Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1106 matches for "virtio_drivers".
Did you mean:
virtio_driver
2012 Dec 05
12
[PATCH 1/3] virtio: change to_vp_device to an inlined definition
to_vp_device is worth changing to inlined definition.
Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong at cn.fujitsu.com>
---
drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c | 6 +-----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c
index e3ecc94..7681fe3 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c
@@ -98,11 +98,7 @@
2012 Dec 05
12
[PATCH 1/3] virtio: change to_vp_device to an inlined definition
to_vp_device is worth changing to inlined definition.
Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong at cn.fujitsu.com>
---
drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c | 6 +-----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c
index e3ecc94..7681fe3 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c
@@ -98,11 +98,7 @@
2013 Nov 20
9
[PATCH RFC 0/3] virtio: add new notify() callback to virtio_driver
Hi,
when an active virtio block device is hot-unplugged from a KVM guest, running
affected guest user applications are not aware of any errors that occur due
to the lost device. This patch-set adds code to avoid further request queueing
when a lost block device is detected, resulting in appropriate error info.
On System z there exists no handshake mechanism between host and guest
when a device
2013 Nov 20
9
[PATCH RFC 0/3] virtio: add new notify() callback to virtio_driver
Hi,
when an active virtio block device is hot-unplugged from a KVM guest, running
affected guest user applications are not aware of any errors that occur due
to the lost device. This patch-set adds code to avoid further request queueing
when a lost block device is detected, resulting in appropriate error info.
On System z there exists no handshake mechanism between host and guest
when a device
2014 Sep 22
1
[PATCH] virtio: unify config_changed handling
Replace duplicated code in all transports with a single wrapper in
virtio.c.
The only functional change is in virtio_mmio.c: if a buggy device sends
us an interrupt before driver is set, we previously returned IRQ_NONE,
now we return IRQ_HANDLED.
As this must not happen in practice, this does not look like a big deal.
See also commit 3fff0179e33cd7d0a688dab65700c46ad089e934
virtio-pci: do not
2014 Sep 22
1
[PATCH] virtio: unify config_changed handling
Replace duplicated code in all transports with a single wrapper in
virtio.c.
The only functional change is in virtio_mmio.c: if a buggy device sends
us an interrupt before driver is set, we previously returned IRQ_NONE,
now we return IRQ_HANDLED.
As this must not happen in practice, this does not look like a big deal.
See also commit 3fff0179e33cd7d0a688dab65700c46ad089e934
virtio-pci: do not
2013 Nov 21
5
[PATCH v2 RFC 0/3] virtio: add new notify() callback to virtio_driver
Hi, here is an updated patch-set with changes as suggested by Michael Tsirkin.
When an active virtio block device is hot-unplugged from a KVM guest, running
affected guest user applications are not aware of any errors that occur due
to the lost device. This patch-set adds code to avoid further request queueing
when a lost block device is detected, resulting in appropriate error info.
On System z
2013 Nov 21
5
[PATCH v2 RFC 0/3] virtio: add new notify() callback to virtio_driver
Hi, here is an updated patch-set with changes as suggested by Michael Tsirkin.
When an active virtio block device is hot-unplugged from a KVM guest, running
affected guest user applications are not aware of any errors that occur due
to the lost device. This patch-set adds code to avoid further request queueing
when a lost block device is detected, resulting in appropriate error info.
On System z
2013 Nov 21
2
[PATCH RFC 0/3] virtio: add new notify() callback to virtio_driver
On 21/11/13 07:47, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 04:22:00PM +0100, Heinz Graalfs wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> when an active virtio block device is hot-unplugged from a KVM guest, running
>> affected guest user applications are not aware of any errors that occur due
>> to the lost device. This patch-set adds code to avoid further request queueing
2013 Nov 21
2
[PATCH RFC 0/3] virtio: add new notify() callback to virtio_driver
On 21/11/13 07:47, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 04:22:00PM +0100, Heinz Graalfs wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> when an active virtio block device is hot-unplugged from a KVM guest, running
>> affected guest user applications are not aware of any errors that occur due
>> to the lost device. This patch-set adds code to avoid further request queueing
2013 Nov 20
0
[PATCH RFC 1/3] virtio: add notify() callback to virtio_driver
Add an optional notify() callback to virtio_driver. A backend
driver can provide this callback to perform actions for a lost
device.
notify() event values are inherited from virtio_ccw's notify()
callback. We might want to support even more of them lateron.
notify() return values are defined in include/linux/notifier.h.
