Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "virtio_dma_".
Did you mean:
virtio_dma
2023 Jul 28
1
[PATCH vhost v11 05/10] virtio_ring: introduce virtqueue_dma_dev()
...2023 at 10:13:48AM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> > > On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 09:43:42 -0700, Christoph Hellwig <hch at infradead.org> wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 01:21:07PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > > Well I think we can add wrappers like virtio_dma_sync and so on.
> > > > > There are NOP for non-dma so passing the dma device is harmless.
> > > >
> > > > Yes, please.
> > >
> > >
> > > I am not sure I got this fully.
> > >
> > > Are you mean this:
> > >...
2023 Aug 01
1
[PATCH vhost v11 05/10] virtio_ring: introduce virtqueue_dma_dev()
...48AM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 09:43:42 -0700, Christoph Hellwig <hch at infradead.org> wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 01:21:07PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > > > Well I think we can add wrappers like virtio_dma_sync and so on.
> > > > > > There are NOP for non-dma so passing the dma device is harmless.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, please.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I am not sure I got this fully.
> > > >
> > >...
2023 Jul 31
0
[PATCH vhost v11 05/10] virtio_ring: introduce virtqueue_dma_dev()
...l 28, 2023 at 11:03?PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba at kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 28 Jul 2023 14:02:33 +0800 Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> > Hi guys, this topic is stuck again. How should I proceed with this work?
> >
> > Let me briefly summarize:
> > 1. The problem with adding virtio_dma_{map, sync} api is that, for AF_XDP and
> > the driver layer, we need to support these APIs. The current conclusion of
> > AF_XDP is no.
> >
> > 2. Set dma_set_mask_and_coherent, then we can use DMA API uniformly inside
> > driver. This idea seems to be inconsistent wit...
2023 Jul 31
0
[PATCH vhost v11 05/10] virtio_ring: introduce virtqueue_dma_dev()
...28 Jul 2023 08:03:05 -0700, Jakub Kicinski <kuba at kernel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jul 2023 14:02:33 +0800 Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> > Hi guys, this topic is stuck again. How should I proceed with this work?
> >
> > Let me briefly summarize:
> > 1. The problem with adding virtio_dma_{map, sync} api is that, for AF_XDP and
> > the driver layer, we need to support these APIs. The current conclusion of
> > AF_XDP is no.
> >
> > 2. Set dma_set_mask_and_coherent, then we can use DMA API uniformly inside
> > driver. This idea seems to be inconsistent wit...