Displaying 20 results from an estimated 29 matches for "virtio_f_in_ord".
Did you mean:
virtio_f_in_order
2018 Nov 23
5
[PATCH net-next 0/3] basic in order support for vhost_net
Hi:
This series implement basic in order feature support for
vhost_net. This feature requires both driver and device to use
descriptors in order which can simplify the implementation and
optimizaton for both side. The series also implement a simple
optimization that avoid read available ring. Test shows 10%
performance improvement.
More optimizations could be done on top.
Jason Wang (3):
2018 May 10
2
[PATCH v1] virtio: support VIRTIO_F_IO_BARRIER
...> In 1.0 it says:
>
> 24 to 32
> Feature bits reserved for extensions to the queue and feature negotiation mechanisms
>
> This information is out-of-date.
>
No. In the latest spec draft, it's 24 to 33. And it
becomes out-of-date since VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED(34)
and VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER(35) were introduced. Do you
want me to update it in the IO_BARRIER patch or do
you want me to update it in a new patch?
Best regards,
Tiwei Bie
2018 May 10
2
[PATCH v1] virtio: support VIRTIO_F_IO_BARRIER
...> In 1.0 it says:
>
> 24 to 32
> Feature bits reserved for extensions to the queue and feature negotiation mechanisms
>
> This information is out-of-date.
>
No. In the latest spec draft, it's 24 to 33. And it
becomes out-of-date since VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED(34)
and VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER(35) were introduced. Do you
want me to update it in the IO_BARRIER patch or do
you want me to update it in a new patch?
Best regards,
Tiwei Bie
2018 Nov 23
1
[PATCH net-next 3/3] vhost: don't touch avail ring if in_order is negotiated
...81a66d34..c8be151bc897 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> @@ -2002,6 +2002,7 @@ int vhost_get_vq_desc(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> __virtio16 avail_idx;
> __virtio16 ring_head;
> int ret, access;
> + bool in_order = vhost_has_feature(vq, VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER);
>
> /* Check it isn't doing very strange things with descriptor numbers. */
> last_avail_idx = vq->last_avail_idx;
> @@ -2034,15 +2035,19 @@ int vhost_get_vq_desc(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
>
> /* Grab the next descriptor number they're advertising, and i...
2018 Nov 23
0
[PATCH net-next 2/3] vhost_net: support in order feature
.../vhost/net.c
@@ -74,7 +74,8 @@ enum {
VHOST_NET_FEATURES = VHOST_FEATURES |
(1ULL << VHOST_NET_F_VIRTIO_NET_HDR) |
(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF) |
- (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM)
+ (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM) |
+ (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER)
};
enum {
@@ -971,7 +972,8 @@ static void handle_tx(struct vhost_net *net)
vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, vq);
vhost_net_disable_vq(net, vq);
- if (vhost_sock_zcopy(sock))
+ if (vhost_sock_zcopy(sock) &&
+ !vhost_has_feature(vq, VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER))
handle_tx_zero...
2018 Nov 23
1
[PATCH net-next 2/3] vhost_net: support in order feature
...enum {
> VHOST_NET_FEATURES = VHOST_FEATURES |
> (1ULL << VHOST_NET_F_VIRTIO_NET_HDR) |
> (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF) |
> - (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM)
> + (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM) |
> + (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER)
> };
>
> enum {
> @@ -971,7 +972,8 @@ static void handle_tx(struct vhost_net *net)
> vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, vq);
> vhost_net_disable_vq(net, vq);
>
> - if (vhost_sock_zcopy(sock))
> + if (vhost_sock_zcopy(sock) &&
> + !vhost_has...
2018 Feb 27
3
[PATCH RFC 1/2] virtio: introduce packed ring defines
...port for the packed virtqueue layout. */
>+#define VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED 34
Spec says VIRTIO_F_PACKED_RING not RING_PACKED
>+
>+/*
>+ * This feature indicates that all buffers are used by the device
>+ * in the same order in which they have been made available.
>+ */
>+#define VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER 35
>+
>+/*
>+ * This feature indicates that drivers pass extra data (besides
>+ * identifying the Virtqueue) in their device notifications.
>+ */
>+#define VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA 36
>+
> #endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_VIRTIO_CONFIG_H */
>diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virt...
2018 May 10
0
[virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v1] virtio: support VIRTIO_F_IO_BARRIER
...32
> > Feature bits reserved for extensions to the queue and feature negotiation mechanisms
> >
> > This information is out-of-date.
> >
>
> No. In the latest spec draft, it's 24 to 33. And it
> becomes out-of-date since VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED(34)
> and VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER(35) were introduced. Do you
> want me to update it in the IO_BARRIER patch or do
> you want me to update it in a new patch?
Please update it to 37 in the IO_BARRIER patch.
Stefan
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: applic...
2018 Nov 23
0
[PATCH net-next 3/3] vhost: don't touch avail ring if in_order is negotiated
...b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
index 3a5f81a66d34..c8be151bc897 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
@@ -2002,6 +2002,7 @@ int vhost_get_vq_desc(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
__virtio16 avail_idx;
__virtio16 ring_head;
int ret, access;
+ bool in_order = vhost_has_feature(vq, VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER);
/* Check it isn't doing very strange things with descriptor numbers. */
last_avail_idx = vq->last_avail_idx;
@@ -2034,15 +2035,19 @@ int vhost_get_vq_desc(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
/* Grab the next descriptor number they're advertising, and increment
* the index we'...
