Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "virtio_legacy_set_featur".
Did you mean:
virtio_legacy_set_features
2015 Jan 07
2
[PATCH RFC v6 13/20] virtio: allow to fail setting status
...ces, as they will never see FEATURES_OK, right?
> So
> we need to make this depending on revisions (or whatever the equivalent
> is for pci/mmio), as we cannot check for VERSION_1. Not sure whether
> this makes the code easier to follow.
So let's make this a separate callback then.
virtio_legacy_set_features?
2015 Jan 07
2
[PATCH RFC v6 13/20] virtio: allow to fail setting status
...ces, as they will never see FEATURES_OK, right?
> So
> we need to make this depending on revisions (or whatever the equivalent
> is for pci/mmio), as we cannot check for VERSION_1. Not sure whether
> this makes the code easier to follow.
So let's make this a separate callback then.
virtio_legacy_set_features?
2015 Jan 08
0
[PATCH RFC v6 13/20] virtio: allow to fail setting status
...S_OK, right?
> > So
> > we need to make this depending on revisions (or whatever the equivalent
> > is for pci/mmio), as we cannot check for VERSION_1. Not sure whether
> > this makes the code easier to follow.
>
> So let's make this a separate callback then.
> virtio_legacy_set_features?
I'm not sure I like that. We'd need to touch every transport, right?
2015 Jan 08
0
[PATCH RFC v6 13/20] virtio: allow to fail setting status
...S_OK, right?
> > So
> > we need to make this depending on revisions (or whatever the equivalent
> > is for pci/mmio), as we cannot check for VERSION_1. Not sure whether
> > this makes the code easier to follow.
>
> So let's make this a separate callback then.
> virtio_legacy_set_features?
I'm not sure I like that. We'd need to touch every transport, right?
2014 Dec 30
2
[PATCH RFC v6 13/20] virtio: allow to fail setting status
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 02:25:15PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> virtio-1 allow setting of the FEATURES_OK status bit to fail if
> the negotiated feature bits are inconsistent: let's fail
> virtio_set_status() in that case and update virtio-ccw to post an
> error to the guest.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck at de.ibm.com>
Right but a separate
2014 Dec 30
2
[PATCH RFC v6 13/20] virtio: allow to fail setting status
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 02:25:15PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> virtio-1 allow setting of the FEATURES_OK status bit to fail if
> the negotiated feature bits are inconsistent: let's fail
> virtio_set_status() in that case and update virtio-ccw to post an
> error to the guest.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck at de.ibm.com>
Right but a separate