search for: virtio_f_

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "virtio_f_".

Did you mean: virtio_fs
2018 Jul 04
1
[PATCH net-next 6/8] virtio: introduce packed ring defines
...les changed, 34 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h > index 449132c..947f6a3 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h > @@ -75,6 +75,8 @@ > */ > #define VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM 33 > > +#define VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED 34 It's better to add some comments for this macro. > + > /* > * Does the device support Single Root I/O Virtualization? > */ > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h &gt...
2018 Jul 03
12
[PATCH net-next 0/8] Packed virtqueue for vhost
Hi all: This series implements packed virtqueues. The code were tested with Tiwei's RFC V6 at https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/5/120. Pktgen test for both RX and TX does not show obvious difference with split virtqueues. The main bottleneck is the guest Linux driver, since it can not stress vhost for a 100% CPU utilization. A full TCP benchmark is ongoing. Will test virtio-net pmd as well when
2018 Jul 03
12
[PATCH net-next 0/8] Packed virtqueue for vhost
Hi all: This series implements packed virtqueues. The code were tested with Tiwei's RFC V6 at https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/5/120. Pktgen test for both RX and TX does not show obvious difference with split virtqueues. The main bottleneck is the guest Linux driver, since it can not stress vhost for a 100% CPU utilization. A full TCP benchmark is ongoing. Will test virtio-net pmd as well when