e IR before application of my transformation Pass). As seen below the operands of this instructions causing

Hi, I tried creating intrinsics which are to be placeholders for a set of instructions which should not be executed by the backend. I want to retain only intrinsic,phi and terminator instructions in a basic block. I have taken care of the external dependencies of basic block. How do I delete the rest of the instructions? Thank You Aditya P.S:

Hi, I tried creating intrinsics which are to be placeholders for a set of instructions which should not be executed by the backend. I want to retain only intrinsic,phi and terminator instructions in a basic block. I have taken care of the external dependencies of basic block. How do I delete the rest of the instructions? Thank You Aditya P.S: