Displaying 14 results from an estimated 14 matches for "virtio_net_netdev".
2018 Apr 10
2
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...ooks like this.
>
> netvsc_netdev
> /
> /
> VF_slave
>
>With virtio_net, 3 netdev model
>
> bypass_netdev
> / \
> / \
>VF_slave virtio_net netdev
Could you also mark the original netdev which is there now? is it
bypass_netdev or virtio_net_netdev ?
2018 Apr 10
2
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...ooks like this.
>
> netvsc_netdev
> /
> /
> VF_slave
>
>With virtio_net, 3 netdev model
>
> bypass_netdev
> / \
> / \
>VF_slave virtio_net netdev
Could you also mark the original netdev which is there now? is it
bypass_netdev or virtio_net_netdev ?
2018 Apr 10
3
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...; >
>> > With virtio_net, 3 netdev model
>> >
>> > bypass_netdev
>> > / \
>> > / \
>> > VF_slave virtio_net netdev
>> Could you also mark the original netdev which is there now? is it
>> bypass_netdev or virtio_net_netdev ?
>
> bypass_netdev
> / \
> / \
>VF_slave virtio_net netdev (original)
That does not make sense.
1) You diverge from the behaviour of the netvsc, where the original
netdev is a master of the VF
2) If the original netdev is a slave, you cannot have any IP addres...
2018 Apr 10
3
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...; >
>> > With virtio_net, 3 netdev model
>> >
>> > bypass_netdev
>> > / \
>> > / \
>> > VF_slave virtio_net netdev
>> Could you also mark the original netdev which is there now? is it
>> bypass_netdev or virtio_net_netdev ?
>
> bypass_netdev
> / \
> / \
>VF_slave virtio_net netdev (original)
That does not make sense.
1) You diverge from the behaviour of the netvsc, where the original
netdev is a master of the VF
2) If the original netdev is a slave, you cannot have any IP addres...
2018 Apr 11
2
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...>
>> > > > bypass_netdev
>> > > > / \
>> > > > / \
>> > > > VF_slave virtio_net netdev
>> > > Could you also mark the original netdev which is there now? is it
>> > > bypass_netdev or virtio_net_netdev ?
>> > bypass_netdev
>> > / \
>> > / \
>> > VF_slave virtio_net netdev (original)
>> That does not make sense.
>> 1) You diverge from the behaviour of the netvsc, where the original
>> netdev is a master of the VF
>&g...
2018 Apr 11
2
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...>
>> > > > bypass_netdev
>> > > > / \
>> > > > / \
>> > > > VF_slave virtio_net netdev
>> > > Could you also mark the original netdev which is there now? is it
>> > > bypass_netdev or virtio_net_netdev ?
>> > bypass_netdev
>> > / \
>> > / \
>> > VF_slave virtio_net netdev (original)
>> That does not make sense.
>> 1) You diverge from the behaviour of the netvsc, where the original
>> netdev is a master of the VF
>&g...
2018 Apr 11
2
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...gt; > > > > > / \
>> > > > > > / \
>> > > > > > VF_slave virtio_net netdev
>> > > > > Could you also mark the original netdev which is there now? is it
>> > > > > bypass_netdev or virtio_net_netdev ?
>> > > > bypass_netdev
>> > > > / \
>> > > > / \
>> > > > VF_slave virtio_net netdev (original)
>> > > That does not make sense.
>> > > 1) You diverge from the behaviour of the netvsc, where...
2018 Apr 11
2
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...gt; > > > > > / \
>> > > > > > / \
>> > > > > > VF_slave virtio_net netdev
>> > > > > Could you also mark the original netdev which is there now? is it
>> > > > > bypass_netdev or virtio_net_netdev ?
>> > > > bypass_netdev
>> > > > / \
>> > > > / \
>> > > > VF_slave virtio_net netdev (original)
>> > > That does not make sense.
>> > > 1) You diverge from the behaviour of the netvsc, where...
2018 Apr 10
0
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
.../
>> /
>> VF_slave
>>
>> With virtio_net, 3 netdev model
>>
>> bypass_netdev
>> / \
>> / \
>> VF_slave virtio_net netdev
> Could you also mark the original netdev which is there now? is it
> bypass_netdev or virtio_net_netdev ?
bypass_netdev
/ \
/ \
VF_slave virtio_net netdev (original)
2018 Apr 10
0
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...h virtio_net, 3 netdev model
>>>>
>>>> bypass_netdev
>>>> / \
>>>> / \
>>>> VF_slave virtio_net netdev
>>> Could you also mark the original netdev which is there now? is it
>>> bypass_netdev or virtio_net_netdev ?
>> bypass_netdev
>> / \
>> / \
>> VF_slave virtio_net netdev (original)
> That does not make sense.
> 1) You diverge from the behaviour of the netvsc, where the original
> netdev is a master of the VF
> 2) If the original netdev is a sl...
2018 Apr 11
0
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...gt;>>>> bypass_netdev
>>>>>> / \
>>>>>> / \
>>>>>> VF_slave virtio_net netdev
>>>>> Could you also mark the original netdev which is there now? is it
>>>>> bypass_netdev or virtio_net_netdev ?
>>>> bypass_netdev
>>>> / \
>>>> / \
>>>> VF_slave virtio_net netdev (original)
>>> That does not make sense.
>>> 1) You diverge from the behaviour of the netvsc, where the original
>>> netdev i...
2018 Apr 11
0
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...gt; > / \
> >> > > > > > / \
> >> > > > > > VF_slave virtio_net netdev
> >> > > > > Could you also mark the original netdev which is there now? is it
> >> > > > > bypass_netdev or virtio_net_netdev ?
> >> > > > bypass_netdev
> >> > > > / \
> >> > > > / \
> >> > > > VF_slave virtio_net netdev (original)
> >> > > That does not make sense.
> >> > > 1) You diverge from the...
2018 Apr 10
2
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 08:47:06PM CEST, sridhar.samudrala at intel.com wrote:
>On 4/9/2018 1:07 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Sat, Apr 07, 2018 at 12:59:14AM CEST, sridhar.samudrala at intel.com wrote:
>> > On 4/6/2018 5:48 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> > > Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 11:08:22PM CEST, sridhar.samudrala at intel.com wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> > > >
2018 Apr 10
2
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 08:47:06PM CEST, sridhar.samudrala at intel.com wrote:
>On 4/9/2018 1:07 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Sat, Apr 07, 2018 at 12:59:14AM CEST, sridhar.samudrala at intel.com wrote:
>> > On 4/6/2018 5:48 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> > > Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 11:08:22PM CEST, sridhar.samudrala at intel.com wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> > > >