search for: victum

Hai, Why would you ever add Domain users to Local Admins? Thas really a very big NO NO, dont do that, really.. Dont.. If you want to be an victum of online crime, that thats the way to allow it to happen. Now your GPO. Its a new setup, correct? If so. Login on the AD and kinit Administrator Run : samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset -k Now, goto the Default Domain policy, is "authenticated users" set as security filter? If not, do...

...a new one on my todo list to figure a setup with netplan. Thanks guys ;-/    Now a nice example of why to configure network/dns and stay in scope of the systems viewpoint. http://www.ubuntugeek.com/how-to-fix-dns-problems-after-upgrading-ubuntu-17-10-from-ubuntu-17-04-16-10-16-04.html I was also a victum of such upgrade problems multiple times yes. to configure outside the systems viewpoint.  ( long ago ubuntu 8.x/10.x Debian 4-5-6 )   Understanding "my way" of installing..   I'll try to keep it a short message..  and remember its "my way" not a preffered way, its my preffe...

I have hollowed these instructions. https://github.com/thctlo/samba4/blob/master/full-howto-Ubuntu18.04-samba-AD_DC.txt My normal domain is company.com. For the Samba domain it is msi.company.com. DNS is working. I ran these commands. host -t SRV _ldap._tcp.msi.company.com. _ldap._tcp.msi.company.com has SRV record 0 100 389 dc0.msi.company.com. host -t SRV _kerberos._udp.msi.company.com.

So, I'm curious about the contrast between modifying netplan vs simply disabling systemd.resolved Is there some advantage to the gyrations to make netplan work, vs simply disabling resolved and manually defining the IP and DNS server? [I'm not complaining, I'm thankful for all the options - just wanting to have the best handle possible on the reasoning behind one method vs the other.]