search for: virtualqueri

Hi all, I''ve got the latest win32-mmap code checked into CVS. Unfortunately, it seems that I''m not able to open an existing mapping and retrieve set data. Below is a simple example that seems like it ought to work but doesn''t. Any ideas? # map1.rb require ''win32/mmap'' include Win32 mmap = MMap.new(:name => ''alpha'', :size

Hi Ruben, > I see I missed some curly braces. I also modified spacing a tiny bit. Doesn't seem so. E.g. you have: + if ( !VirtualQuery(addr, &b, sizeof(b)) ) + exit(1); + if( !VirtualProtect(b.BaseAddress, b.RegionSize, PAGE_EXECUTE_READWRITE, &b.Protect) ) Add space after "if". Do not put spaces after "(" and before ")". Same for other

Hi, Attached is a patch for compiler-rt to allow it to compile with MinGW-w64 on Windows. Results aren't that bad. x86 GCC and Clang do everything right, all tests pass. x86_64 GCC fails a lot of tests. This is 99% sure a codegen issue. 38 - fixunssfti_test (Failed) 74 - fixunsdfti_test (Failed) x86_64 Clang fails these tests: 2 - udivmodti4_test (SEGFAULT) 6 - fixdfti_test (Failed) 8 -

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> Date: 2012/1/7 Subject: Re: [llvm-commits] [PATCH][Compiler-rt] Windows implementation of mmap functionality in clear_cache_test and enable_execute_stack_test To: Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> 2012/1/7 Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> > Hello Ruben

2012/1/7 Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> > Hi Ruben, > > > I see I missed some curly braces. I also modified spacing a tiny bit. > Doesn't seem so. E.g. you have: > > + if ( !VirtualQuery(addr, &b, sizeof(b)) ) > + exit(1); > + if( !VirtualProtect(b.BaseAddress, b.RegionSize, > PAGE_EXECUTE_READWRITE, &b.Protect) ) >

Hi Pavel, Right, my app also crashes in a different place under winedbg, although it crashes in the same winedbg place under gdb. I took a closer look at wine --winver nt40 --debugmsg +all. I found something interesting. If I search for queue_exception, I find that there is an exception raised before the LoadOEMCall, about 328klines in: 0806d398:Call

2013/5/30 Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> > 2013/5/25 Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com> > >> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Ruben Van Boxem >> <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I submitted this patch a long while ago, together with a bunch of other >> > changes (some of which got

Hi, I've got a program that produces these error messages when started with wine. fixme:dc:LockWindowUpdate (0x10024), partial stub! fixme:dc:LockWindowUpdate ((nil)), partial stub! fixme:dc:LockWindowUpdate (0x10024), partial stub! fixme:dc:LockWindowUpdate ((nil)), partial stub! fixme:dc:LockWindowUpdate (0x10024), partial stub! fixme:dc:LockWindowUpdate ((nil)), partial stub! The program

Here is my thought process on why the application crashes with a protection violation reading a section of memory. I used IDA to disassemble the app. Here's the section where it reads from memory and crashes because of a protection violation: 00760D4A sub_760D4A proc near ; CODE XREF: sub_75FCB0+159^Xp 00760D4A push ebp 00760D4B mov