search for: vilk

...rn Thorsen Utvikler / driftstekniker Trollweb Solutions AS - Professional Magento Partner www.trollweb.no Telefon dagtid: +47 51215300 Telefon kveld/helg: For kunder med Serviceavtale Bes?ksadresse: Luramyrveien 40, 4313 Sandnes Postadresse: Maurholen 57, 4316 Sandnes Husk at alle v?re standard-vilk?r alltid er gjeldende

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27680 Summary: Misaligned reg ... nVidia Corporation C67 [GeForce 7150M / nForce 630M] (rev a2) Product: xorg Version: git Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau

Hi guys I have met some troubles when I want to evaluate the glusterfs performance with small file workload. 1: What kind of benchmark should I use to test the small file operation ? As we all know, we can use iozone tools to test the large file operation, while for the sake of memory cache, if we testing small file operation with iozone, the result will not correct.

Hey, all. I'm currently trying out GlusterFS 3.3. I've got two servers and four clients, all on separate boxes. I've got a Distributed-Replicated volume with 4 bricks, two from each server, and I'm using the FUSE client. I was trying out failover, currently testing for reads. I was reading a big file, using iftop to see which server was actually being read from. I put up an

Hello! I have GlusterFS installation with parameters: - 4 servers, connected by 1Gbit/s network (760-800 Mbit/s by iperf) - Distributed-replicated volume with 4 bricks and 2x4 redundancy formula. - Replicated volume with 2 bricks and 2x2 formula. I found some trouble: if I try to copy huge amount of files (94000 files, 3Gb size), this process takes terribly long time (from 20 to 40 minutes). I