Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20 matches for "virtio_pci_common_q_msix".
2014 Dec 30
0
[PATCH RFC v2 6/7] virtio_pci: macros for PCI layout offsets.
...IRTIO_PCI_COMMON_GFSELECT 8
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_GF 12
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_MSIX 16
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_NUMQ 18
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_STATUS 20
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_CFGGENERATION 21
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_SELECT 22
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_SIZE 24
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_MSIX 26
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_ENABLE 28
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_NOFF 30
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_DESCLO 32
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_DESCHI 36
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_AVAILLO 40
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_AVAILHI 44
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_USEDLO 48
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COM...
2014 Dec 30
0
[PATCH RFC v2 6/7] virtio_pci: macros for PCI layout offsets.
...IRTIO_PCI_COMMON_GFSELECT 8
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_GF 12
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_MSIX 16
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_NUMQ 18
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_STATUS 20
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_CFGGENERATION 21
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_SELECT 22
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_SIZE 24
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_MSIX 26
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_ENABLE 28
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_NOFF 30
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_DESCLO 32
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_DESCHI 36
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_AVAILLO 40
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_AVAILHI 44
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_USEDLO 48
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COM...
2019 Sep 11
1
[RFC PATCH 3/4] virtio: introudce a mdev based transport
...; And can't we use a couple of registers for this, and avoid ioctls?
> > >
> > > Yes, how about something like interrupt numbers for each virtqueue and
> > > config?
> > Should we just reuse VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_XXX then?
>
>
> You mean something like VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_MSIX? Then it becomes a PCI
> transport in fact. And using either MSIX or irq number is actually another
> layer of indirection. So I think we can just write callback function and
> parameter through registers.
I just realized, all these registers are just encoded so you
can pass stuff through...
2019 Sep 10
2
[RFC PATCH 3/4] virtio: introudce a mdev based transport
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 09:13:02PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On 2019/9/10 ??6:01, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > +#ifndef _LINUX_VIRTIO_MDEV_H
> > > +#define _LINUX_VIRTIO_MDEV_H
> > > +
> > > +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > > +#include <linux/vringh.h>
> > > +#include <uapi/linux/virtio_net.h>
> > > +
2019 Sep 10
2
[RFC PATCH 3/4] virtio: introudce a mdev based transport
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 09:13:02PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On 2019/9/10 ??6:01, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > +#ifndef _LINUX_VIRTIO_MDEV_H
> > > +#define _LINUX_VIRTIO_MDEV_H
> > > +
> > > +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > > +#include <linux/vringh.h>
> > > +#include <uapi/linux/virtio_net.h>
> > > +
2019 Sep 11
0
[RFC PATCH 3/4] virtio: introudce a mdev based transport
...casting).
>>
>>
>>> And can't we use a couple of registers for this, and avoid ioctls?
>>
>> Yes, how about something like interrupt numbers for each virtqueue and
>> config?
> Should we just reuse VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_XXX then?
You mean something like VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_MSIX? Then it becomes a PCI
transport in fact. And using either MSIX or irq number is actually
another layer of indirection. So I think we can just write callback
function and parameter through registers.
>
>
>>>> +
>>>> +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_DEVICE_API_STRING "vi...
2013 May 30
5
[PATCH RFC] virtio-pci: new config layout: using memory BAR
Anthony Liguori <aliguori at us.ibm.com> writes:
> Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> writes:
>
>> Anthony Liguori <aliguori at us.ibm.com> writes:
>>> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> writes:
>>>> + case offsetof(struct virtio_pci_common_cfg, device_feature_select):
>>>> + return
2013 May 30
5
[PATCH RFC] virtio-pci: new config layout: using memory BAR
Anthony Liguori <aliguori at us.ibm.com> writes:
> Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> writes:
>
>> Anthony Liguori <aliguori at us.ibm.com> writes:
>>> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> writes:
>>>> + case offsetof(struct virtio_pci_common_cfg, device_feature_select):
>>>> + return
2014 Dec 11
6
[PATCH RFC 0/5] virtio_pci: modern driver
Based on Rusty's patches.
Coding style and funny jokes are his.
Bugs and a star wars reference (should be easy to spot) are mine.
Untested, but useful as basis for beginning the qemu work.
TODO:
= simplify probing: use a common probe function, probe with modern driver
first, if that fails - probe with legacy driver.
BUGS: ATM legacy driver can win and drive a transitional device
2014 Dec 11
6
[PATCH RFC 0/5] virtio_pci: modern driver
Based on Rusty's patches.
Coding style and funny jokes are his.
Bugs and a star wars reference (should be easy to spot) are mine.
Untested, but useful as basis for beginning the qemu work.
TODO:
= simplify probing: use a common probe function, probe with modern driver
first, if that fails - probe with legacy driver.
