Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "virtio_blk_f_any_sg".
2013 Jun 13
2
[PATCH] virtio-spec: add field for scsi command size
...ere already, isn't it:
>
> If VIRTIO_BLK_F_SCSI_CMD_SIZE is not negotiated,
> This field must reside in a single, separate read-only buffer;
> the command length
> can be derived from the length of this buffer.
>
Wait, I think I got it: you actually want to rename this
VIRTIO_BLK_F_ANY_SG and have it affect all requests?
>
>
> > Thanks,
> > Rusty.
2013 Jun 13
2
[PATCH] virtio-spec: add field for scsi command size
...ere already, isn't it:
>
> If VIRTIO_BLK_F_SCSI_CMD_SIZE is not negotiated,
> This field must reside in a single, separate read-only buffer;
> the command length
> can be derived from the length of this buffer.
>
Wait, I think I got it: you actually want to rename this
VIRTIO_BLK_F_ANY_SG and have it affect all requests?
>
>
> > Thanks,
> > Rusty.
2013 Jun 19
3
[PATCH] virtio-spec: add field for scsi command size
..._SIZE is not negotiated,
>> > This field must reside in a single, separate read-only buffer;
>> > the command length
>> > can be derived from the length of this buffer.
>> >
>>
>> Wait, I think I got it: you actually want to rename this
>> VIRTIO_BLK_F_ANY_SG and have it affect all requests?
>
> Sorry about being dense - could you please clarify?
OK, here's the new section I've written (but not committed!) on Message
Framing:
Message Framing
The original intent of the specification was that message framing
(the particular layout of...
2013 Jun 19
3
[PATCH] virtio-spec: add field for scsi command size
..._SIZE is not negotiated,
>> > This field must reside in a single, separate read-only buffer;
>> > the command length
>> > can be derived from the length of this buffer.
>> >
>>
>> Wait, I think I got it: you actually want to rename this
>> VIRTIO_BLK_F_ANY_SG and have it affect all requests?
>
> Sorry about being dense - could you please clarify?
OK, here's the new section I've written (but not committed!) on Message
Framing:
Message Framing
The original intent of the specification was that message framing
(the particular layout of...
2013 Jun 17
0
[PATCH] virtio-spec: add field for scsi command size
...t; If VIRTIO_BLK_F_SCSI_CMD_SIZE is not negotiated,
> > This field must reside in a single, separate read-only buffer;
> > the command length
> > can be derived from the length of this buffer.
> >
>
> Wait, I think I got it: you actually want to rename this
> VIRTIO_BLK_F_ANY_SG and have it affect all requests?
Sorry about being dense - could you please clarify?
> >
> >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Rusty.
2013 Jun 19
0
[PATCH] virtio-spec: add field for scsi command size
...gt; > This field must reside in a single, separate read-only buffer;
> >> > the command length
> >> > can be derived from the length of this buffer.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Wait, I think I got it: you actually want to rename this
> >> VIRTIO_BLK_F_ANY_SG and have it affect all requests?
> >
> > Sorry about being dense - could you please clarify?
>
> OK, here's the new section I've written (but not committed!) on Message
> Framing:
>
> Message Framing
>
> The original intent of the specification was tha...
2013 Jun 13
3
[PATCH] virtio-spec: add field for scsi command size
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> writes:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 04:15:28PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 14/03/2013 12:10, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
>> > Add field for guest to specify command size for virtio-blk.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
>
> OK, but Rusty usually tweaks
2013 Jun 13
3
[PATCH] virtio-spec: add field for scsi command size
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> writes:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 04:15:28PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 14/03/2013 12:10, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
>> > Add field for guest to specify command size for virtio-blk.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
>
> OK, but Rusty usually tweaks