search for: via

If someone has some free time, can you go over my ipfw config. See if I have any problems, or things i should add. Im not an ipfw expert or anything. Here is the config. add 100 allow all from any to any via lo0 add 110 deny log all from any to 127.0.0.0/8 add 120 deny log ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any add 00200 check-state add 00250 deny all from any to any frag in via bge0 add 00260 deny tcp from any to any established in via bge0 ###### outbound section ###### ## standard http ## add 00300 allo...

...would like to be sure not to make any mistake. Thanks a lot in advance. Antoine Here is my ruleset: #!/bin/sh # Firewall Command fwcmd="/sbin/ipfw" # Flush out the list before we begin. ${fwcmd} -f flush # Stop spoofing ${fwcmd} add deny all from 192.168.0.0:255.255.255.0 to any in via tun0 ### ${fwcmd} add deny all from ${outside_net}:${outside_mask} to any in via vr0 ### Disabled --> dynamic @ip # Stop RFC1918 nets on the outside interface ${fwcmd} add deny all from any to 10.0.0.0/8 via tun0 ${fwcmd} add deny all from any to 172.16.0.0/12 via tun0 ${fwcmd} add deny all fr...

To those of you who may be interested, to get SATA drives to work on this motherboard with Xen 3.3.1 (compiled from source) you need to set SATA to RAID mode in the BIOS, not the default IDE mode. So I can only assume that the 2.6.18.8 kernel has a problem with the VIA SATA in IDE mode, and can''t recognise it, even though the host OS (Ubuntu 8.04LTS, in my case) has no problems with it. After setting the BIOS lspci gives me this: 00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. CN896/VN896/P4M900 Host Bridge 00:00.1 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. CN896...

heya i've been using freebsd's ipfw for quite a while and recently on a new server i've got this issue with ipfw that i can't understand ... something is wrong ... 01000 8042 1947866 allow ip from any to any via fxp0 01010 0 0 allow ip from any to any via lo0 01014 9886 4170269 divert 8668 ip from any to any in via vr0 01015 0 0 check-state 01130 14679 5695969 skipto 1800 ip from any to any out via vr0 keep-state 01300 0 0 deny ip from 192.168.0.0/16 <http://192.168.0.0/16> to any in via vr0 01301 0...

...PXE parameters. Note this output upon starting two VMs on two different subnets: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- tail -n1 -f </var/log/syslog | egrep -i "dhcpd|dnsmasq-dhcp" Sep 13 05:11:25 host dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 52:54:00:72:f0:e2 via virbr0 Sep 13 05:11:25 host dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 52:54:00:2a:e0:a6 via virbr1 Sep 13 05:11:26 host dhcpd: DHCPOFFER on 192.168.122.194 to 52:54:00:72:f0:e2 via virbr0 Sep 13 05:11:26 host dhcpd: DHCPOFFER on 192.168.100.107 to 52:54:00:2a:e0:a6 via virbr1 Sep 13 05:11:27 host dhcpd: DHCPREQUEST...

I tried install 4.4 on an old Via 800mhz box. i386 of course. The installer dies pretty quick. I thought the via was i386 compatible? Is there something special to do. Jerry

...t status = 0; ccd979bdbce9fb Mark Fasheh 2005-12-15 1806 struct ocfs2_super *osb = OCFS2_SB(sb); ccd979bdbce9fb Mark Fasheh 2005-12-15 1807 ccd979bdbce9fb Mark Fasheh 2005-12-15 1808 if (ocfs2_is_hard_readonly(osb)) 0737e01de9c411 Heming Zhao via Ocfs2-devel 2022-04-29 @1809 goto out; Hard to tell if this should be an error path or not... Canonical problem with do nothing gotos. ccd979bdbce9fb Mark Fasheh 2005-12-15 1810 5500ab4ed3b8f0 Gang He 2019-03-05 1811 mutex_init(&osb->obs_trim_f...

...lot of requests from asterisk to sipgate.de, which are not answered. but communication is going fine in both directions (otherwise registration would not be possible?): <--- Received SIP request (1302 bytes) from UDP:217.10.79.9:5060 ---> INVITE sip:2636146e0 at 80.142.13.32:55060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 217.10.79.9;branch=z9hG4bK56ac.c519528374e3101a61791cf5a0ad1aae.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.20.40.6;branch=z9hG4bK56ac.2ecd3532ae51c927dabcc6e27eaa4cbe.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 217.10.68.137;branch=z9hG4bK56ac.73e224299594933979fdfb5b036e6563.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 217.10.77.115:5060;branch=z9hG4b...

Hi iproute2, I have a network to reach which is 192.168.2.0/24. It is a branch of the company. I have currently added a route to that network via one gateway ( 192.168.0.254) in following way. ip route add 192.168.2.0/24 via 192.168.0.254 Now, We got another gateway which is 192.168.0.250. Now I want to add a route to the same network which is 192.168.2.0/24 via this gateway ( 192.168.0.250) as well. Then I will have 2 paths to the same...

...to be around gigabytes (last time it was 10GB), sometimes 500MB is enough to stop the network... I also tried to change the NIC, but the behavior is the same. Btw. logs don't say anything :-/ Any idea ? Thank you very much ! Vladimir PS: this is the output of my lspci: 00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. K8T800Pro Host Bridge 00:00.1 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. K8T800Pro Host Bridge 00:00.2 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. K8T800Pro Host Bridge 00:00.3 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. K8T800Pro Host Bridge 00:00.4 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. K8T800Pro Host B...