BUGS: ATM legacy driver can win and drive a transitional device
2014 Dec 15
6
[PATCH RFC 0/5] virtio pci: virtio 1.0 support
This is on top of 3.19 master + my bugfix patches, and adds virtio 1.0 support
to virtio pci.
This is 3.20 material I think.
Would like to get feedback on s390 change as it's untested.
Michael S Tsirkin (2):
pci: add pci_iomap_range
s390: add pci_iomap_range
Michael S. Tsirkin (2):
virtio_pci: modern driver
virtio_pci: macros for PCI layout offsets.
Rusty Russell (1):
virtio-pci:
2014 Dec 15
6
[PATCH RFC 0/5] virtio pci: virtio 1.0 support
This is on top of 3.19 master + my bugfix patches, and adds virtio 1.0 support
to virtio pci.
This is 3.20 material I think.
Would like to get feedback on s390 change as it's untested.
Michael S Tsirkin (2):
pci: add pci_iomap_range
s390: add pci_iomap_range
Michael S. Tsirkin (2):
virtio_pci: modern driver
virtio_pci: macros for PCI layout offsets.
Rusty Russell (1):
virtio-pci:
2015 Nov 18
2
[RFC] kvmtool: add support for modern virtio-pci
...IRTIO_PCI_COMMON_GFSELECT 8
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_GF 12
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_MSIX 16
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_NUMQ 18
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_STATUS 20
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_CFGGENERATION 21
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_SELECT 22
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_SIZE 24
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_MSIX 26
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_ENABLE 28
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_NOFF 30
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_DESCLO 32
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_DESCHI 36
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_AVAILLO 40
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_AVAILHI 44
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_USEDLO 48
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COM...
2015 Nov 18
2
[RFC] kvmtool: add support for modern virtio-pci
...IRTIO_PCI_COMMON_GFSELECT 8
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_GF 12
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_MSIX 16
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_NUMQ 18
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_STATUS 20
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_CFGGENERATION 21
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_SELECT 22
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_SIZE 24
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_MSIX 26
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_ENABLE 28
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_NOFF 30
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_DESCLO 32
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_DESCHI 36
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_AVAILLO 40
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_AVAILHI 44
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_USEDLO 48
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COM...
2015 Jan 21
9
[PATCH post-squash 0/9] virtio 1.0: virtio-pci fixup
This is just repost of all patches with fixups squashed in - convenient
if you just want to remove old ones from queue and apply new ones.
I also tweaked commit log for patch
"virtio_pci: modern driver"
I also included Gerd's tag:
Tested-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com>
You can find it all before the rebase -i --autosquash in my tree:
2015 Jan 21
9
[PATCH post-squash 0/9] virtio 1.0: virtio-pci fixup
This is just repost of all patches with fixups squashed in - convenient
if you just want to remove old ones from queue and apply new ones.
I also tweaked commit log for patch
"virtio_pci: modern driver"
I also included Gerd's tag:
Tested-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com>
You can find it all before the rebase -i --autosquash in my tree:
2015 Jan 21
14
[PATCH pre-squash 00/14] virtio 1.0: virtio-pci fixup
This is just the full patchset reposted with fixups in correct order,
before squashing them.
I also tweaked commit log for patch
"virtio_pci: modern driver"
I also included Gerd's tag:
Tested-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com>
You can find it all before the rebase -i --autosquash in my tree:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git virtio-next
2015 Jan 21
14
[PATCH pre-squash 00/14] virtio 1.0: virtio-pci fixup
This is just the full patchset reposted with fixups in correct order,
before squashing them.
I also tweaked commit log for patch
"virtio_pci: modern driver"
I also included Gerd's tag:
Tested-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com>
You can find it all before the rebase -i --autosquash in my tree:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git virtio-next
2015 Jan 14
22
[PATCH v3 00/16] virtio-pci: towards virtio 1.0 guest support
Changes since v2:
handling for devices without config space (e.g. rng)
reduce # of mappings for VQs
These patches seem to work fine on my virtio-1.0 qemu branch.
There haven't been any bugs since v2: just minor cleanups
and enhancements.
QEMU side is still undergoing polishing, but is already testable.
Rusty, what do you think? Let's merge these for 3.20?
Also - will you be doing that
2015 Jan 14
22
[PATCH v3 00/16] virtio-pci: towards virtio 1.0 guest support
Changes since v2:
handling for devices without config space (e.g. rng)
reduce # of mappings for VQs
These patches seem to work fine on my virtio-1.0 qemu branch.
There haven't been any bugs since v2: just minor cleanups
and enhancements.
QEMU side is still undergoing polishing, but is already testable.
Rusty, what do you think? Let's merge these for 3.20?
Also - will you be doing that