search for: vhost_scsi_send_bad_target

...q_desc, 0); + vhost_put_used_buf(cmd->tvc_vq, &cmd->tvc_vq_desc); q = container_of(cmd->tvc_vq, struct vhost_scsi_virtqueue, vq); vq = q - vs->vqs; __set_bit(vq, signal); @@ -793,7 +808,7 @@ static void vhost_scsi_submission_work(struct work_struct *work) static void vhost_scsi_send_bad_target(struct vhost_scsi *vs, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, - int head, unsigned out) + struct vhost_buf *buf, unsigned out) { struct virtio_scsi_cmd_resp __user *resp; struct virtio_scsi_cmd_resp rsp; @@ -804,7 +819,7 @@ vhost_scsi_send_bad_target(struct vhost_scsi *vs, resp = vq-&g...

...q_desc, 0); + vhost_put_used_buf(cmd->tvc_vq, &cmd->tvc_vq_desc); q = container_of(cmd->tvc_vq, struct vhost_scsi_virtqueue, vq); vq = q - vs->vqs; __set_bit(vq, signal); @@ -793,7 +808,7 @@ static void vhost_scsi_submission_work(struct work_struct *work) static void vhost_scsi_send_bad_target(struct vhost_scsi *vs, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, - int head, unsigned out) + struct vhost_buf *buf, unsigned out) { struct virtio_scsi_cmd_resp __user *resp; struct virtio_scsi_cmd_resp rsp; @@ -804,7 +819,7 @@ vhost_scsi_send_bad_target(struct vhost_scsi *vs, resp = vq-&g...

...d->tvc_vq, cmd->tvc_vq_desc_urgent, + cmd->tvc_vq_desc, 0); q = container_of(cmd->tvc_vq, struct vhost_scsi_virtqueue, vq); vq = q - vs->vqs; __set_bit(vq, signal); @@ -947,6 +951,7 @@ static void tcm_vhost_submission_work(struct work_struct *work) static void vhost_scsi_send_bad_target(struct vhost_scsi *vs, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, + bool urgent, int head, unsigned out) { struct virtio_scsi_cmd_resp __user *resp; @@ -958,7 +963,7 @@ vhost_scsi_send_bad_target(struct vhost_scsi *vs, resp = vq->iov[out].iov_base; ret = __copy_to_user(resp, &rsp,...

Below should be useful for some experiments Jason is doing. I thought I'd send it out for early review/feedback. Compiled-only at this point. event idx feature allows us to defer interrupts until a specific # of descriptors were used. Sometimes it might be useful to get an interrupt after a specific descriptor, regardless. This adds a descriptor flag for this, and an API to create an urgent

Below should be useful for some experiments Jason is doing. I thought I'd send it out for early review/feedback. Compiled-only at this point. event idx feature allows us to defer interrupts until a specific # of descriptors were used. Sometimes it might be useful to get an interrupt after a specific descriptor, regardless. This adds a descriptor flag for this, and an API to create an urgent

Hi all: This RFC implement packed ring layout. The code were tested with pmd implement by Jens at http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-January/089417.html. Minor change was needed for pmd codes to kick virtqueue since it assumes a busy polling backend. Test were done between localhost and guest. Testpmd (rxonly) in guest reports 2.4Mpps. Testpmd (txonly) repots about 2.1Mpps. Notes: The event

Hi all: This RFC implement packed ring layout. The code were tested with pmd implement by Jens at http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-January/089417.html. Minor change was needed for pmd codes to kick virtqueue since it assumes a busy polling backend. Test were done between localhost and guest. Testpmd (rxonly) in guest reports 2.4Mpps. Testpmd (txonly) repots about 2.1Mpps. Notes: The event

Hi all: This RFC implement packed ring layout. The code were tested with Tiwei's RFC V3 ahttps://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/25/34. Some fixups and tweaks were needed on top of Tiwei's code to make it run for event index. Pktgen reports about 20% improvement on PPS (event index is off). More testing is ongoing. Notes for tester: - Start from this version, vhost need qemu co-operation to work

Hi all: This RFC implement packed ring layout. The code were tested with Tiwei's RFC V3 ahttps://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/25/34. Some fixups and tweaks were needed on top of Tiwei's code to make it run for event index. Pktgen reports about 20% improvement on PPS (event index is off). More testing is ongoing. Notes for tester: - Start from this version, vhost need qemu co-operation to work

Hi all: This RFC implement packed ring layout. The code were tested with Tiwei's RFC V2 a thttps://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/1/48. Some fixups and tweaks were needed on top of Tiwei's code to make it run. TCP stream and pktgen does not show obvious difference compared with split ring. Changes from V2: - do not use & in checking desc_event_flags - off should be most significant bit -

Hi all: This RFC implement packed ring layout. The code were tested with Tiwei's RFC V2 a thttps://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/1/48. Some fixups and tweaks were needed on top of Tiwei's code to make it run. TCP stream and pktgen does not show obvious difference compared with split ring. Changes from V2: - do not use & in checking desc_event_flags - off should be most significant bit -

Hi all: This RFC implement packed ring layout. The code were tested with Tiwei's RFC V5 at https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/22/138. Some fixups and tweaks were needed on top of Tiwei's code to make it run for event index. Pktgen reports about 20% improvement on TX PPS when doing pktgen from guest to host. No ovbious improvement on RX PPS. We can do lots of optimizations on top but for simple

tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nab/target-pending.git for-next head: 2936f1d4f3e8247bd519feba7892371d5e4c6603 commit: 105acf608f25d5e0d9fef669299a5438b7b114ee [16/21] vhost/scsi: Add ANY_LAYOUT vhost_skip_iovec_bytes helper reproduce: # apt-get install sparse git checkout 105acf608f25d5e0d9fef669299a5438b7b114ee make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig make C=1

tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nab/target-pending.git for-next head: 2936f1d4f3e8247bd519feba7892371d5e4c6603 commit: 105acf608f25d5e0d9fef669299a5438b7b114ee [16/21] vhost/scsi: Add ANY_LAYOUT vhost_skip_iovec_bytes helper reproduce: # apt-get install sparse git checkout 105acf608f25d5e0d9fef669299a5438b7b114ee make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig make C=1

Hi all: This series implements packed virtqueues. The code were tested with Tiwei's guest driver series at https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/942297/ Pktgen test for both RX and TX does not show obvious difference with split virtqueues. The main bottleneck is the guest Linux driver, since it can not stress vhost for a 100% CPU utilization. A full TCP benchmark is ongoing. Will test

Hi all: This series implements packed virtqueues. The code were tested with Tiwei's guest driver series at https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/942297/ Pktgen test for both RX and TX does not show obvious difference with split virtqueues. The main bottleneck is the guest Linux driver, since it can not stress vhost for a 100% CPU utilization. A full TCP benchmark is ongoing. Will test

Hi all: This series implements packed virtqueues. The code were tested with Tiwei's RFC V6 at https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/5/120. Pktgen test for both RX and TX does not show obvious difference with split virtqueues. The main bottleneck is the guest Linux driver, since it can not stress vhost for a 100% CPU utilization. A full TCP benchmark is ongoing. Will test virtio-net pmd as well when

Hi all: This series implements packed virtqueues. The code were tested with Tiwei's RFC V6 at https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/5/120. Pktgen test for both RX and TX does not show obvious difference with split virtqueues. The main bottleneck is the guest Linux driver, since it can not stress vhost for a 100% CPU utilization. A full TCP benchmark is ongoing. Will test virtio-net pmd as well when

...q) if (t10_pi) { if (v_req_pi.pi_bytesout) { if (data_direction != DMA_TO_DEVICE) { - vq_err(vq, "Received non zero pi_bytesout," - " but wrong data_direction\n"); + vq_err(vq, "Received non zero pi_bytesout, but wrong data_direction\n"); vhost_scsi_send_bad_target(vs, vq, head, out); continue; } prot_bytes = vhost32_to_cpu(vq, v_req_pi.pi_bytesout); } else if (v_req_pi.pi_bytesin) { if (data_direction != DMA_FROM_DEVICE) { - vq_err(vq, "Received non zero pi_bytesin," - " but wrong data_direction\n"); +...

...q) if (t10_pi) { if (v_req_pi.pi_bytesout) { if (data_direction != DMA_TO_DEVICE) { - vq_err(vq, "Received non zero pi_bytesout," - " but wrong data_direction\n"); + vq_err(vq, "Received non zero pi_bytesout, but wrong data_direction\n"); vhost_scsi_send_bad_target(vs, vq, head, out); continue; } prot_bytes = vhost32_to_cpu(vq, v_req_pi.pi_bytesout); } else if (v_req_pi.pi_bytesin) { if (data_direction != DMA_FROM_DEVICE) { - vq_err(vq, "Received non zero pi_bytesin," - " but wrong data_direction\n"); +...