2018 Feb 23
0
[PATCH RFC 1/2] virtio: introduce packed ring defines
....
*/
#define VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM 33
+
+/* This feature indicates support for the packed virtqueue layout. */
+#define VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED 34
+
+/*
+ * This feature indicates that all buffers are used by the device
+ * in the same order in which they have been made available.
+ */
+#define VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER 35
+
+/*
+ * This feature indicates that drivers pass extra data (besides
+ * identifying the Virtqueue) in their device notifications.
+ */
+#define VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA 36
+
#endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_VIRTIO_CONFIG_H */
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h b/include/uapi/linux/virti...
2018 May 04
2
[PATCH v1] virtio: support VIRTIO_F_IO_BARRIER
This patch introduces the support for VIRTIO_F_IO_BARRIER.
When this feature is negotiated, driver will use the barriers
suitable for hardware devices.
Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie at intel.com>
---
This patch depends on below proposal for virtio-spec:
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-dev/201805/msg00019.html
This patch also depends on below patch:
2018 May 03
6
[RFC] virtio: support VIRTIO_F_IO_BARRIER
This patch introduces the support for VIRTIO_F_IO_BARRIER.
When this feature is negotiated, driver will use the barriers
suitable for hardware devices.
Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie at intel.com>
---
drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 5 +++++
include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h | 8 +++++++-
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
2018 May 03
6
[RFC] virtio: support VIRTIO_F_IO_BARRIER
This patch introduces the support for VIRTIO_F_IO_BARRIER.
When this feature is negotiated, driver will use the barriers
suitable for hardware devices.
Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie at intel.com>
---
drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 5 +++++
include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h | 8 +++++++-
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
2018 Feb 14
6
[PATCH RFC 0/2] Packed ring for vhost
Hi all:
This RFC implement a subset of packed ring which was described at
https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-docs/blob/master/virtio-v1.1-packed-wd07.pdf
. The code were tested with pmd implement by Jens at
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-January/089417.html. Minor
change was needed for pmd codes to kick virtqueue since it assumes a
busy polling backend.
Test were done between localhost
2018 Feb 14
6
[PATCH RFC 0/2] Packed ring for vhost
Hi all:
This RFC implement a subset of packed ring which was described at
https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-docs/blob/master/virtio-v1.1-packed-wd07.pdf
. The code were tested with pmd implement by Jens at
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-January/089417.html. Minor
change was needed for pmd codes to kick virtqueue since it assumes a
busy polling backend.
Test were done between localhost
2018 Feb 23
5
[PATCH RFC 0/2] Packed ring for virtio
Hello everyone,
This RFC implements a subset of packed ring which is described at
https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-docs/blob/master/virtio-v1.1-packed-wd08.pdf
The code was tested with DPDK vhost (testpmd/vhost-PMD) implemented
by Jens at http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-January/089417.html
Minor changes are needed for the vhost code, e.g. to kick the guest.
It's not a complete
2018 Apr 10
0
[RFC v2] virtio: support packed ring
...gt; +
> +/* This feature indicates support for the packed virtqueue layout. */
> +#define VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED 34
> +
> +/*
> + * This feature indicates that all buffers are used by the device
> + * in the same order in which they have been made available.
> + */
> +#define VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER 35
> +
> #endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_VIRTIO_CONFIG_H */
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h
> index 6d5d5faa989b..735d4207c988 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h
> @@ -44,6 +44,9...
2018 Apr 13
0
[RFC v2] virtio: support packed ring
...gt; +
> +/* This feature indicates support for the packed virtqueue layout. */
> +#define VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED 34
> +
> +/*
> + * This feature indicates that all buffers are used by the device
> + * in the same order in which they have been made available.
> + */
> +#define VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER 35
> +
> #endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_VIRTIO_CONFIG_H */
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h
> index 6d5d5faa989b..735d4207c988 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h
> @@ -44,6 +44,9...
2018 Apr 01
8
[RFC v2] virtio: support packed ring
....
*/
#define VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM 33
+
+/* This feature indicates support for the packed virtqueue layout. */
+#define VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED 34
+
+/*
+ * This feature indicates that all buffers are used by the device
+ * in the same order in which they have been made available.
+ */
+#define VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER 35
+
#endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_VIRTIO_CONFIG_H */
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h
index 6d5d5faa989b..735d4207c988 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h
@@ -44,6 +44,9 @@
/* This means the buffer contai...
2018 Apr 01
8
[RFC v2] virtio: support packed ring
....
*/
#define VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM 33
+
+/* This feature indicates support for the packed virtqueue layout. */
+#define VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED 34
+
+/*
+ * This feature indicates that all buffers are used by the device
+ * in the same order in which they have been made available.
+ */
+#define VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER 35
+
#endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_VIRTIO_CONFIG_H */
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h
index 6d5d5faa989b..735d4207c988 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h
@@ -44,6 +44,9 @@
/* This means the buffer contai...