Displaying 20 results from an estimated 22 matches for "virtio_pci_common_q_enable".
2014 Dec 30
0
[PATCH RFC v2 6/7] virtio_pci: macros for PCI layout offsets.
...VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_GF 12
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_MSIX 16
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_NUMQ 18
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_STATUS 20
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_CFGGENERATION 21
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_SELECT 22
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_SIZE 24
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_MSIX 26
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_ENABLE 28
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_NOFF 30
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_DESCLO 32
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_DESCHI 36
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_AVAILLO 40
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_AVAILHI 44
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_USEDLO 48
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_USEDHI 52
+
#endif /* VIRTIO_PCI...
2014 Dec 30
0
[PATCH RFC v2 6/7] virtio_pci: macros for PCI layout offsets.
...VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_GF 12
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_MSIX 16
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_NUMQ 18
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_STATUS 20
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_CFGGENERATION 21
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_SELECT 22
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_SIZE 24
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_MSIX 26
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_ENABLE 28
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_NOFF 30
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_DESCLO 32
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_DESCHI 36
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_AVAILLO 40
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_AVAILHI 44
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_USEDLO 48
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_USEDHI 52
+
#endif /* VIRTIO_PCI...
2019 Sep 10
2
[RFC PATCH 3/4] virtio: introudce a mdev based transport
...> > > +/* Ready bit for the currently selected queue - Read Write */
> > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_QUEUE_READY 0x044
> > Is this same as started?
>
>
> Do you mean "status"?
I really meant "enabled", didn't remember the correct name.
As in: VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_ENABLE
>
> >
> > > +
> > > +/* Alignment of virtqueue - Read Only */
> > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_QUEUE_ALIGN 0x048
> > > +
> > > +/* Queue notifier - Write Only */
> > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_QUEUE_NOTIFY 0x050
> > > +
> > >...
2019 Sep 10
2
[RFC PATCH 3/4] virtio: introudce a mdev based transport
...> > > +/* Ready bit for the currently selected queue - Read Write */
> > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_QUEUE_READY 0x044
> > Is this same as started?
>
>
> Do you mean "status"?
I really meant "enabled", didn't remember the correct name.
As in: VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_ENABLE
>
> >
> > > +
> > > +/* Alignment of virtqueue - Read Only */
> > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_QUEUE_ALIGN 0x048
> > > +
> > > +/* Queue notifier - Write Only */
> > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_QUEUE_NOTIFY 0x050
> > > +
> > >...
2019 Sep 11
0
[RFC PATCH 3/4] virtio: introudce a mdev based transport
...+/* Ready bit for the currently selected queue - Read Write */
>>>> +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_QUEUE_READY 0x044
>>> Is this same as started?
>>
>> Do you mean "status"?
> I really meant "enabled", didn't remember the correct name.
> As in: VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_ENABLE
Yes, it's the same.
Thanks
>
>>>> +
>>>> +/* Alignment of virtqueue - Read Only */
>>>> +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_QUEUE_ALIGN 0x048
>>>> +
>>>> +/* Queue notifier - Write Only */
>>>> +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_QUEUE_NOTIFY 0...
2013 May 30
5
[PATCH RFC] virtio-pci: new config layout: using memory BAR
Anthony Liguori <aliguori at us.ibm.com> writes:
> Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> writes:
>
>> Anthony Liguori <aliguori at us.ibm.com> writes:
>>> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> writes:
>>>> + case offsetof(struct virtio_pci_common_cfg, device_feature_select):
>>>> + return
2013 May 30
5
[PATCH RFC] virtio-pci: new config layout: using memory BAR
Anthony Liguori <aliguori at us.ibm.com> writes:
> Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> writes:
>
>> Anthony Liguori <aliguori at us.ibm.com> writes:
>>> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> writes:
>>>> + case offsetof(struct virtio_pci_common_cfg, device_feature_select):
>>>> + return
2019 Sep 11
1
[RFC PATCH 3/4] virtio: introudce a mdev based transport
...ed queue - Read Write */
> > > > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_QUEUE_READY 0x044
> > > > Is this same as started?
> > >
> > > Do you mean "status"?
> > I really meant "enabled", didn't remember the correct name.
> > As in: VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_ENABLE
>
>
> Yes, it's the same.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> >
> > > > > +
> > > > > +/* Alignment of virtqueue - Read Only */
> > > > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_QUEUE_ALIGN 0x048
> > > > > +
> > > > > +/* Qu...
2014 Dec 11
6
[PATCH RFC 0/5] virtio_pci: modern driver
Based on Rusty's patches.
Coding style and funny jokes are his.
Bugs and a star wars reference (should be easy to spot) are mine.
Untested, but useful as basis for beginning the qemu work.
TODO:
= simplify probing: use a common probe function, probe with modern driver
first, if that fails - probe with legacy driver.
