search for: view_bug

We just updated our configuratiosn to have multiple NIS servers, when we initiated a test of client failover, we were disapointed. It seemed that the only way to get a filaover was to /etc/init.d/ypbind restart. It behaves as indicated in http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=5084845 using ypbind-1.17.2-13 on Centos 4.5 / Linux xxxxxxxxxxxx 2.6.9-55.0.12.ELsmp #1 SMP Fri Nov 2 12:38:56 EDT 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4858192 Any advice? -Jason -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-...

Currently I''m trying to figure out the best zfs layout for a thumper wrt. to read AND write performance. I did some simple mkfile 512G tests and found out, that per average ~ 500 MB/s seems to be the maximum on can reach (tried initial default setup, all 46 HDDs as R0, etc.). According to http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/DownloadableAssets/ArchitectureWP_062806.pdf I would

Zpool split is a wonderful feature and it seems to work well, and the choice of which disk got which name was perfect! But there seems to be an odd anomaly (at least with b132) . Started with c0t1d0s0 running b132 (root pool is called rpool) Attached c0t0d0s0 and waited for it to resilver Rebooted from c0t0d0s0 zpool split rpool spool Rebooted from c0t0d0s0, both rpool and spool were mounted

Is there any way to control the resliver speed? Having attached a third disk to a mirror (so I can replace the other disks with larger ones) the resilver goes at a fraction of the speed of the same operation using disk suite. However it still renders the system pretty much unusable for anything else. So I would like to control the rate of the resilver. Either slow it down a lot so that the

...ing feature, I assumed that Solaris would have at least some SMART support, but what I''ve googled so far has been discouraging. http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2006/10/29/solaris-needs-smart-support-please-help/ Bug ID: 4665068 SMART support in IDE driver http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=4665068 Bug ID: 6280687 Collect SMART data from disks and deliver info to FMA http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6280687 If it''s not automated into ZFS or FMA yet, then smartmontools would be enough for me. Did Sun''s endowment of storage related code to...

Hi everyone, Is there an easy way to find out which files has changed between two snapshots? Currently I''m doing a # rsync -arvn <snapshot1> <snapshot2> and it creates a list. But rsync needs to go through the whole filesystem and compare files. It would be nice if zfs would have this option builtin. Regards, Nickus

Hi Folks, Just wondering if anyone had any tips for trying to install a NV 94 DomU with ZFS root to an iSCSI Target? The iSCSI Target happens to be a NV 94 system with ZVOLs exported as the Targets, but I wouldn''t think that would matter. I tried this last week and the install seemed to complete fine, but when the DomU attempted to reboot after install, I received a message to the

...thinking about ZFS as the next generation filesystem without limits I am wondering if the real world is ready for this kind of incredible technology ... I''m actually speaking of hardware :) ZFS can handle a lot of devices. Once in the import bug (http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6761786) is fixed it should be able to handle a lot of disks. I want to ask the ZFS community and users what large scale deploments are out there. How man disks ? How much capacity ? Single pool or many pools on a server ? How does resilver work in those environtments ? How to you back...

I just installed build 41 of Nevada on a SunBlade 1500 with 2GB of ram. I wanted to check out zfs since the delay of S10U2 I really could not wait any longer :) I installed it on my system and created a zpool out of an approximately 40GB disk slice. I then wanted to build a version of thunderbird that contains a local patch that we like. So I download the source tar ball. I try to untar it on the

What does it mean for the reported value of a zvol volsize to be less than the product of used and compressratio? For example, # zfs get -p all home1/home1mm01 NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE home1/home1mm01 type volume - home1/home1mm01 creation 1254440045 - home1/home1mm01 used 14902492672

I''m using Solaris 10u6 updated to u7 via patches, and I have a pool with a mirrored pair and a (shared) hot spare. We reconfigured disks a while ago and now the controller is c4 instead of c2. The hot spare was originally on c2, and apparently on rebooting it didn''t get found. So, I looked up what the new name for the hot spare was, then added it to the pool with "zpool

Hi, I''m referring to; http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6977913 It should be in Solaris 11 Express, has anyone tried this? How this is supposed to work? Any documentation available? Yours Markus Kovero -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/attachme...

...0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 c7t1d0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 c7t2d0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 c7t3d0 Perhaps related bugs: Disk access stops for minutes with 100% blocking http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6544624 si3124 driver loses interrupts. http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6566207 Any ideas? Should I ditch the SIL3224 cards as they seem to have a bad rep on this maillist? I have ordered a Sun SG-XPCI8SAS-E-Z which is an SAS PCI-X card but it will cost me a lot more...

Dear all We ran into a nasty problem the other day. One of our mirrored zpool hosts several ZFS filesystems. After a reboot (all FS mounted at that time an in use) the machine paniced (console output further down). After detaching one of the mirrors the pool fortunately imported automatically in a faulted state without mounting the filesystems. Offling the unplugged device and clearing the fault

In reading bug id 6510395 http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6510395 is it ok for OpenSolaris users to read the new policy? ---Bob This message posted from opensolaris.org

Hello, According to http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4970596 and other notes I read it appears that the ability to run dtrace programs (by having dtrace_proc and dtrace_user privileges configured inside NGZ''s) has been made available (through various projects) since build 37 of Nevada. I am not merely referring to configurable...

Is there a mechanism by which you can perform a zfs send | zfs receive and not have the data uncompressed and recompressed at the other end? I have a gzip-9 compressed filesystem that I want to backup to a remote system and would prefer not to have to recompress everything again at such great computation expense. If this doesn''t exist, how would one go about creating an RFE for

6727404: intermittent fdisk errors while installing xVM Server guests http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6727404 Is that (at least case #1) the same as OpenSolaris 2008.05 bug 2133 (comment #22)? http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=2133 In some cases the Solaris ata driver is returning a slightly truncated capacity with the DIOCTL_GETGEOM / DIOCTL_GETPHYGEOM ioctl......

I see there are some bugzilla links open but not really sure if they conform to the same behaviour what I see. http://www.mail-archive.com/samba at lists.samba.org/msg94854.html https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5315 http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6213298 http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do;jsessionid=991fdfd56a9fcffffffffcbbb8cdf50d6de3?bug_id=4313887 http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=203 On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Nikhil <mnikhil at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > We have a CIFS server running on a N...

I have just upgraded my jumpstart server to S10 u2 b9a. It is an Ultra 10 with two 120GB EIDE drives. The second drive (disk1) is new, and has u2b9a installed on a slice, with most of the space in slice 7 for the ZFS pool I created pool1 on disk1, and created the filesystem pool1/ro (for legacy reasons). I them moved my data from the original disk0 UFS file system to pool1/ro. Initially I