search for: virtio_ccw_cio_notifi

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 38 matches for "virtio_ccw_cio_notifi".

Did you mean: virtio_ccw_cio_notify
2018 Feb 12
2
[PULL v2 1/1] virtio/s390: implement PM operations for virtio_ccw
Michael, Conny, it seems that this patch did not make it into 4.16-rc1. On 12/18/2017 05:21 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> > > Suspend/Resume to/from disk currently fails. Let us wire > up the necessary callbacks. This is mostly just forwarding > the requests to the virtio drivers. The only thing that > has to be done
2018 Feb 12
2
[PULL v2 1/1] virtio/s390: implement PM operations for virtio_ccw
Michael, Conny, it seems that this patch did not make it into 4.16-rc1. On 12/18/2017 05:21 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> > > Suspend/Resume to/from disk currently fails. Let us wire > up the necessary callbacks. This is mostly just forwarding > the requests to the virtio drivers. The only thing that > has to be done
2017 Dec 18
2
[PULL v2 0/1] s390/virtio update
The following changes since commit 20677394b78ed4c4baa09c9a1bcfdf24d2b09fe4: Merge branch 'vhost' into vhost-next (2017-12-18 08:21:38 +0200) are available in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvms390/linux.git tags/virtio-s390-20171218-v2 for you to fetch changes up to 352d303fa99330e5d197afcc28b5270734e5c541: virtio/s390: implement PM
2017 Dec 18
2
[PULL v2 0/1] s390/virtio update
The following changes since commit 20677394b78ed4c4baa09c9a1bcfdf24d2b09fe4: Merge branch 'vhost' into vhost-next (2017-12-18 08:21:38 +0200) are available in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvms390/linux.git tags/virtio-s390-20171218-v2 for you to fetch changes up to 352d303fa99330e5d197afcc28b5270734e5c541: virtio/s390: implement PM
2020 May 26
3
[PATCH] s390/virtio: remove unused pm callbacks
Support for hibernation on s390 has been recently been removed with commit 394216275c7d ("s390: remove broken hibernate / power management support"), no need to keep unused code around. Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck at redhat.com> --- drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c | 26 -------------------------- 1 file changed, 26 deletions(-) diff --git
2020 May 26
3
[PATCH] s390/virtio: remove unused pm callbacks
Support for hibernation on s390 has been recently been removed with commit 394216275c7d ("s390: remove broken hibernate / power management support"), no need to keep unused code around. Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck at redhat.com> --- drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c | 26 -------------------------- 1 file changed, 26 deletions(-) diff --git
2017 Dec 18
3
[PATCH] virtio/s390: fixup for implement PM operations for virtio_ccw
We need to disable the pm callbacks if CONFIG_PM is not set. Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> --- Cornelia, you might want to squash this into the original commit. drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c b/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c index 330b3fa3430a..985184ebda45
2017 Dec 18
3
[PATCH] virtio/s390: fixup for implement PM operations for virtio_ccw
We need to disable the pm callbacks if CONFIG_PM is not set. Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> --- Cornelia, you might want to squash this into the original commit. drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c b/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c index 330b3fa3430a..985184ebda45
2013 Nov 21
2
[PATCH v2 RFC 3/3] virtio_ccw: invoke virtio_driver's notify() on CIO_GONE notification
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 03:45:33PM +0100, Heinz Graalfs wrote: > virtio_ccw's notify() callback for the common IO layer invokes > virtio_driver's notify() callback to pass-on information to a > backend driver if an online device disappeared. > > Signed-off-by: Heinz Graalfs <graalfs at linux.vnet.ibm.com> simple question: is this serialized with device removal? If
2013 Nov 21
2
[PATCH v2 RFC 3/3] virtio_ccw: invoke virtio_driver's notify() on CIO_GONE notification
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 03:45:33PM +0100, Heinz Graalfs wrote: > virtio_ccw's notify() callback for the common IO layer invokes > virtio_driver's notify() callback to pass-on information to a > backend driver if an online device disappeared. > > Signed-off-by: Heinz Graalfs <graalfs at linux.vnet.ibm.com> simple question: is this serialized with device removal? If
