search for: virtio_transport_more_repli

...vsock_pkt, list); - list_del_init(&pkt->list); - - virtio_transport_recv_pkt(pkt); - } -out: - mutex_unlock(&vsock->rx_lock); -} - static int virtio_transport_send_pkt_loopback(struct virtio_vsock *vsock, struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt) { @@ -370,59 +343,6 @@ static bool virtio_transport_more_replies(struct virtio_vsock *vsock) return val < virtqueue_get_vring_size(vq); } -static void virtio_transport_rx_work(struct work_struct *work) -{ - struct virtio_vsock *vsock = - container_of(work, struct virtio_vsock, rx_work); - struct virtqueue *vq; - - vq = vsock->vqs[VSOCK_VQ_RX]; - -...

...rg_rxbuf[VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_MRG_BUF_NUM]; }; struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info { diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c index 2040a9e..3557ad3 100644 --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c @@ -359,11 +359,62 @@ static bool virtio_transport_more_replies(struct virtio_vsock *vsock) return val < virtqueue_get_vring_size(vq); } +static struct virtio_vsock_pkt *receive_mergeable(struct virtqueue *vq, + struct virtio_vsock *vsock, unsigned int *total_len) +{ + struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt; + u16 num_buf; + void *page; + unsigned int len; + in...

...rg_rxbuf[VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_MRG_BUF_NUM]; }; struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info { diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c index 2040a9e..3557ad3 100644 --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c @@ -359,11 +359,62 @@ static bool virtio_transport_more_replies(struct virtio_vsock *vsock) return val < virtqueue_get_vring_size(vq); } +static struct virtio_vsock_pkt *receive_mergeable(struct virtqueue *vq, + struct virtio_vsock *vsock, unsigned int *total_len) +{ + struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt; + u16 num_buf; + void *page; + unsigned int len; + in...

...patch. > > struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info { > diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c > index 2040a9e..3557ad3 100644 > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c > @@ -359,11 +359,62 @@ static bool virtio_transport_more_replies(struct virtio_vsock *vsock) > return val < virtqueue_get_vring_size(vq); > } > > +static struct virtio_vsock_pkt *receive_mergeable(struct virtqueue *vq, > + struct virtio_vsock *vsock, unsigned int *total_len) > +{ > + struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt; > + u16 num_bu...

...p;hdr, &pkt->hdr, sizeof(pkt->hdr)); sgs[0] = &hdr; - sg_init_one(&buf, pkt->buf, buf_len); + sg_init_one(&buf, pkt->vec[0].iov_base, buf_len); sgs[1] = &buf; ret = virtqueue_add_sgs(vq, sgs, 0, 2, pkt, GFP_KERNEL); if (ret) @@ -388,11 +395,78 @@ static bool virtio_transport_more_replies(struct virtio_vsock *vsock) return val < virtqueue_get_vring_size(vq); } +static struct virtio_vsock_pkt *receive_mergeable(struct virtqueue *vq, + struct virtio_vsock *vsock, unsigned int *total_len) +{ + struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt; + u16 num_buf; + void *buf; + unsigned int len; + siz...

...p;hdr, &pkt->hdr, sizeof(pkt->hdr)); sgs[0] = &hdr; - sg_init_one(&buf, pkt->buf, buf_len); + sg_init_one(&buf, pkt->vec[0].iov_base, buf_len); sgs[1] = &buf; ret = virtqueue_add_sgs(vq, sgs, 0, 2, pkt, GFP_KERNEL); if (ret) @@ -388,11 +395,78 @@ static bool virtio_transport_more_replies(struct virtio_vsock *vsock) return val < virtqueue_get_vring_size(vq); } +static struct virtio_vsock_pkt *receive_mergeable(struct virtqueue *vq, + struct virtio_vsock *vsock, unsigned int *total_len) +{ + struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt; + u16 num_buf; + void *buf; + unsigned int len; + siz...

...;hdr; >> >> - sg_init_one(&buf, pkt->buf, buf_len); >> + sg_init_one(&buf, pkt->vec[0].iov_base, buf_len); >> sgs[1] = &buf; >> ret = virtqueue_add_sgs(vq, sgs, 0, 2, pkt, GFP_KERNEL); >> if (ret) >> @@ -388,11 +395,78 @@ static bool virtio_transport_more_replies(struct virtio_vsock *vsock) >> return val < virtqueue_get_vring_size(vq); >> } >> >> +static struct virtio_vsock_pkt *receive_mergeable(struct virtqueue *vq, >> + struct virtio_vsock *vsock, unsigned int *total_len) >> +{ >> + struct virtio_vsock_p...

