search for: virtuailization

Guys currently I am horrified by the ease at which I can find bugs in the pending paravirtualization patches. I have barely even looked at arch/i386 in the -mm tree and it feels like I am tripping over significant bugs left and right. Because no one has heeded my advice and put in a proper platform layer on arch/i386 and we are instead doing a half baked job with paravirt_ops it is still

Guys currently I am horrified by the ease at which I can find bugs in the pending paravirtualization patches. I have barely even looked at arch/i386 in the -mm tree and it feels like I am tripping over significant bugs left and right. Because no one has heeded my advice and put in a proper platform layer on arch/i386 and we are instead doing a half baked job with paravirt_ops it is still

Hello ! i am new to this list and asterisk. I run asterisk 1.4 on a OpenSuSE 11.4. My SIP Provider needs my IP to connect the local area number to my IP and also for there firewall. I plan to run asterisk in a pacemaker cluster that is not the problem and works. My problem is the virtual IP from the cluster and the connection to the SIP Provider. My Server has 2 NIC's one intern to

Hi, If your cluster's virtual IP is using ip aliasing (eg eth0:0), i think your problem come from UDP flows, they are, in opposition to TCP flows, unconnected, so the IP stack take the shortest route/interface to send them, wich is when this is the default route, the real interface and not the aliased. For exemple if you have eth0 the real, eth0:0 the virtual, you can try to add in your