Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "virtio_f_".
Did you mean:
virtio_fs
2018 Jul 04
1
[PATCH net-next 6/8] virtio: introduce packed ring defines
...les changed, 34 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h
> index 449132c..947f6a3 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h
> @@ -75,6 +75,8 @@
> */
> #define VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM 33
>
> +#define VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED 34
It's better to add some comments for this macro.
> +
> /*
> * Does the device support Single Root I/O Virtualization?
> */
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h
>...
2018 Jul 03
12
[PATCH net-next 0/8] Packed virtqueue for vhost
Hi all:
This series implements packed virtqueues. The code were tested with
Tiwei's RFC V6 at https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/5/120.
Pktgen test for both RX and TX does not show obvious difference with
split virtqueues. The main bottleneck is the guest Linux driver, since
it can not stress vhost for a 100% CPU utilization. A full TCP
benchmark is ongoing. Will test virtio-net pmd as well when
2018 Jul 03
12
[PATCH net-next 0/8] Packed virtqueue for vhost
Hi all:
This series implements packed virtqueues. The code were tested with
Tiwei's RFC V6 at https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/5/120.
Pktgen test for both RX and TX does not show obvious difference with
split virtqueues. The main bottleneck is the guest Linux driver, since
it can not stress vhost for a 100% CPU utilization. A full TCP
benchmark is ongoing. Will test virtio-net pmd as well when