search for: virtblks

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 66 matches for "virtblks".

Did you mean: virtblk
2012 Mar 28
2
[PATCH] virtio_blk: add helper function to support mass of disks naming
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 02:54:43PM +0800, Ren Mingxin wrote: > Hi, > > The current virtblk's naming algorithm just supports 26^3 > disks. If there are mass of virtblks(exceeding 26^3), there > will be disks with the same name. > > According to "sd_format_disk_name()", I add function > "virtblk_name_format()" for virtblk to support mass of > disks. > > Signed-off-by: Ren Mingxin <renmx at cn.fujitsu.com> Nod. This...
2012 Mar 28
2
[PATCH] virtio_blk: add helper function to support mass of disks naming
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 02:54:43PM +0800, Ren Mingxin wrote: > Hi, > > The current virtblk's naming algorithm just supports 26^3 > disks. If there are mass of virtblks(exceeding 26^3), there > will be disks with the same name. > > According to "sd_format_disk_name()", I add function > "virtblk_name_format()" for virtblk to support mass of > disks. > > Signed-off-by: Ren Mingxin <renmx at cn.fujitsu.com> Nod. This...
2014 Oct 23
2
[PATCH] virtio_blk: fix race at module removal
If a device appears while module is being removed, driver will get a callback after we've given up on the major number. In theory this means this major number can get reused by something else, resulting in a conflict. To fix, cleanup in reverse order of initialization. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1
2014 Oct 23
2
[PATCH] virtio_blk: fix race at module removal
If a device appears while module is being removed, driver will get a callback after we've given up on the major number. In theory this means this major number can get reused by something else, resulting in a conflict. To fix, cleanup in reverse order of initialization. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1
2012 Mar 30
10
[PATCH 0/4] block: move sd_format_disk_name() into block core as disk_name_format()
This patch series renames "sd_format_disk_name()" to "disk_name_format()" and moves it into block core. So that who needs formatting disk name can use it, instead of duplicating these similar help functions. Ren Mingxin (4): block: add function disk_name_format() into block core scsi: replace sd_format_disk_name() to disk_name_format() block: replace
2012 Mar 30
10
[PATCH 0/4] block: move sd_format_disk_name() into block core as disk_name_format()
This patch series renames "sd_format_disk_name()" to "disk_name_format()" and moves it into block core. So that who needs formatting disk name can use it, instead of duplicating these similar help functions. Ren Mingxin (4): block: add function disk_name_format() into block core scsi: replace sd_format_disk_name() to disk_name_format() block: replace
2008 Jan 31
4
[PATCH] virtio_blk: Dont waste major numbers
Rusty, currently virtio_blk uses one major number per device. While this works quite well on most systems it is wasteful and will exhaust major numbers on larger installations. This patch allocates a major number on init and will use 16 minor numbers for each disk. That will allow ~64k virtio_blk disks. Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> ---
2008 Jan 31
4
[PATCH] virtio_blk: Dont waste major numbers
Rusty, currently virtio_blk uses one major number per device. While this works quite well on most systems it is wasteful and will exhaust major numbers on larger installations. This patch allocates a major number on init and will use 16 minor numbers for each disk. That will allow ~64k virtio_blk disks. Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> ---
2017 Nov 20
0
4.14: WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 2895 at block/blk-mq.c:1144 with virtio-blk
On 11/20/2017 01:49 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > > On 11/20/2017 08:42 PM, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 11/20/2017 12:29 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 11/20/2017 08:20 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: >>>> On Fri, 2017-11-17 at 15:42 +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >>>>> This is >>>>>
2017 Nov 21
2
4.14: WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 2895 at block/blk-mq.c:1144 with virtio-blk
On 11/20/2017 09:52 PM, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 11/20/2017 01:49 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >> >> >> On 11/20/2017 08:42 PM, Jens Axboe wrote: >>> On 11/20/2017 12:29 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 11/20/2017 08:20 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 2017-11-17 at 15:42 +0100, Christian
2017 Nov 21
2
4.14: WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 2895 at block/blk-mq.c:1144 with virtio-blk
On 11/20/2017 09:52 PM, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 11/20/2017 01:49 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >> >> >> On 11/20/2017 08:42 PM, Jens Axboe wrote: >>> On 11/20/2017 12:29 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 11/20/2017 08:20 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 2017-11-17 at 15:42 +0100, Christian
2011 Jan 27
1
[PATCH] virtio_blk: allow re-reading config space at runtime
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 05:01:37PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Wire up the virtio_driver config_changed method to get notified about > config changes raised by the host. For now we just re-read the device > size to support online resizing of devices, but once we add more > attributes that might be changeable they could be added as well. > > Note that the config_changed
2011 Jan 27
1
[PATCH] virtio_blk: allow re-reading config space at runtime
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 05:01:37PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Wire up the virtio_driver config_changed method to get notified about > config changes raised by the host. For now we just re-read the device > size to support online resizing of devices, but once we add more > attributes that might be changeable they could be added as well. > > Note that the config_changed
2017 Nov 20
2
4.14: WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 2895 at block/blk-mq.c:1144 with virtio-blk
On 11/20/2017 08:42 PM, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 11/20/2017 12:29 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >> >> >> On 11/20/2017 08:20 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: >>> On Fri, 2017-11-17 at 15:42 +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >>>> This is >>>> >>>> b7a71e66d (Jens Axboe 2017-08-01 09:28:24 -0600 1141) * are mapped to
2017 Nov 20
2
4.14: WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 2895 at block/blk-mq.c:1144 with virtio-blk
On 11/20/2017 08:42 PM, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 11/20/2017 12:29 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >> >> >> On 11/20/2017 08:20 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: >>> On Fri, 2017-11-17 at 15:42 +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >>>> This is >>>> >>>> b7a71e66d (Jens Axboe 2017-08-01 09:28:24 -0600 1141) * are mapped to
2014 Oct 24
0
[PATCH] virtio_blk: fix race at module removal
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > If a device appears while module is being removed, > driver will get a callback after we've given up > on the major number. > > In theory this means this major number can get reused > by something else, resulting in a conflict. Yes, there is a tiny race window. > > To fix, cleanup
2014 Nov 24
0
[PATCH v3 18/41] virtio_blk: fix race at module removal
If a device appears while module is being removed, driver will get a callback after we've given up on the major number. In theory this means this major number can get reused by something else, resulting in a conflict. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git
2014 Nov 25
1
[PATCH v4 19/42] virtio_blk: fix race at module removal
If a device appears while module is being removed, driver will get a callback after we've given up on the major number. In theory this means this major number can get reused by something else, resulting in a conflict. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git
2014 Nov 27
0
[PATCH v5 21/45] virtio_blk: fix race at module removal
If a device appears while module is being removed, driver will get a callback after we've given up on the major number. In theory this means this major number can get reused by something else, resulting in a conflict. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git
2014 Nov 27
0
[PATCH v6 22/46] virtio_blk: fix race at module removal
If a device appears while module is being removed, driver will get a callback after we've given up on the major number. In theory this means this major number can get reused by something else, resulting in a conflict. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git