BUGS: ATM legacy driver can win and drive a transitional device
2014 Dec 11
6
[PATCH RFC 0/5] virtio_pci: modern driver
Based on Rusty's patches.
Coding style and funny jokes are his.
Bugs and a star wars reference (should be easy to spot) are mine.
Untested, but useful as basis for beginning the qemu work.
TODO:
= simplify probing: use a common probe function, probe with modern driver
first, if that fails - probe with legacy driver.
BUGS: ATM legacy driver can win and drive a transitional device
2014 Dec 15
6
[PATCH RFC 0/5] virtio pci: virtio 1.0 support
This is on top of 3.19 master + my bugfix patches, and adds virtio 1.0 support
to virtio pci.
This is 3.20 material I think.
Would like to get feedback on s390 change as it's untested.
Michael S Tsirkin (2):
pci: add pci_iomap_range
s390: add pci_iomap_range
Michael S. Tsirkin (2):
virtio_pci: modern driver
virtio_pci: macros for PCI layout offsets.
Rusty Russell (1):
virtio-pci:
2014 Dec 15
6
[PATCH RFC 0/5] virtio pci: virtio 1.0 support
This is on top of 3.19 master + my bugfix patches, and adds virtio 1.0 support
to virtio pci.
This is 3.20 material I think.
Would like to get feedback on s390 change as it's untested.
Michael S Tsirkin (2):
pci: add pci_iomap_range
s390: add pci_iomap_range
Michael S. Tsirkin (2):
virtio_pci: modern driver
virtio_pci: macros for PCI layout offsets.
Rusty Russell (1):
virtio-pci:
2015 Nov 18
2
[RFC] kvmtool: add support for modern virtio-pci
...VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_GF 12
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_MSIX 16
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_NUMQ 18
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_STATUS 20
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_CFGGENERATION 21
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_SELECT 22
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_SIZE 24
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_MSIX 26
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_ENABLE 28
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_NOFF 30
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_DESCLO 32
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_DESCHI 36
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_AVAILLO 40
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_AVAILHI 44
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_USEDLO 48
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_USEDHI 52
+
+#endif /* VIRTIO_PCI...
2015 Nov 18
2
[RFC] kvmtool: add support for modern virtio-pci
...VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_GF 12
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_MSIX 16
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_NUMQ 18
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_STATUS 20
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_CFGGENERATION 21
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_SELECT 22
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_SIZE 24
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_MSIX 26
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_ENABLE 28
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_NOFF 30
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_DESCLO 32
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_DESCHI 36
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_AVAILLO 40
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_AVAILHI 44
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_USEDLO 48
+#define VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_USEDHI 52
+
+#endif /* VIRTIO_PCI...
2015 Jan 21
9
[PATCH post-squash 0/9] virtio 1.0: virtio-pci fixup
This is just repost of all patches with fixups squashed in - convenient
if you just want to remove old ones from queue and apply new ones.
I also tweaked commit log for patch
"virtio_pci: modern driver"
I also included Gerd's tag:
Tested-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com>
You can find it all before the rebase -i --autosquash in my tree:
2015 Jan 21
9
[PATCH post-squash 0/9] virtio 1.0: virtio-pci fixup
This is just repost of all patches with fixups squashed in - convenient
if you just want to remove old ones from queue and apply new ones.
I also tweaked commit log for patch
"virtio_pci: modern driver"
I also included Gerd's tag:
Tested-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com>
You can find it all before the rebase -i --autosquash in my tree:
2015 Jan 21
14
[PATCH pre-squash 00/14] virtio 1.0: virtio-pci fixup
This is just the full patchset reposted with fixups in correct order,
before squashing them.
I also tweaked commit log for patch
"virtio_pci: modern driver"
I also included Gerd's tag:
Tested-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com>
You can find it all before the rebase -i --autosquash in my tree:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git virtio-next
2015 Jan 21
14
[PATCH pre-squash 00/14] virtio 1.0: virtio-pci fixup
This is just the full patchset reposted with fixups in correct order,
before squashing them.
I also tweaked commit log for patch
"virtio_pci: modern driver"
I also included Gerd's tag:
Tested-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com>
You can find it all before the rebase -i --autosquash in my tree:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git virtio-next
2019 Sep 10
2
[RFC PATCH 3/4] virtio: introudce a mdev based transport
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 04:19:34PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> This path introduces a new mdev transport for virtio. This is used to
> use kernel virtio driver to drive the mediated device that is capable
> of populating virtqueue directly.
>
> A new virtio-mdev driver will be registered to the mdev bus, when a
> new virtio-mdev device is probed, it will register the device with
2019 Sep 10
2
[RFC PATCH 3/4] virtio: introudce a mdev based transport
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 04:19:34PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> This path introduces a new mdev transport for virtio. This is used to
> use kernel virtio driver to drive the mediated device that is capable
> of populating virtqueue directly.
>
> A new virtio-mdev driver will be registered to the mdev bus, when a
> new virtio-mdev device is probed, it will register the device with