...;hdr; >> >> - sg_init_one(&buf, pkt->buf, buf_len); >> + sg_init_one(&buf, pkt->vec[0].iov_base, buf_len); >> sgs[1] = &buf; >> ret = virtqueue_add_sgs(vq, sgs, 0, 2, pkt, GFP_KERNEL); >> if (ret) >> @@ -388,11 +395,78 @@ static bool virtio_transport_more_replies(struct virtio_vsock *vsock) >> return val < virtqueue_get_vring_size(vq); >> } >> >> +static struct virtio_vsock_pkt *receive_mergeable(struct virtqueue *vq, >> + struct virtio_vsock *vsock, unsigned int *total_len) >> +{ >> + struct virtio_vsock_p...

...struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info { >> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c >> index 2040a9e..3557ad3 100644 >> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c >> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c >> @@ -359,11 +359,62 @@ static bool virtio_transport_more_replies(struct virtio_vsock *vsock) >> return val < virtqueue_get_vring_size(vq); >> } >> >> +static struct virtio_vsock_pkt *receive_mergeable(struct virtqueue *vq, >> + struct virtio_vsock *vsock, unsigned int *total_len) >> +{ >> + struct...

...struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info { >> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c >> index 2040a9e..3557ad3 100644 >> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c >> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c >> @@ -359,11 +359,62 @@ static bool virtio_transport_more_replies(struct virtio_vsock *vsock) >> return val < virtqueue_get_vring_size(vq); >> } >> >> +static struct virtio_vsock_pkt *receive_mergeable(struct virtqueue *vq, >> + struct virtio_vsock *vsock, unsigned int *total_len) >> +{ >> + struct...

...hdr)); > sgs[0] = &hdr; > > - sg_init_one(&buf, pkt->buf, buf_len); > + sg_init_one(&buf, pkt->vec[0].iov_base, buf_len); > sgs[1] = &buf; > ret = virtqueue_add_sgs(vq, sgs, 0, 2, pkt, GFP_KERNEL); > if (ret) > @@ -388,11 +395,78 @@ static bool virtio_transport_more_replies(struct virtio_vsock *vsock) > return val < virtqueue_get_vring_size(vq); > } > > +static struct virtio_vsock_pkt *receive_mergeable(struct virtqueue *vq, > + struct virtio_vsock *vsock, unsigned int *total_len) > +{ > + struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt; > + u16 num_buf...

...sg_init_one(&buf, pkt->buf, buf_len); > >> + sg_init_one(&buf, pkt->vec[0].iov_base, buf_len); > >> sgs[1] = &buf; > >> ret = virtqueue_add_sgs(vq, sgs, 0, 2, pkt, GFP_KERNEL); > >> if (ret) > >> @@ -388,11 +395,78 @@ static bool virtio_transport_more_replies(struct virtio_vsock *vsock) > >> return val < virtqueue_get_vring_size(vq); > >> } > >> > >> +static struct virtio_vsock_pkt *receive_mergeable(struct virtqueue *vq, > >> + struct virtio_vsock *vsock, unsigned int *total_len) > >> +{ &g...

Most of the patches are reviewed by Dexuan, Stefan, and Jorgen. The following patches need reviews: - [11/15] vsock: add multi-transports support - [12/15] vsock/vmci: register vmci_transport only when VMCI guest/host are active - [15/15] vhost/vsock: refuse CID assigned to the guest->host transport RFC: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1168442/ v1:

Hi all, this series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use vsock with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using

Hi all, this series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use vsock with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using

This series is based on v4.7. This RFC is the implementation for the new VIRTIO Socket device. It is developed in parallel with the VIRTIO device specification and proves the design. Once the specification has been accepted I will send a non-RFC version of this patch series. v6: * Add VHOST_VSOCK_SET_RUNNING ioctl to start/stop vhost cleanly * Add graceful shutdown to avoid port reuse while

This series is based on v4.7. This RFC is the implementation for the new VIRTIO Socket device. It is developed in parallel with the VIRTIO device specification and proves the design. Once the specification has been accepted I will send a non-RFC version of this patch series. v6: * Add VHOST_VSOCK_SET_RUNNING ioctl to start/stop vhost cleanly * Add graceful shutdown to avoid port reuse while

This series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use VSOCK with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using VMware

This series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use VSOCK with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using VMware