search for: vipin

...tate name based on code when showing the state field to user. But an advantage could be in terms of smaller database. In my opinion, saving 01 as an integer could save significant space than storing "california" if number of records happen to be in tens of thousands . please suggest ?? vipin

...nt background, i thought they should be the same. FYI, second code doesn''t give any error but still gets evaluated to TRUE. I confirmed by doing puts @forms.count in controller Query 2 ------------------------ which one is preferred @forms. count or @forms.size @forms is an array. thanks vipin

Hi, Vipin, What you're going to want to do here is convert your 8-bit stereo samples into 16-bit mono samples and back again when you're done(*). What you are actually doing here, it sounds like, is feeding 2 8-bit mono samples into Jspeex, which expects 16-bit mono. So, the most-significa...

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: config.txt Url: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20070501/bdf55878/attachment.txt

...ut is again buffered for sometime.But when i try to play it back i could hear sound only in right channel.Left channel is fully noise.Stereo mode was used in encoder and decoder.I am not using any format converter during playback..what can be the possible cause of the noise..plz reply -- Regards, Vipin Das MTech CyberSecurity Amrita School of Engineering -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20100328/838d6e2e/attachment-0001.htm

...p3): /usr/local/lib/dovecot/pop3 pop3_uidl_format(default): pop3_uidl_format(imap): pop3_uidl_format(pop3): %08Xu%08Xv auth default: passdb: driver: ldap args: /usr/local/etc/dovecot-ldap.conf userdb: driver: ldap args: /usr/local/etc/dovecot-ldap.conf Thanks & Regards Vipin Gupta Scientific Officer Computer Division BARC, Trombay Mumbai

...part. I had my migration as following #=============MIGRATION def self.up create_table :pk2s , :id=> false do |t| t.primary_key :uid t.string :name t.timestamps end end # ========== Model class Pk2 < ActiveRecord::Base set_primary_key "uid" end --vipin

...might be a sledgehammer approach). I'm geting this nagging feeling that there may need to be a mechanism where special annotations need to be placed in LLVM instruction stream to ensure safe optimizations.... Someone please tell me my concerns are totally unfounded, atleast for LLVM :-) - Vipin

...9; /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.2.0/lib/active_record/associations.rb:1289:in `new'' /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.2.0/lib/active_record/associations.rb:1289:in `ratings''[/code] This happens only in production mode. Not in development mode. Any ideas??? Vipin -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gman...

...t_id" "lft" "rgt" "text" ---------------------------------------------- "1" "NULL" "1" "2" "1000" "2" "NULL" "NULL" "NULL" "abcd" Thanks in advance Vipin -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, se...

...g, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of R-help digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: impossible to open SPSS file (Frank Thomas) > 2. Problem with the installation of "install R" on Sun Solaris > (Vipin Singhal) > 3. Re: Concepts question: environment, frame, search path > (Duncan Murdoch) > 4. adding column to a matrix (raymond chiruka) > 5. Re: intersect filled.contour and polygon (Roger Bivand) > 6. Re: to draw a smooth arc (Jim Lemon) > 7. Odp: adding column t...

I noticed this error message within some of my users log files; rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:_samr_query_aliasmem(2626) _samr_query_aliasmem: Not yet implemented. Why does this mean and what do I need to do to stop this error message from appearing. BTW, the users all have XP machines. Martin Stacey IT Support Manager Safcol Australia Pty Ltd

...aefer) > 47. Re: Valid users not working on 3.0.23d (John H Terpstra) > 48. HP-UX 10.20 (mazhead) > 49. Domain logins across subnets (John Paul) > 50. Re: Error (lettrepsy@redpsy.com) > 51. 400 Server Error - chdir failed - the server is not > configured correctly (Vipin Khushu) > 52. Re: Reference Documentation Server (- Reyneke) > 53. DFS in Vista (=?big5?B?TGF0cmVsbCBXYW5nIKT9xG269Q==?=) > 54. Solaris - Samba - AD (Daim Choc) > 55. File locking: is there some kind of timeout I can alter? > (Michael Rignaz) > > --------------...

Hello all, I need to modify llvm bytecode / native code just before it is emitted i.e. after all the regular operations and optimizations are done. I was told that this can be achieved by implementing a MachineFunctionPass. I searched the internet for some tutorials or some example MachineFunctionPass but found nothing. Kindly point some links, or anything that may help. Thank you. Regards,

On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Yueqiang wrote: > In high level languge there are usually have time and sync instruction, > to handle async and sync operation. > I want to know how LLVM take an count of these. I'm not sure exactly what 'time' and 'sync' operations you're talking about, or what languages support them. However, LLVM is designed to make it trivial to

hi, In high level languge there are usually have time and sync instruction, to handle async and sync operation. I want to know how LLVM take an count of these. thanks yueqiang 2003/12/19 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20031218/07381085/attachment.html>

On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 13:01, Vipin Gokhale wrote: > While on the subject of annotating bytecode with analysis info, could I > entice someone to also think about carrying other types of source-level > annotations through into bytecode ? This is particularly useful for > situations where one wants to use LLVM infrastruc...

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Sun, 16 Nov 2003, Reid Spencer wrote: > > >>On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 11:17, Chris Lattner wrote: >> >> >>>No, it's all or nothing. Once linked, they cannot be seperated (easily). >>>However, especially when using the JIT, there is little overhead for >>>running a gigantic program that only has 1% of the functions

On Sun, 16 Nov 2003, Reid Spencer wrote: > On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 11:17, Chris Lattner wrote: > > > No, it's all or nothing. Once linked, they cannot be seperated (easily). > > However, especially when using the JIT, there is little overhead for > > running a gigantic program that only has 1% of the functions in it ever > > executed... > > Perhaps in the

On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 11:17, Chris Lattner wrote: > No, it's all or nothing. Once linked, they cannot be seperated (easily). > However, especially when using the JIT, there is little overhead for > running a gigantic program that only has 1% of the functions in it ever > executed... Perhaps in the general case, but what if its running on an embedded system and the "gigantic