Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "virnetdevbridgeaddport".
2013 Oct 16
2
libvirtError: Unable to add bridge br0 port vnet0: Operation not supported
...9;pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x03'
function='0x0'/>
</interface>
and instance fails to start with:
2013-10-16 11:16:13.004+0000: 11943: info : virNetDevProbeVnetHdr:122 :
Enabling IFF_VNET_HDR
2013-10-16 11:16:13.105+0000: 11943: error : virNetDevBridgeAddPort:370 :
Unable to add bridge br0 port vnet0: Operation not supported
If I add <virtualport type='openvswitch' /> inside <interface
type='bridge'>...</interface> it seems to work fine. Is it nova-network or
libvirt bug or some misconfiguration?
regards
--
Maciej Ga...
2015 Mar 02
2
QEMU interface type=ethernet
...o this. There is no way to have libvirt just create
a tap device and leave the rest to user defined scripts.
I don't think I have the necessary knowledge to add that feature in a
generic way, but it seems like it would be pretty handy. I'll probably
just work around it by removing the virNetDevBridgeAddPort call from our
version of libvirt.
2013 Oct 16
0
Re: libvirtError: Unable to add bridge br0 port vnet0: Operation not supported
...#39;0x00' slot='0x03'
> function='0x0'/>
> </interface>
>
> and instance fails to start with:
>
> 2013-10-16 11:16:13.004+0000: 11943: info : virNetDevProbeVnetHdr:122 :
> Enabling IFF_VNET_HDR
> 2013-10-16 11:16:13.105+0000: 11943: error : virNetDevBridgeAddPort:370 :
> Unable to add bridge br0 port vnet0: Operation not supported
>
> If I add <virtualport type='openvswitch' /> inside <interface
> type='bridge'>...</interface> it seems to work fine. Is it nova-network or
> libvirt bug or some misconfiguratio...
2015 Mar 02
0
Re: QEMU interface type=ethernet
...y to have libvirt just
> create a tap device and leave the rest to user defined scripts.
>
> I don't think I have the necessary knowledge to add that feature in a
> generic way, but it seems like it would be pretty handy. I'll probably
> just work around it by removing the virNetDevBridgeAddPort call from
> our version of libvirt.
>
In IRC, I was directed to this patch:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2015-February/msg01212.html
... which does exactly what I was looking for. It doesn't build cleanly
in that state, but it's pretty trivial fix (needs actualType...