Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "virtio_fs_restor".
Did you mean:
virtio_fs_restore
2019 Nov 11
0
[PATCH] virtiofs: Use static const, not const static
...gt; ---
> fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
> index b77acea..2ac6818 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
> @@ -684,12 +684,12 @@ static int virtio_fs_restore(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
>
> -const static struct virtio_device_id id_table[] = {
> +static const struct virtio_device_id id_table[] = {
> { VIRTIO_ID_FS, VIRTIO_DEV_ANY_ID },
> {},
> };
>
> -const static unsigned int fea...
2019 Nov 11
1
[PATCH -next] virtiofs: Fix old-style declaration
...YueHaibing <yuehaibing at huawei.com>
---
fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
index b77acea..2ac6818 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
@@ -684,12 +684,12 @@ static int virtio_fs_restore(struct virtio_device *vdev)
}
#endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
-const static struct virtio_device_id id_table[] = {
+static const struct virtio_device_id id_table[] = {
{ VIRTIO_ID_FS, VIRTIO_DEV_ANY_ID },
{},
};
-const static unsigned int feature_table[] = {};
+static const unsigned int fe...
2019 Nov 12
0
[PATCH v2] virtiofs: Use static const, not const static
...comment
> fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
> index b77acea..2ac6818 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
> @@ -684,12 +684,12 @@ static int virtio_fs_restore(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
>
> -const static struct virtio_device_id id_table[] = {
> +static const struct virtio_device_id id_table[] = {
> { VIRTIO_ID_FS, VIRTIO_DEV_ANY_ID },
> {},
> };
>
> -const static unsigned int fea...
2019 Sep 05
0
[PATCH v4 15/16] virtio-fs: add virtiofs filesystem
...ification queue so that host can send notifications to
guest. Will get rid of this comment for now.
[..]
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> > +static int virtio_fs_freeze(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > +{
> > + return 0; /* TODO */
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int virtio_fs_restore(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > +{
> > + return 0; /* TODO */
> > +}
>
> Is this really a good idea? I'd rather it was implemented,
> but if not possible at all disabling PM seems better than just
> keep going.
I agree. Will look into disabling it.
>
> &...
2019 Sep 06
1
[PATCH v4 15/16] virtio-fs: add virtiofs filesystem
...s to
> guest. Will get rid of this comment for now.
>
> [..]
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> > > +static int virtio_fs_freeze(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > > +{
> > > + return 0; /* TODO */
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int virtio_fs_restore(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > > +{
> > > + return 0; /* TODO */
> > > +}
> >
> > Is this really a good idea? I'd rather it was implemented,
> > but if not possible at all disabling PM seems better than just
> > keep going.
>
> I agre...
2019 Sep 03
4
[PATCH v4 15/16] virtio-fs: add virtiofs filesystem
..._fs_mutex);
> + list_del(&fs->list);
> + mutex_unlock(&virtio_fs_mutex);
> +
> + vdev->priv = NULL;
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> +static int virtio_fs_freeze(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> +{
> + return 0; /* TODO */
> +}
> +
> +static int virtio_fs_restore(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> +{
> + return 0; /* TODO */
> +}
Is this really a good idea? I'd rather it was implemented,
but if not possible at all disabling PM seems better than just
keep going.
> +#endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
> +
> +const static struct virtio_device_id i...
2019 Sep 03
4
[PATCH v4 15/16] virtio-fs: add virtiofs filesystem
..._fs_mutex);
> + list_del(&fs->list);
> + mutex_unlock(&virtio_fs_mutex);
> +
> + vdev->priv = NULL;
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> +static int virtio_fs_freeze(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> +{
> + return 0; /* TODO */
> +}
> +
> +static int virtio_fs_restore(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> +{
> + return 0; /* TODO */
> +}
Is this really a good idea? I'd rather it was implemented,
but if not possible at all disabling PM seems better than just
keep going.
> +#endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
> +
> +const static struct virtio_device_id i...
2019 Sep 18
0
[PATCH v6] virtio-fs: add virtiofs filesystem
...s_mutex);
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> +static int virtio_fs_freeze(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> +{
> + /* TODO need to save state here */
> + pr_warn("virtio-fs: suspend/resume not yet supported\n");
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}
> +
> +static int virtio_fs_restore(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> +{
> + /* TODO need to restore state here */
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
> +
> +const static struct virtio_device_id id_table[] = {
> + { VIRTIO_ID_FS, VIRTIO_DEV_ANY_ID },
> + {},
> +};
> +
> +const static u...