search for: virtual_mapped

...ernel/relocate_kernel_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/relocate_kernel_64.S index a7227dfe1a2b..0c0fc259a4e2 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/relocate_kernel_64.S +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/relocate_kernel_64.S @@ -208,11 +208,9 @@ identity_mapped: movq %rax, %cr3 lea PAGE_SIZE(%r8), %rsp call swap_pages - jmp *virtual_mapped_addr(%rip) - - /* Absolute value for PIE support */ -virtual_mapped_addr: - .quad virtual_mapped + movabsq $virtual_mapped, %rax + pushq %rax + ret virtual_mapped: movq RSP(%r8), %rsp -- 2.16.2.660.g709887971b-goog

First I'd like to thank all the developers and contributors to dovecot. I've been using it for many years, and deeply appreciate your fine work. :) dovecot --version 2.2.22 (fe789d2) I have a working installation with postfix and dovecot, and I want to add sieve to it, so I am trying to configure postfix to use lmtp instead of 'virtual' for its delivery service. However it is

Hello, What would be the best way to implement "deliver mail to multiple maildirs" through LMTP in Dovecot? Like in Postfix virtual_maps. Thank you! Best wishes, Janis

I considered sending to the postfix list instead, and would be happy to do that if it's more appropriate. In regards to your suggestion, I've tried local_transport and mailbox_transport, but both result in mail bouncing because "User doesn't exist." I've added my virtual_maps file to local_recipient_maps, and that still doesn't work. I did get the expected

Hi, i send a email to my server but i get Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 554 554 5.7.1 <postmaster at mercadeoeficaz-cr.com>: Relay access denied

Hello Doug, First off since this is a postfix configuration problem I beleive it would be better suited in the postfix mailing list. The way I understand it is that you are editing the virtual transport map when you should be changing the local transport map because you are delivering to a normal, system user, not a virtual user. Try and see if that works for you. ? -- Yassine. On

I'm a total newbie with Dovecot LDA and LDAP. To be honoust, I don't know what I'm doing. My system runs CentOS 5.5, Postfix 2.3.3 and Dovecot 1.2.11. I try to set up Dovecot LDA. But whatever I'm trying, I fail. 2010-06-30T18:28:12.585128+02:00 h1690641 postfix/pipe[26443]: 84F012A00A55: to=<test at domain.com>, relay=dovecot, delay=0.07, delays=0.03/0.01/0/0.02,

Hi I have been able to setup postfix and dovecot using postgres as the backend store with virtual user maps on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Server. I have been following instructions from here: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/DovecotPostgresql I haven't setup postfix to use saslauthd and PAM, instead I am using dovecot for SASL authentication. Rest of the table structures and query files are the same as

This probably is a postfix problem, but I think there are lots of postfix experts/users on this list, and have heard a lot good things about this list, so I am just giving it a try. Thanks in advance! I am using dovecot-1.0.0-8_56.src.rpm downloaded from atrpms.net, and rebuilt from it(rpmrebuild ...). Postfix is 2.4.3. I followed documents at http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA and LDA/Postfix, and

Changes: - patch v2: - Adapt patch to work post KPTI and compiler changes - Redo all performance testing with latest configs and compilers - Simplify mov macro on PIE (MOVABS now) - Reduce GOT footprint - patch v1: - Simplify ftrace implementation. - Use gcc mstack-protector-guard-reg=%gs with PIE when possible. - rfc v3: - Use --emit-relocs instead of -pie to reduce

Changes: - patch v2: - Adapt patch to work post KPTI and compiler changes - Redo all performance testing with latest configs and compilers - Simplify mov macro on PIE (MOVABS now) - Reduce GOT footprint - patch v1: - Simplify ftrace implementation. - Use gcc mstack-protector-guard-reg=%gs with PIE when possible. - rfc v3: - Use --emit-relocs instead of -pie to reduce

Hi, I come back with my problem: On debian lenny, using dovecot 1.1.13-2~bpo50+1 I try to configure my setup (with Postfix virtual domains) to use dovecot as lda but nothing happens, as if postfix not delegate to dovecot I am using the contreol panel alternc (http://www.alternc.org). All the maildir are in the format /var/alternc/mail/i/info_domainepublic.net for info at domainepublic.net The

Changes: - patch v3: - Update on message to describe longer term PIE goal. - Minor change on ftrace if condition. - Changed code using xchgq. - patch v2: - Adapt patch to work post KPTI and compiler changes - Redo all performance testing with latest configs and compilers - Simplify mov macro on PIE (MOVABS now) - Reduce GOT footprint - patch v1: - Simplify ftrace

hey friends, I am trying to make postfix run with tls in chroot mode, but I am not able to send the messages with tls on. I am using postfix 2.2.10 on centos 4.0 and I had compiled the postfix from sources with tls & cyrus-sasl support. I copied the certificates from /usr/share/ssl to /etc/postfix. Below are the errors I am getting: May 25 13:27:51 test1 postfix/smtpd[4095]: warning: TLS

HI, > You could set > > syslog_facility = local5 > > and have all the log messages in the messages file. According to the output of command # doveadm log find every type of message goes to the file I was looking at, "/var/spool/maillog". >> So, is it postfix doing the local mail delivery, not dovecot? >> > To answer this question please post relevant

These patches make the changes necessary to build the kernel as Position Independent Executable (PIE) on x86_64. A PIE kernel can be relocated below the top 2G of the virtual address space. It allows to optionally extend the KASLR randomization range from 1G to 3G. Thanks a lot to Ard Biesheuvel & Kees Cook on their feedback on compiler changes, PIE support and KASLR in general. Thanks to

These patches make the changes necessary to build the kernel as Position Independent Executable (PIE) on x86_64. A PIE kernel can be relocated below the top 2G of the virtual address space. It allows to optionally extend the KASLR randomization range from 1G to 3G. Thanks a lot to Ard Biesheuvel & Kees Cook on their feedback on compiler changes, PIE support and KASLR in general. Thanks to

Changes: - patch v1: - Simplify ftrace implementation. - Use gcc mstack-protector-guard-reg=%gs with PIE when possible. - rfc v3: - Use --emit-relocs instead of -pie to reduce dynamic relocation space on mapped memory. It also simplifies the relocation process. - Move the start the module section next to the kernel. Remove the need for -mcmodel=large on modules. Extends

Changes: - patch v1: - Simplify ftrace implementation. - Use gcc mstack-protector-guard-reg=%gs with PIE when possible. - rfc v3: - Use --emit-relocs instead of -pie to reduce dynamic relocation space on mapped memory. It also simplifies the relocation process. - Move the start the module section next to the kernel. Remove the need for -mcmodel=large on modules. Extends

All, Thank you for having this list, and I have a question regarding why postfix is not handing off delivery to Dovecot to virtual users. Here is all I can offer since I am not at my server: *Here is the debug information for my postfix setup:* [code] Mar 13 20:23:55 andromeda postfix/smtpd[15316]: name_mask: ipv4 Mar 13 20:23:55 andromeda postfix/smtpd[15316]: inet_addr_local: configured 2