2017 Dec 07
3
[PATCH 0/1] suspend/resume for virtio_ccw
With this patch I can suspend/resume a KVM guest. [root at test ~]# cd /sys/power/ [root at test power]# echo test_resume > disk [root at test power]# lscss Device Subchan. DevType CU Type Use PIM PAM POM CHPIDs ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.0.0003 0.0.0000 0000/00 3832/03 yes 80 80 ff 00000000 00000000 0.0.0000 0.0.0001
2017 Dec 07
3
[PATCH 0/1] suspend/resume for virtio_ccw
With this patch I can suspend/resume a KVM guest. [root at test ~]# cd /sys/power/ [root at test power]# echo test_resume > disk [root at test power]# lscss Device Subchan. DevType CU Type Use PIM PAM POM CHPIDs ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.0.0003 0.0.0000 0000/00 3832/03 yes 80 80 ff 00000000 00000000 0.0.0000 0.0.0001
2017 Dec 07
0
[PATCH 1/1] virtio/s390: implement PM operations for virtio_ccw
Suspend/Resume to/from disk currently fails. Let us wire up the necessary callbacks. This is mostly just forwarding the requests to the virtio drivers. The only thing that has to be done in virtio_ccw itself is to re-set the virtio revision. Suggested-by: Thomas Huth <thuth at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> ---
2017 Dec 18
0
[PULL v2 1/1] virtio/s390: implement PM operations for virtio_ccw
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> Suspend/Resume to/from disk currently fails. Let us wire up the necessary callbacks. This is mostly just forwarding the requests to the virtio drivers. The only thing that has to be done in virtio_ccw itself is to re-set the virtio revision. Suggested-by: Thomas Huth <thuth at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger
2018 Feb 14
0
[PULL v2 1/1] virtio/s390: implement PM operations for virtio_ccw
On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 09:52:00 +0100 Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> wrote: > Michael, Conny, > it seems that this patch did not make it into 4.16-rc1. Michael, please let me know what you plan to do with the virtio-s390-20171218-v2 pull request. > > > > On 12/18/2017 05:21 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger
2017 Dec 14
2
[PULL 0/1] s390/virtio update
The following changes since commit e073f74a5a39c6dc45f28a5006c21aa94490d9b8: Merge branch 'this' into vhost (2017-12-07 18:39:24 +0200) are available in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvms390/linux.git tags/virtio-s390-20171214 for you to fetch changes up to 619b4b0ba832144d4be899640a2047f9675df849: virtio/s390: implement PM operations for
2017 Dec 14
2
[PULL 0/1] s390/virtio update
The following changes since commit e073f74a5a39c6dc45f28a5006c21aa94490d9b8: Merge branch 'this' into vhost (2017-12-07 18:39:24 +0200) are available in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvms390/linux.git tags/virtio-s390-20171214 for you to fetch changes up to 619b4b0ba832144d4be899640a2047f9675df849: virtio/s390: implement PM operations for
2013 Nov 21
2
[PATCH v2 RFC 3/3] virtio_ccw: invoke virtio_driver's notify() on CIO_GONE notification
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 06:12:21PM +0100, Heinz Graalfs wrote: > On 21/11/13 16:15, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 03:45:33PM +0100, Heinz Graalfs wrote: > >>virtio_ccw's notify() callback for the common IO layer invokes > >>virtio_driver's notify() callback to pass-on information to a > >>backend driver if an online device
2013 Nov 21
2
[PATCH v2 RFC 3/3] virtio_ccw: invoke virtio_driver's notify() on CIO_GONE notification
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 06:12:21PM +0100, Heinz Graalfs wrote: > On 21/11/13 16:15, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 03:45:33PM +0100, Heinz Graalfs wrote: > >>virtio_ccw's notify() callback for the common IO layer invokes > >>virtio_driver's notify() callback to pass-on information to a > >>backend driver if an online device
2013 Nov 21
5
[PATCH v2 RFC 0/3] virtio: add new notify() callback to virtio_driver
Hi, here is an updated patch-set with changes as suggested by Michael Tsirkin. When an active virtio block device is hot-unplugged from a KVM guest, running affected guest user applications are not aware of any errors that occur due to the lost device. This patch-set adds code to avoid further request queueing when a lost block device is detected, resulting in appropriate error info. On System z