Displaying 20 results from an estimated 66 matches for "virtblks".
Did you mean:
virtblk
2012 Mar 28
2
[PATCH] virtio_blk: add helper function to support mass of disks naming
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 02:54:43PM +0800, Ren Mingxin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The current virtblk's naming algorithm just supports 26^3
> disks. If there are mass of virtblks(exceeding 26^3), there
> will be disks with the same name.
>
> According to "sd_format_disk_name()", I add function
> "virtblk_name_format()" for virtblk to support mass of
> disks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ren Mingxin <renmx at cn.fujitsu.com>
Nod. This...
2012 Mar 28
2
[PATCH] virtio_blk: add helper function to support mass of disks naming
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 02:54:43PM +0800, Ren Mingxin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The current virtblk's naming algorithm just supports 26^3
> disks. If there are mass of virtblks(exceeding 26^3), there
> will be disks with the same name.
>
> According to "sd_format_disk_name()", I add function
> "virtblk_name_format()" for virtblk to support mass of
> disks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ren Mingxin <renmx at cn.fujitsu.com>
Nod. This...
2014 Oct 23
2
[PATCH] virtio_blk: fix race at module removal
If a device appears while module is being removed,
driver will get a callback after we've given up
on the major number.
In theory this means this major number can get reused
by something else, resulting in a conflict.
To fix, cleanup in reverse order of initialization.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
---
drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1
2014 Oct 23
2
[PATCH] virtio_blk: fix race at module removal
If a device appears while module is being removed,
driver will get a callback after we've given up
on the major number.
In theory this means this major number can get reused
by something else, resulting in a conflict.
To fix, cleanup in reverse order of initialization.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
---
drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1
2012 Mar 30
10
[PATCH 0/4] block: move sd_format_disk_name() into block core as disk_name_format()
This patch series renames "sd_format_disk_name()" to
"disk_name_format()" and moves it into block core. So
that who needs formatting disk name can use it, instead
of duplicating these similar help functions.
Ren Mingxin (4):
block: add function disk_name_format() into block core
scsi: replace sd_format_disk_name() to disk_name_format()
block: replace
2012 Mar 30
10
[PATCH 0/4] block: move sd_format_disk_name() into block core as disk_name_format()
This patch series renames "sd_format_disk_name()" to
"disk_name_format()" and moves it into block core. So
that who needs formatting disk name can use it, instead
of duplicating these similar help functions.
Ren Mingxin (4):
block: add function disk_name_format() into block core
scsi: replace sd_format_disk_name() to disk_name_format()
block: replace
2008 Jan 31
4
[PATCH] virtio_blk: Dont waste major numbers
Rusty,
currently virtio_blk uses one major number per device. While this works
quite well on most systems it is wasteful and will exhaust major numbers
on larger installations.
This patch allocates a major number on init and will use 16 minor numbers
for each disk. That will allow ~64k virtio_blk disks.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
---
2008 Jan 31
4
[PATCH] virtio_blk: Dont waste major numbers
Rusty,
currently virtio_blk uses one major number per device. While this works
quite well on most systems it is wasteful and will exhaust major numbers
on larger installations.
This patch allocates a major number on init and will use 16 minor numbers
for each disk. That will allow ~64k virtio_blk disks.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
---
2017 Nov 20
0
4.14: WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 2895 at block/blk-mq.c:1144 with virtio-blk
On 11/20/2017 01:49 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>
> On 11/20/2017 08:42 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 11/20/2017 12:29 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/20/2017 08:20 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 2017-11-17 at 15:42 +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>>>> This is
>>>>>
2017 Nov 21
2
4.14: WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 2895 at block/blk-mq.c:1144 with virtio-blk
On 11/20/2017 09:52 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 11/20/2017 01:49 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/20/2017 08:42 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 11/20/2017 12:29 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 11/20/2017 08:20 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 2017-11-17 at 15:42 +0100, Christian
2017 Nov 21
2
4.14: WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 2895 at block/blk-mq.c:1144 with virtio-blk
On 11/20/2017 09:52 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 11/20/2017 01:49 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/20/2017 08:42 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 11/20/2017 12:29 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 11/20/2017 08:20 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 2017-11-17 at 15:42 +0100, Christian
2011 Jan 27
1
[PATCH] virtio_blk: allow re-reading config space at runtime
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 05:01:37PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Wire up the virtio_driver config_changed method to get notified about
> config changes raised by the host. For now we just re-read the device
> size to support online resizing of devices, but once we add more
> attributes that might be changeable they could be added as well.
>
> Note that the config_changed
2011 Jan 27
1
[PATCH] virtio_blk: allow re-reading config space at runtime
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 05:01:37PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Wire up the virtio_driver config_changed method to get notified about
> config changes raised by the host. For now we just re-read the device
> size to support online resizing of devices, but once we add more
> attributes that might be changeable they could be added as well.
>
> Note that the config_changed
2017 Nov 20
2
4.14: WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 2895 at block/blk-mq.c:1144 with virtio-blk
On 11/20/2017 08:42 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 11/20/2017 12:29 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/20/2017 08:20 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2017-11-17 at 15:42 +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>>> This is
>>>>
>>>> b7a71e66d (Jens Axboe 2017-08-01 09:28:24 -0600 1141) * are mapped to
2017 Nov 20
2
4.14: WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 2895 at block/blk-mq.c:1144 with virtio-blk
On 11/20/2017 08:42 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 11/20/2017 12:29 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/20/2017 08:20 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2017-11-17 at 15:42 +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>>> This is
>>>>
>>>> b7a71e66d (Jens Axboe 2017-08-01 09:28:24 -0600 1141) * are mapped to
2014 Oct 24
0
[PATCH] virtio_blk: fix race at module removal
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
> If a device appears while module is being removed,
> driver will get a callback after we've given up
> on the major number.
>
> In theory this means this major number can get reused
> by something else, resulting in a conflict.
Yes, there is a tiny race window.
>
> To fix, cleanup
2014 Nov 24
0
[PATCH v3 18/41] virtio_blk: fix race at module removal
If a device appears while module is being removed,
driver will get a callback after we've given up
on the major number.
In theory this means this major number can get reused
by something else, resulting in a conflict.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
---
drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
2014 Nov 25
1
[PATCH v4 19/42] virtio_blk: fix race at module removal
If a device appears while module is being removed,
driver will get a callback after we've given up
on the major number.
In theory this means this major number can get reused
by something else, resulting in a conflict.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
---
drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
2014 Nov 27
0
[PATCH v5 21/45] virtio_blk: fix race at module removal
If a device appears while module is being removed,
driver will get a callback after we've given up
on the major number.
In theory this means this major number can get reused
by something else, resulting in a conflict.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
---
drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
2014 Nov 27
0
[PATCH v6 22/46] virtio_blk: fix race at module removal
If a device appears while module is being removed,
driver will get a callback after we've given up
on the major number.
In theory this means this major number can get reused
by something else, resulting in a conflict.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
---
drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git