...l drs showrepl | more Default-First-Site-Name\ISLAD01 DSA Options: 0x00000001 DSA object GUID: 3fe6bc7c-1116-4344-96a6-c58c43bc217f DSA invocationId: 89351eec-7207-45f5-b6b9-cebfcacfd0e3 ==== INBOUND NEIGHBORS ==== DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=simalaya-group,DC=com Default-First-Site-Name\ADCAD01 via RPC DSA object GUID: 1e3dc50c-5138-4760-bdd7-69fdf8ab2335 Last attempt @ Tue Feb 10 17:48:43 2015 CET was successful 0 consecutive failure(s). Last success @ Tue Feb 10 17:48:43 2015 CET DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=simalaya-group,DC=com...

Hello list, i?m looking forward to buy a new server. It should be low voltage so i?m thinking of a via eden processor like this one -> http://tinyurl.com/3ymlkl (sorry, there?s only a german page). Has someone expierence in using a via eden processsor? Thanks! Kamill

Changes replicate to it, but not from it. vsc\VSC-DC02 DSA Options: 0x00000001 DSA object GUID: fe066b13-6f9e-4f3c-beb4-37df1292b8cb DSA invocationId: 8a2b1405-07b1-4d92-89dd-1d993e59e378 ==== INBOUND NEIGHBORS ==== DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=mediture,DC=dom vsc\DC01 via RPC DSA object GUID: da9bb168-47a0-4368-aff3-bf06d1b869d2 Last attempt @ Tue Mar 14 09:26:12 2017 CDT was successful 0 consecutive failure(s). Last success @ Tue Mar 14 09:26:12 2017 CDT DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=mediture,DC=dom...

...lores en la lista inicial se tendría 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 3 8 1 7 4 6 4 5 2 3 4 10 15 5 En definitiva sería de reordenar los valores colocandolos al final del grupo seleccionado. La lógica y el motivo de xq realizar estas operaciones es la siguiente: Me encuentro simulando viajes de pasajeros en donde los valores de la lista representan el destino y la posición representa el orden en que los pasajeros han llegado a la parada para tomar el autobus; las condiciones de >3 y <8 (pueden ser otras) representan que el bus al llegar a la parada no realiza desembarque en la...

....168.254.1 peer 192.168.254.2/32 scope global tun0 $ ip route show 192.168.254.6 dev tun1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.254.5 192.168.254.2 dev tun0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.254.1 65.223.121.224/28 dev eth2 scope link 209.189.103.192/27 dev eth1 scope link 192.168.160.0/24 via 192.168.124.28 dev eth5 192.168.150.0/24 dev eth3 scope link 192.168.1.0/24 via 192.168.254.2 dev tun0 192.168.124.0/24 dev eth5 scope link 192.168.170.0/24 dev eth4 scope link 192.168.111.0/24 via 192.168.124.28 dev eth5 172.16.10.0/24 via 192.168.254.6 dev tun1 192.168.120.0/24 via 192.168.124...

.../www.ssi.bg/~ja/ Overall everything works nearly perfectly. Incomming connections to either the fios (PPPoE) connection, or cable modem get routed back out correctly. The problem I''m having is with the default gateway. ${IP} route add default table 221 proto static \ nexthop via ${EXTGW2} dev ${EXTIF2} weight 1\ nexthop via ${EXTGW1} dev ${EXTIF1} weight 5 With this command, connections going out from my network always seem to use the GW1 route. I if I reverse the order of the nexthop''s to list GW1 first and GW2 second, then the reverse happens and a...

On 10/1/2020 8:34 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 01/10/2020 13:30, Jason Keltz via samba wrote: >> On 10/1/2020 8:28 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> >>> On 01/10/2020 13:17, Jason Keltz via samba wrote: >>>> So why is it that winbind renews the ticket on the original system, >>&g...

Has anyone successfully run asterisk with a VIA processor ? I have tried unsucessfully, do I have to run make with any specific switches ?

...e other machines. I start the install of centos with xm create -c mynewdomu. Everything seems fine and the installer tries to get an IP. When I look at /var/log/messages in the Dom0 I see the DHCP-requests of the new machine: Sep 26 17:35:53 data-domain0 dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 00:16:3e:aa:bb:dd via eth0 Sep 26 17:35:53 data-domain0 dhcpd: DHCPOFFER on 10.1.0.144 to 00:16:3e:aa:bb:dd via eth0 Sep 26 17:36:03 data-domain0 dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 00:16:3e:aa:bb:dd via eth0 Sep 26 17:36:03 data-domain0 dhcpd: DHCPOFFER on 10.1.0..144 to 00:16:3e:aa:bb:dd via eth0 Sep 26 17:36:12 data-domain0 dhc...

Hi list gurus, long story short we have firewall machine which is the default gateway for our clients and firewall send traffic out to Internet via cisco router. On cisco we have two serial interfaces 1Mb and 2Mb. On firewall #route add default gw xxx.xxx.xx.xxx (for 2mb) #route add default gw xxx.xxx.xx.xxx (for 1mb) and the same rule for Imb link route packets via these two links. However I don''t know what kernel do when sending tra...