search for: viaduct

Hello all, I thought this was an interesting hit in my rss viaduct : Coding4Fun : XML 4 Fun : Taking the Backpack offline http://msdn.microsoft.com/coding4fun/xmlforfun/BackPackAPI_PartI/default.aspx The gist, learn XML with microsoft''s leet tools via the 37s Backpack API. -- ------------------------------ Forget the icing. Bake the Cake! - the e...

I am experimenting with a kvm virtual machine. At the moment I trying to configure iptables for the the host instance. In Xen terms I would call this Dom0 but I do not know the appropriate KVM term, if any. The setup I have is a single NIC (eth0) host bridged (bridge0). I want iptables to allow all host generated traffic (! bridge0 I think) and to check all other traffic for brute force

Hi, I have only one ethernet port in a remote server. (eth0) I have a public address with x.x.x.164 netmask 255.255.255.240 gw x.x.x.161 and want to use in my guest OS the next available ip address (x.x.x.165 netmask 255.255.255.240 gw x.x.x.161) Is this posible with brctl to achieve this? I did a file called ifcfg-xenbr0 with: DEVICE=xenbr0 TYPE=Bridge BOOTPROTO=dhcp ONBOOT=yes then

Hi, I have only one ethernet port in a remote server. (eth0) I have a public address with x.x.x.164 netmask 255.255.255.240 gw x.x.x.161 and want to use in my guest OS the next available ip address (x.x.x.165 netmask 255.255.255.240 gw x.x.x.161) Is this posible with brctl to achieve this? I did a file called ifcfg-xenbr0 with: DEVICE=xenbr0 TYPE=Bridge BOOTPROTO=dhcp ONBOOT=yes then

Are there any known vulnerabilities in portmap (redhat''s portmap-4.0-7b)? I''ve been receiving a lot of attempts to access the portmap port on some linuxppc machines I administer by various machines which clearly have no business with mine, and I wonder if this is an attempt to break in to my machines. I''ve searched some archives, but I haven''t yet found any

...) id IAA26714; Wed, 9 Dec 1998 08:39:24 -0500 Date: Wed, 9 Dec 1998 08:39:22 -0500 (EST) From: "Paul L. Schmidt" <pschmidt@custom.net> X-Sender: pschmidt@k9ps.ampr.org To: linux-security@redhat.com Subject: [linux-security] Re: portmap vulnerability? In-Reply-To: <tcppop3.2146931@Viaduct.CUSTOM.NET> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.981209081742.26510B-100000@k9ps.ampr.org> Errors-To: pschmidt@custom.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-moderate: yes On 9 Dec 1998 R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl wrote: > Christopher Lindsey wrote: > > And of course...

I''m in the process of locking down as much of my systems here as possible as to available ports. I am down to only a handful but am not sure how much of a security risk they pose and was wondering if anyone here might be able to comment, or suggest secure versions to run: 21/FTP (WU-ftpd v2.4.2 BETA 14) 22/SSH (1.22) 23/TELNET (Netkit 0.09) 25/SMTP (Sendmail

Hi folks. I am just starting rails and have two current issues. I have installed everything, I think, and (first) I''m having permissions feedback upon rails generate: > $ rails generate > /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/railties-3.1.0/lib/rails/script_rails_loader.rb:11: warning: Insecure world writable dir /Library/WebServer/Documents in PATH, mode 040777 >