search for: vif0.0

Hi, I am using Xen 4.1.1 with Linux 3.0.1 kernel. Previously (Xen 3.4.4 and linux kernel 2.6.18) Xen by default created veth0 <--> vif0.0 pair in dom0. With Xen 4.1.1 these pairs are missing in dom0. Using command ''ip link add type veth'' I can create veth0 and veth1 but vif0.0 is still missing in dom0. (When new domU created I can see vif1.x created) Could you please help

Hi, I am using Xen 4.1.1 with Linux 3.0.1 kernel. Previously (Xen 3.4.4 and linux kernel 2.6.18) Xen by default created veth0 <--> vif0.0 pair in dom0. With Xen 4.1.1 these pairs are missing in dom0. Using command ''ip link add type veth'' I can create veth0 and veth1 but vif0.0 is still missing in dom0. (When new domU created I can see vif1.x created) Could you please help

Objet : Xend start and after lose network Hi everybody : My configuration : Dapper 6.06 LTS with all updates Xen 3.0.2.2 My problem : After making ''xend start'', I lose network connections between my server and local network or internet. Nota : domU cas normally access to network I read about a similar problem in the bugtracker (N. 62) but it seems that this is normally

I tried netperf / netserver with Dom0 / DomU, but I could''nt get a correct NW traffic with xentop. Is there anybody could help me? At Host1''s Dom0, run netperf -H VMIP At Host2''s DomU (with VMIP named TTVM), run netserver At Host1, run xentop this way ->"xentop -n -b -d 1" At Host2, run xentop this way->"xentop -n -b -d 1" In Host2''s

When does vif0.0 get created? Is there some shell magic? I''m trying to figure out how to do a similar peth1/veth1 split for eth1. -- Nicholas Lee http://stateless.geek.nz gpg 8072 4F86 EDCD 4FC1 18EF 5BDD 07B0 9597 6D58 D70C _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Hi, If one sets xend to use network-bridge and there are no bridges already present then it seems that xend will clone eth0 to peth0, create xenbr0 and add peth0 and vif0.0 as ports on that bridge. If on the other hand xenbr0 is created in /etc/network/interfaces then xend will not do any of that peth0 stuff, nor will it add vif0.0 to xenbr0, yet (barring some changes in iptables rules) things

This patch adds an ACM hook into the network scripts (/etc/xen/scripts). It adds iptables rules that enforce mandatory access control on network packets exchanged between virtual interfaces. If ACM is active, this patch sets the default FORWARD policy in Dom0 to DROP and adds iptables ACCEPT rules between vifs that belong to domains that are permitted to share (determined by using the

Hi, I''ve set up identical (what I think) machines using SLES 10 x86_64, but a new one of those is saying frequently in /var/log/messages: kernel: bond0: received packet with own address as source address A short summary of ifconfig looks like this: bond0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:14:4F:2A:12:9C inet addr:132.199.176.78 Bcast:132.199.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0 eth0

Hello everybody, I have an odd problem with iptables using a Xen bridge setup. I don''t know if it would be better to post to netfilter Mailing-List. But I hope someone here know how to solve it. If it''s OT here, please let me know. I''ll try to do a little bit ASCII-Graphics to explain the topo better: _________ ________

Hi, I have a strange problem with my networking setup. I read all forums around the world where people had similar problems, but couldn''t find a solution. I have an Attansic L1 gigeth chip on my mainboard. This chip works OK in stock Ubuntu Gutsy (development) 2.6.22-9-generic kernel. When I boot into Xen, and after the bridge is created, the network stops working. Some info: - If I

Hello, At first i want to thank you for your work on such a wonderful piece of software. If can get my setup running as planned it will help me to use my hardware ressources in a much more efficient way. I''m a xen newbie an trying to setup following environment: xen-2.0.4 compiled from source hardware: 2 PIV 3GHz Processors, 1GB RAM, 2 NICs Dom0: Debian Sarge kernel 2.6.10 on xen-br0

(if this post gets line-feed-mangled please read http://www.dl.reneschmidt.de/shorewallxenpost.txt - that''s an unmangled version, thank you) Hello, first I would like to thank the Mr. Eastep and contributors for this great piece of software and superb documentation. I have a SOHO server (Debian testing) that I''m using for several purposes so I''ve set up a Xen

Hi there! I''m having some trouble getting networking going with Xen. When I first boot into the Xen kernel, I have two network interfaces (lo and eth0), both of which are configured correctly. When I start xend, peth0, vif0.0, and xenbr0 are added to the list. So far so good. When I actually instantiate a domain, no new vif entries are added to the list. If I try to bring up the

xenconsole fix. reference of tty->count in xencons_close() is racy. It must be protected by tty_sem semaphore like con_close() in drivers/char/vt.c -- yamahata _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Hello again, folks! I''m getting one strange problem with FC5 running on XEN 3.0.3 x64... The MRTG point to my machine with XEN running one absurd volume of output data sent (normal is around 6 MB/s) and when XEN is working we get 80 MB/s until my DRAC is alive... after this, the machine crash, DRAC stop do reply, swith stop do work together... Anyone knows whats happening now? ;)

Hi all, Has anyone seen this before? I''m running a CentOS 5.3 with xen 3.0 and the server has been running fine for a long time. In fact, it was up for 186 days before I had to reboot after the "network died", and I couldn''t fix it. The server has multiple domU''s on it, which all still works when the host node (dom0)''s network dies with these

I am installed Xen 3.0 on a Fedora Core 4(2.6.12-1.1454_FC4xen0) machine. This machine is currently running one host domain: [root@]# xm list Name Id Mem(MB) CPU VCPU(s) State Time(s) Domain-0 0 128 0 1 r---- 49.1 fc4-vm1 1 63 0 1 -b--- 18.5 Following is the network configuration for Domain-0: eth0 Link

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 3.2.0-2 Hello We used the script "network-bridge" on our Xen servers based on "etch" (xen-utils-common 3.0.3-0-2) to setup bridge configuration. This script created a bridge "xenbr0", renamed "eth0" to "peth0", renamed "veth0" to "eth0" and added "peth0" and "vif0.0" to

Before starting xend (xen 3.0) these are my correct network interfaces: eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:14:5E:0A:53:04 inet addr:192.168.1.51 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:14:5E:0A:53:05 inet addr:192.168.1.52 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 lo Link encap:Local Loopback inet

Hi ! What is the best way to use eth1 of my dom0 in my domU ? i tried that in Dom0 but bridge don''t want comes up : ./xen-network-common.sh "network-bridge net-dev=eth1 bridge=brint virtnum=1" Thanks Michael _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel