search for: virtio_ccw_kvm_notifi

On Wed, 22 Mar 2023 17:10:31 +0300, Viktor Prutyanov <viktor at daynix.com> wrote: > According to VirtIO spec v1.2, VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA feature > indicates that the driver passes extra data along with the queue > notifications. > > In a split queue case, the extra data is 16-bit available index. In a > packed queue case, the extra data is 1-bit wrap counter and

On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 10:18:56AM +0300, Viktor Prutyanov wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 4:22?AM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo at linux.alibaba.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 22 Mar 2023 17:10:31 +0300, Viktor Prutyanov <viktor at daynix.com> wrote: > > > According to VirtIO spec v1.2, VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA feature > > > indicates that the driver passes

On Thu, 23 Mar 2023 11:55:51 +0300, Viktor Prutyanov <viktor at daynix.com> wrote: > According to VirtIO spec v1.2, VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA feature > indicates that the driver passes extra data along with the queue > notifications. > > In a split queue case, the extra data is 16-bit available index. In a > packed queue case, the extra data is 1-bit wrap counter and

On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 05:10:31PM +0300, Viktor Prutyanov wrote: > According to VirtIO spec v1.2, VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA feature > indicates that the driver passes extra data along with the queue > notifications. > > In a split queue case, the extra data is 16-bit available index. In a > packed queue case, the extra data is 1-bit wrap counter and 15-bit > available

On Fri, 5 Apr 2019 01:16:11 +0200 Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> wrote: > The commit 2a2d1382fe9d ("virtio: Add improved queue allocation API") > establishes a new way of allocating virtqueues (as a part of the effort > that taught DMA to virtio rings). > > In the future we will want virtio-ccw to use the DMA API as well. > > Let us switch from the

Currently a host kick error is silently ignored and not reflected in the virtqueue of a particular virtio device. Changing the notify API for guest->host notification seems to be one prerequisite in order to be able to handle such errors in the context where the kick is triggered. This patch changes the notify API. The notify function must return a negative int return value in case the host

The commit 2a2d1382fe9d ("virtio: Add improved queue allocation API") establishes a new way of allocating virtqueues (as a part of the effort that taught DMA to virtio rings). In the future we will want virtio-ccw to use the DMA API as well. Let us switch from the legacy method of allocating virtqueues to vring_create_virtqueue() as the first step into that direction. Signed-off-by:

Hi, this patch-set solves a hang situation when a vlan network device is hot-unplugged from a KVM guest. On System z there exists no handshake mechanism between host and guest when a device is hot-unplugged. The device is removed and no further I/O is possible. The guest is notified about the hard removal with a CRW machine check. As per architecture, the host must repond to any I/O operation

Hi, this patch-set solves a hang situation when a vlan network device is hot-unplugged from a KVM guest. On System z there exists no handshake mechanism between host and guest when a device is hot-unplugged. The device is removed and no further I/O is possible. The guest is notified about the hard removal with a CRW machine check. As per architecture, the host must repond to any I/O operation

Rusty, here is just patch 1 (using bool as return value in notify API). Thanks. Heinz Graalfs (9): virtio_ring: change host notification API virtio_ring: let virtqueue_{kick()/notify()} return a bool virtio_net: verify if virtqueue_kick() succeeded virtio_test: verify if virtqueue_kick() succeeded virtio_ring: add new function virtqueue_is_broken() virtio_blk: verify if queue is

Rusty, here is just patch 1 (using bool as return value in notify API). Thanks. Heinz Graalfs (9): virtio_ring: change host notification API virtio_ring: let virtqueue_{kick()/notify()} return a bool virtio_net: verify if virtqueue_kick() succeeded virtio_test: verify if virtqueue_kick() succeeded virtio_ring: add new function virtqueue_is_broken() virtio_blk: verify if queue is

On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 04:27:45PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > Here's the latest version of my patch series enabling ioeventfds > on s390, again against kvm-next. > > Patches 1 and 2 (cleaning up initialization and exporting the virtio-ccw > api) would make sense even independent of the ioeventfd enhancements. > > Patches 3-5 are concerned with adding a new type of

On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 04:27:45PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > Here's the latest version of my patch series enabling ioeventfds > on s390, again against kvm-next. > > Patches 1 and 2 (cleaning up initialization and exporting the virtio-ccw > api) would make sense even independent of the ioeventfd enhancements. > > Patches 3-5 are concerned with adding a new type of

From: Pierre Morel <pmorel at linux.vnet.ibm.com> In virtio_ccw_read_vq_conf() the return value of ccw_io_helper() was not checked. If the configuration could not be read properly, we'd wrongly assume a queue size of 0. Let's propagate any I/O error to virtio_ccw_setup_vq() so it may properly fail. Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel at linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by:

Michael, here's a bugfix for the virtio-ccw driver. Question: How would you like to get patches? This one is formatted against your current linux-next branch; I can prepare a branch for you to pull from as well. Pierre Morel (1): virtio/s390: handle failures of READ_VQ_CONF ccw drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c | 10 +++++++++- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 2.3.8

Michael, here's a bugfix for the virtio-ccw driver. Question: How would you like to get patches? This one is formatted against your current linux-next branch; I can prepare a branch for you to pull from as well. Pierre Morel (1): virtio/s390: handle failures of READ_VQ_CONF ccw drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c | 10 +++++++++- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 2.3.8

On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 12:00:42PM +0300, Viktor Prutyanov wrote: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 5:29?AM Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 7:21?AM Viktor Prutyanov <viktor at daynix.com> wrote: > > > > > > According to VirtIO spec v1.2, VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA feature > > > indicates that the driver passes

Allows maintaining extra context per vq. For ease of use, passing in NULL is legal and disables the feature for all vqs. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- drivers/misc/mic/vop/vop_main.c | 9 ++++++--- drivers/s390/virtio/kvm_virtio.c | 6 ++++-- drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c | 7 ++++--- drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c | 8 +++++---

Allows maintaining extra context per vq. For ease of use, passing in NULL is legal and disables the feature for all vqs. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- drivers/misc/mic/vop/vop_main.c | 9 ++++++--- drivers/s390/virtio/kvm_virtio.c | 6 ++++-- drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c | 7 ++++--- drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c | 8 +++++---

On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 04:44:10PM +0300, Viktor Prutyanov wrote: > According to VirtIO spec v1.2, VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA feature > indicates that the driver passes extra data along with the queue > notifications. > > In a split queue case, the extra data is 16-bit available index. In a > packed queue case, the extra data is 1-bit wrap counter and 15-bit > available