Signed-off-by: Heinz Graalfs <graalfs at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
2013 Nov 21
0
[PATCH RFC 0/3] virtio: add new notify() callback to virtio_driver
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 04:22:00PM +0100, Heinz Graalfs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when an active virtio block device is hot-unplugged from a KVM guest, running
> affected guest user applications are not aware of any errors that occur due
> to the lost device. This patch-set adds code to avoid further request queueing
> when a lost block device is detected, resulting in appropriate error
2013 Nov 21
0
[PATCH v2 RFC 1/3] virtio: add notify() callback to virtio_driver
Add an optional notify() callback to virtio_driver. A backend
driver can provide this callback to perform actions for a lost
device.
notify() event values are inherited from virtio_ccw's notify()
callback. We might want to support even more of them lateron.
notify() return values are defined in include/linux/notifier.h.
Signed-off-by: Heinz Graalfs <graalfs at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
2014 Oct 05
0
[PATCH 02/16] virtio: unify config_changed handling
Replace duplicated code in all transports with a single wrapper in
virtio.c.
The only functional change is in virtio_mmio.c: if a buggy device sends
us an interrupt before driver is set, we previously returned IRQ_NONE,
now we return IRQ_HANDLED.
As this must not happen in practice, this does not look like a big deal.
See also commit 3fff0179e33cd7d0a688dab65700c46ad089e934
virtio-pci: do not
2013 Nov 21
0
[PATCH RFC 0/3] virtio: add new notify() callback to virtio_driver
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 03:43:51PM +0100, Heinz Graalfs wrote:
> On 21/11/13 07:47, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 04:22:00PM +0100, Heinz Graalfs wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>when an active virtio block device is hot-unplugged from a KVM guest, running
> >>affected guest user applications are not aware of any errors that occur due
>
2007 Sep 20
3
[PATCH 0/6] virtio with config abstraction and ring implementation
Hi all,
This patch series attempts to come closer to unifying kvm and lguest's
usage of virtio. As these two are the first implementations we've seen,
I hope making them closer will make future ones closer too.
Drivers now unpack their own configuration: their probe() methods are
uniform. The configuration mechanism is extensible and can be backed by
PCI, a string of bytes, or
2007 Sep 20
3
[PATCH 0/6] virtio with config abstraction and ring implementation
Hi all,
This patch series attempts to come closer to unifying kvm and lguest's
usage of virtio. As these two are the first implementations we've seen,
I hope making them closer will make future ones closer too.
Drivers now unpack their own configuration: their probe() methods are
uniform. The configuration mechanism is extensible and can be backed by
PCI, a string of bytes, or
2014 Oct 06
0
[PATCH v2 02/15] virtio: unify config_changed handling
Replace duplicated code in all transports with a single wrapper in
virtio.c.
The only functional change is in virtio_mmio.c: if a buggy device sends
us an interrupt before driver is set, we previously returned IRQ_NONE,
now we return IRQ_HANDLED.
As this must not happen in practice, this does not look like a big deal.
See also commit 3fff0179e33cd7d0a688dab65700c46ad089e934
virtio-pci: do not
2013 Nov 20
0
[PATCH RFC 2/3] virtio_blk: add virtblk_notify() as virtio_driver's notify() callback
Add virtblk_notify() as virtio_driver's notify() callback.
When a transport driver is notified that a device disappeared it
should invoke this callback to prevent further request queueing.
Subsequent block layer calls of virtio_blk's request function will
fail, resulting in appropriate I/O errors.
Signed-off-by: Heinz Graalfs <graalfs at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
2013 Nov 21
0
[PATCH v2 RFC 2/3] virtio_blk: add virtblk_notify() as virtio_driver's notify() callback
Add virtblk_notify() as virtio_driver's notify() callback.
When a transport driver is notified that a device disappeared it
should invoke this callback to prevent further request queueing.
Subsequent block layer calls of virtio_blk's request function will
fail, resulting in appropriate I/O errors.
Signed-off-by: Heinz Graalfs <graalfs at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---