Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "virlock".
Did you mean:
virtlock
2017 Aug 25
0
GlusterFS as virtual machine storage
....
So it seems that Pavel and WK have vastly different experience with
Gluster. Any plausible cause for that difference?
> WK wrote:
> 2 node plus Arbiter. You NEED the arbiter or a third node. Do NOT try 2
> node with a VM
This is true even if I manage locking at application level (via virlock
or sanlock)?
Also, on a two-node setup it is *guaranteed* for updates to one node to
put offline the whole volume?
On the other hand, a 3-way setup (or 2+arbiter) if free from all these
problems?
Thanks.
--
Danti Gionatan
Supporto Tecnico
Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it
email: g.danti at assy...
2017 Aug 25
2
GlusterFS as virtual machine storage
Il 23-08-2017 18:51 Gionatan Danti ha scritto:
> Il 23-08-2017 18:14 Pavel Szalbot ha scritto:
>> Hi, after many VM crashes during upgrades of Gluster, losing network
>> connectivity on one node etc. I would advise running replica 2 with
>> arbiter.
>
> Hi Pavel, this is bad news :(
> So, in your case at least, Gluster was not stable? Something as simple
> as an
2017 Aug 25
4
GlusterFS as virtual machine storage
> This is true even if I manage locking at application level (via virlock
> or sanlock)?
Yes. Gluster has it's own quorum, you can disable it but that's just a
recipe for a disaster.
> Also, on a two-node setup it is *guaranteed* for updates to one node to
> put offline the whole volume?
I think so, but I never took the chance so who knows.
> On...
2017 Aug 23
4
GlusterFS as virtual machine storage
Il 23-08-2017 18:14 Pavel Szalbot ha scritto:
> Hi, after many VM crashes during upgrades of Gluster, losing network
> connectivity on one node etc. I would advise running replica 2 with
> arbiter.
Hi Pavel, this is bad news :(
So, in your case at least, Gluster was not stable? Something as simple
as an update would let it crash?
> I once even managed to break this setup (with
2017 Aug 25
2
GlusterFS as virtual machine storage
On 8/25/2017 12:56 AM, Gionatan Danti wrote:
>
>
>> WK wrote:
>> 2 node plus Arbiter. You NEED the arbiter or a third node. Do NOT try 2
>> node with a VM
>
> This is true even if I manage locking at application level (via
> virlock or sanlock)?
We ran Rep2 for years on 3.4.? It does work if you are really,really?
careful,? But in a crash on one side, you might have lost some bits that
were on the fly. The VM would then try to heal.
Without sharding, big VMs take a while because the WHOLE VM file has to
be copied over. Th...