search for: virtio_crypto_ablkcipher_crypt_req

...q); } static int virtio_crypto_ablkcipher_init(struct crypto_tfm *tfm) @@ -521,6 +522,9 @@ static int virtio_crypto_ablkcipher_init(struct crypto_tfm *tfm) tfm->crt_ablkcipher.reqsize = sizeof(struct virtio_crypto_sym_request); ctx->tfm = tfm; + ctx->enginectx.op.do_one_request = virtio_crypto_ablkcipher_crypt_req; + ctx->enginectx.op.prepare_request = NULL; + ctx->enginectx.op.unprepare_request = NULL; return 0; } @@ -538,9 +542,9 @@ static void virtio_crypto_ablkcipher_exit(struct crypto_tfm *tfm) } int virtio_crypto_ablkcipher_crypt_req( - struct crypto_engine *engine, - struct ablkcipher_r...

..._ctx(tfm); + struct virtio_crypto_skcipher_ctx *ctx = crypto_skcipher_ctx(tfm); - tfm->crt_ablkcipher.reqsize = sizeof(struct virtio_crypto_sym_request); + crypto_skcipher_set_reqsize(tfm, sizeof(struct virtio_crypto_sym_request)); ctx->tfm = tfm; - ctx->enginectx.op.do_one_request = virtio_crypto_ablkcipher_crypt_req; + ctx->enginectx.op.do_one_request = virtio_crypto_skcipher_crypt_req; ctx->enginectx.op.prepare_request = NULL; ctx->enginectx.op.unprepare_request = NULL; return 0; } -static void virtio_crypto_ablkcipher_exit(struct crypto_tfm *tfm) +static void virtio_crypto_skcipher_exit(str...

..._ctx(tfm); + struct virtio_crypto_skcipher_ctx *ctx = crypto_skcipher_ctx(tfm); - tfm->crt_ablkcipher.reqsize = sizeof(struct virtio_crypto_sym_request); + crypto_skcipher_set_reqsize(tfm, sizeof(struct virtio_crypto_sym_request)); ctx->tfm = tfm; - ctx->enginectx.op.do_one_request = virtio_crypto_ablkcipher_crypt_req; + ctx->enginectx.op.do_one_request = virtio_crypto_skcipher_crypt_req; ctx->enginectx.op.prepare_request = NULL; ctx->enginectx.op.unprepare_request = NULL; return 0; } -static void virtio_crypto_ablkcipher_exit(struct crypto_tfm *tfm) +static void virtio_crypto_skcipher_exit(str...

..._vq; - return -EINPROGRESS; + return crypto_transfer_cipher_request_to_engine(data_vq->engine, req); } static int virtio_crypto_ablkcipher_init(struct crypto_tfm *tfm) @@ -484,6 +475,33 @@ static void virtio_crypto_ablkcipher_exit(struct crypto_tfm *tfm) ctx->vcrypto = NULL; } +int virtio_crypto_ablkcipher_crypt_req( + struct crypto_engine *engine, + struct ablkcipher_request *req) +{ + struct virtio_crypto_request *vc_req = ablkcipher_request_ctx(req); + struct data_queue *data_vq = vc_req->dataq; + int ret; + + ret = __virtio_crypto_ablkcipher_do_req(vc_req, req, data_vq); + if (ret < 0) + return ret;...

..._vq; - return -EINPROGRESS; + return crypto_transfer_cipher_request_to_engine(data_vq->engine, req); } static int virtio_crypto_ablkcipher_init(struct crypto_tfm *tfm) @@ -484,6 +475,33 @@ static void virtio_crypto_ablkcipher_exit(struct crypto_tfm *tfm) ctx->vcrypto = NULL; } +int virtio_crypto_ablkcipher_crypt_req( + struct crypto_engine *engine, + struct ablkcipher_request *req) +{ + struct virtio_crypto_request *vc_req = ablkcipher_request_ctx(req); + struct data_queue *data_vq = vc_req->dataq; + int ret; + + ret = __virtio_crypto_ablkcipher_do_req(vc_req, req, data_vq); + if (ret < 0) + return ret;...

Hello The current crypto_engine support only ahash and ablkcipher request. My first patch which try to add skcipher was Nacked, it will add too many functions and adding other algs(aead, asymetric_key) will make the situation worst. This patchset remove all algs specific stuff and now only process generic crypto_async_request. The requests handler function pointer are now moved out of struct

Hello The current crypto_engine support only ahash and ablkcipher request. My first patch which try to add skcipher was Nacked, it will add too many functions and adding other algs(aead, asymetric_key) will make the situation worst. This patchset remove all algs specific stuff and now only process generic crypto_async_request. The requests handler function pointer are now moved out of struct

On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 04:43:46PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote: > __virtio_crypto_ablkcipher_do_req() is never called in atomic context. > > __virtio_crypto_ablkcipher_do_req() is only called by > virtio_crypto_ablkcipher_crypt_req(), which is only called by > virtcrypto_find_vqs() that is never called in atomic context. > > __virtio_crypto_ablkcipher_do_req() calls kzalloc_node() with GFP_ATOMIC, > which is not necessary. > GFP_ATOMIC can be replaced with GFP_KERNEL. > > This is found by a static anal...

Hello The current crypto_engine support only ahash and ablkcipher. My first patch which try to add skcipher was Nacked, it will add too many functions and adding other algs(aead, asymetric_key) will make the situation worst. This patchset remove all algs specific stuff and now only process generic crypto_async_request. The requests handler function pointer are now moved out of struct engine and

Hello The current crypto_engine support only ahash and ablkcipher. My first patch which try to add skcipher was Nacked, it will add too many functions and adding other algs(aead, asymetric_key) will make the situation worst. This patchset remove all algs specific stuff and now only process generic crypto_async_request. The requests handler function pointer are now moved out of struct engine and

Hello The current crypto_engine support only ahash and ablkcipher request. My first patch which try to add skcipher was Nacked, it will add too many functions and adding other algs(aead, asymetric_key) will make the situation worst. This patchset remove all algs specific stuff and now only process generic crypto_async_request. The requests handler function pointer are now moved out of struct