Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "virot".
Did you mean:
viro
2016 Apr 28
2
Question about DFS
...uot; - is there any timetable
for it?
3. Is there a way to provide the dfs "links" directly under the
servername, without the namespace? (e.g. \\sambadfs\here)
In Windows this is possible with a "Workaround", the solution for that
is a dfs consolidation root.
(Source: http://virot.eu/setting-up-a-dfs-consolidation-root/)
Any help is welcome - thank you very much in advance.
Regards
Tom
2016 Apr 28
2
Question about DFS
...;> 3. Is there a way to provide the dfs "links" directly under the
>> servername, without the namespace? (e.g. \\sambadfs\here)
>> In Windows this is possible with a "Workaround", the solution for that
>> is a dfs consolidation root.
>> (Source: http://virot.eu/setting-up-a-dfs-consolidation-root/)
>>
>> Any help is welcome - thank you very much in advance
>
> wouldn't it be better to setup a redundant cluster FS like ceph on the
> backend storage and so have just a simple, large share from the
> viewpoint of samba?
Good i...
2016 Apr 28
0
Question about DFS
...gt; for it?
>
> 3. Is there a way to provide the dfs "links" directly under the
> servername, without the namespace? (e.g. \\sambadfs\here)
> In Windows this is possible with a "Workaround", the solution for that
> is a dfs consolidation root.
> (Source: http://virot.eu/setting-up-a-dfs-consolidation-root/)
>
> Any help is welcome - thank you very much in advance
wouldn't it be better to setup a redundant cluster FS like ceph on the
backend storage and so have just a simple, large share from the
viewpoint of samba?
-------------- next part -------...
2016 Apr 28
0
Question about DFS
...e a way to provide the dfs "links" directly under the
>>> servername, without the namespace? (e.g. \\sambadfs\here)
>>> In Windows this is possible with a "Workaround", the solution for that
>>> is a dfs consolidation root.
>>> (Source: http://virot.eu/setting-up-a-dfs-consolidation-root/)
>>>
>>> Any help is welcome - thank you very much in advance
>>>
>>
>> wouldn't it be better to setup a redundant cluster FS like ceph on the
>> backend storage and so have just a simple, large share from the...