search for: viewership

It sounds like there are no objections to jumping to Windows 7 as the baseline. Is it worth getting a note added to the next LLVM weekly to give the potential change a bit of a wider viewership before going ahead with it or are we in a position to just do this now? If so, what are the actual mechanics of the change, and who'd like to do it? Thanks! -Greg On 14 July 2015 at 06:55, NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com> wrote: > +1. We may focus Windows 7, aka NT6.1, as t...

On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Greg Bedwell <gregbedwell at gmail.com> wrote: > It sounds like there are no objections to jumping to Windows 7 as the > baseline. Is it worth getting a note added to the next LLVM weekly to give > the potential change a bit of a wider viewership before going ahead with it > or are we in a position to just do this now? If so, what are the actual > mechanics of the change, and who'd like to do it? I think we should definitely get a note into the weekly update. We may also want to get it into the 3.7 release notes as a warning to...

...l 31, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Greg Bedwell <gregbedwell at gmail.com> > wrote: > > It sounds like there are no objections to jumping to Windows 7 as the > > baseline. Is it worth getting a note added to the next LLVM weekly to > give > > the potential change a bit of a wider viewership before going ahead with > it > > or are we in a position to just do this now? If so, what are the actual > > mechanics of the change, and who'd like to do it? > > I think we should definitely get a note into the weekly update. We may > also want to get it into the 3.7 r...

...M, Greg Bedwell <gregbedwell at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > It sounds like there are no objections to jumping to Windows 7 as the >> > baseline. Is it worth getting a note added to the next LLVM weekly to >> give >> > the potential change a bit of a wider viewership before going ahead >> with it >> > or are we in a position to just do this now? If so, what are the actual >> > mechanics of the change, and who'd like to do it? >> >> I think we should definitely get a note into the weekly update. We may >> also want...

+1. We may focus Windows 7, aka NT6.1, as the baseline. 2015年7月14日(火) 7:48 Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com>: > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > > Nobody objected to raising the bar, so I think we can go ahead and do > this. > > Keeping the XP support until 3.7 ships seems reasonable as it's less > >

...gregbedwell at gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > It sounds like there are no objections to jumping to Windows 7 as the >>> > baseline. Is it worth getting a note added to the next LLVM weekly to >>> give >>> > the potential change a bit of a wider viewership before going ahead >>> with it >>> > or are we in a position to just do this now? If so, what are the >>> actual >>> > mechanics of the change, and who'd like to do it? >>> >>> I think we should definitely get a note into the weekly u...