search for: virtio_net_netdev

Displaying 14 results from an estimated 14 matches for "virtio_net_netdev".

2018 Apr 10
2
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...> > netvsc_netdev > / > / > VF_slave > >With virtio_net, 3 netdev model > > bypass_netdev > / \ > / \ >VF_slave virtio_net netdev Could you also mark the original netdev which is there now? is it bypass_netdev or virtio_net_netdev ?
2018 Apr 10
2
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...> > netvsc_netdev > / > / > VF_slave > >With virtio_net, 3 netdev model > > bypass_netdev > / \ > / \ >VF_slave virtio_net netdev Could you also mark the original netdev which is there now? is it bypass_netdev or virtio_net_netdev ?
2018 Apr 10
3
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...>> > With virtio_net, 3 netdev model >> > >> > bypass_netdev >> > / \ >> > / \ >> > VF_slave virtio_net netdev >> Could you also mark the original netdev which is there now? is it >> bypass_netdev or virtio_net_netdev ? > > bypass_netdev > / \ > / \ >VF_slave virtio_net netdev (original) That does not make sense. 1) You diverge from the behaviour of the netvsc, where the original netdev is a master of the VF 2) If the original netdev is a slave, you cannot have any I...
2018 Apr 10
3
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...>> > With virtio_net, 3 netdev model >> > >> > bypass_netdev >> > / \ >> > / \ >> > VF_slave virtio_net netdev >> Could you also mark the original netdev which is there now? is it >> bypass_netdev or virtio_net_netdev ? > > bypass_netdev > / \ > / \ >VF_slave virtio_net netdev (original) That does not make sense. 1) You diverge from the behaviour of the netvsc, where the original netdev is a master of the VF 2) If the original netdev is a slave, you cannot have any I...
2018 Apr 11
2
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...t;> > > > bypass_netdev >> > > > / \ >> > > > / \ >> > > > VF_slave virtio_net netdev >> > > Could you also mark the original netdev which is there now? is it >> > > bypass_netdev or virtio_net_netdev ? >> > bypass_netdev >> > / \ >> > / \ >> > VF_slave virtio_net netdev (original) >> That does not make sense. >> 1) You diverge from the behaviour of the netvsc, where the original >> netdev is a master of the V...
2018 Apr 11
2
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...t;> > > > bypass_netdev >> > > > / \ >> > > > / \ >> > > > VF_slave virtio_net netdev >> > > Could you also mark the original netdev which is there now? is it >> > > bypass_netdev or virtio_net_netdev ? >> > bypass_netdev >> > / \ >> > / \ >> > VF_slave virtio_net netdev (original) >> That does not make sense. >> 1) You diverge from the behaviour of the netvsc, where the original >> netdev is a master of the V...
2018 Apr 11
2
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...> > > > / \ >> > > > > > / \ >> > > > > > VF_slave virtio_net netdev >> > > > > Could you also mark the original netdev which is there now? is it >> > > > > bypass_netdev or virtio_net_netdev ? >> > > > bypass_netdev >> > > > / \ >> > > > / \ >> > > > VF_slave virtio_net netdev (original) >> > > That does not make sense. >> > > 1) You diverge from the behaviour of the netvs...
2018 Apr 11
2
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...> > > > / \ >> > > > > > / \ >> > > > > > VF_slave virtio_net netdev >> > > > > Could you also mark the original netdev which is there now? is it >> > > > > bypass_netdev or virtio_net_netdev ? >> > > > bypass_netdev >> > > > / \ >> > > > / \ >> > > > VF_slave virtio_net netdev (original) >> > > That does not make sense. >> > > 1) You diverge from the behaviour of the netvs...
2018 Apr 10
0
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
.../ >> VF_slave >> >> With virtio_net, 3 netdev model >> >> bypass_netdev >> / \ >> / \ >> VF_slave virtio_net netdev > Could you also mark the original netdev which is there now? is it > bypass_netdev or virtio_net_netdev ? bypass_netdev / \ / \ VF_slave virtio_net netdev (original)
2018 Apr 10
0
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
..._net, 3 netdev model >>>> >>>> bypass_netdev >>>> / \ >>>> / \ >>>> VF_slave virtio_net netdev >>> Could you also mark the original netdev which is there now? is it >>> bypass_netdev or virtio_net_netdev ? >> bypass_netdev >> / \ >> / \ >> VF_slave virtio_net netdev (original) > That does not make sense. > 1) You diverge from the behaviour of the netvsc, where the original > netdev is a master of the VF > 2) If the original netdev...
2018 Apr 11
0
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...gt;>> bypass_netdev >>>>>> / \ >>>>>> / \ >>>>>> VF_slave virtio_net netdev >>>>> Could you also mark the original netdev which is there now? is it >>>>> bypass_netdev or virtio_net_netdev ? >>>> bypass_netdev >>>> / \ >>>> / \ >>>> VF_slave virtio_net netdev (original) >>> That does not make sense. >>> 1) You diverge from the behaviour of the netvsc, where the original >>>...
2018 Apr 11
0
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
.../ \ > >> > > > > > / \ > >> > > > > > VF_slave virtio_net netdev > >> > > > > Could you also mark the original netdev which is there now? is it > >> > > > > bypass_netdev or virtio_net_netdev ? > >> > > > bypass_netdev > >> > > > / \ > >> > > > / \ > >> > > > VF_slave virtio_net netdev (original) > >> > > That does not make sense. > >> > > 1) You diverge f...
2018 Apr 10
2
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 08:47:06PM CEST, sridhar.samudrala at intel.com wrote: >On 4/9/2018 1:07 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> Sat, Apr 07, 2018 at 12:59:14AM CEST, sridhar.samudrala at intel.com wrote: >> > On 4/6/2018 5:48 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> > > Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 11:08:22PM CEST, sridhar.samudrala at intel.com wrote: >> [...] >>
2018 Apr 10
2
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 08:47:06PM CEST, sridhar.samudrala at intel.com wrote: >On 4/9/2018 1:07 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> Sat, Apr 07, 2018 at 12:59:14AM CEST, sridhar.samudrala at intel.com wrote: >> > On 4/6/2018 5:48 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> > > Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 11:08:22PM CEST, sridhar.samudrala at intel.com wrote: >> [...] >>